>>279771957>>2797719661. Glacial Pacing That Punishes Patience
The first half of Steins;Gate is notoriously slow, meandering through low-stakes banter, awkward comedy, and pseudoscientific jargon. It takes nearly a dozen episodes before the central conflict truly emerges, by which point many viewers have already checked out.
2. Shallow Side Characters
Outside of Okabe, most characters exist as flat tropes. Daru is the stereotypical pervert hacker, Mayuri is infantilized to the point of irrelevance, and others like Moeka or Faris function more as plot devices than believable people. Their "arcs" are either rushed, manipulative, or emotionally hollow.
3. Inconsistent Tone
The show oscillates wildly between silly rom-com antics and grim psychological trauma. One moment it's about microwave bananas and tsundere teasing, and the next it's a death-spiral of despair. The tonal shifts feel forced rather than fluid, making it hard to take the drama seriously.
4. Pseudoscience Over Substance
Steins;Gate hides its lack of rigor behind jargon and vague scientific references. It throws around terms like “CERN,” “black hole,” and “Reading Steiner” with confidence but little internal logic. The mechanics of its time travel often collapse under scrutiny, especially once alternate world lines become a narrative convenience.
5. Overrated Emotional Payoffs
While fans laud its twists and tragic moments, many of these feel unearned. Key deaths are used for shock value and are quickly reversed or rendered meaningless. The show leans heavily on contrived melodrama without building adequate emotional foundations.
6. Pretentious Without Depth
Beneath the façade of complexity lies a relatively shallow plot dressed up with theatrical monologues and faux-intellectual posturing. It mistakes eccentricity for depth and often seems more interested in appearing smart than saying anything meaningful.