>>280001623Its certainly a double-edged sword, I will agree with you. Having short form content utilizing a cast of flat characters is fine, or having some flat characters supporting a well rounded character can work wonders. Literally the entire purpose behind the structure of main/supporting characters. The issue I think is that a lot of the time these main characters are flat themselves, and don't have much going for them other than one or two personality traits, and some sort of generic motivation factor (Japanese authors love to use love for that one). However, that could also still be okay depending on the context, but I feel like Japanese authors want their cake and eat it too. They want intricate deep stories but put a piece of wood at the forefront of everything. So, because their character is so weakly defined, they are forced to push the plot along to whatever ending/point they have to get to, instead of just having a really well defined character that on their own can drive plot on their own.
>It makes stories extremely long and it removes focus from the themes that you're trying to push.I agree mostly with the first part, but disagree with the second. You can absolutely explore all sorts of themes through strong well rounded characters, but it does require tact to do well.
Honestly lol, my main issue is with Japanese writings that portray themselves as very heavily character driven, only to find that the characters themselves are just shallow pools that have zero depth, and it gets even worse when others tout it as some god's gift to writing prowess. There is a manga I've stopped reading that was like this, very heavily character focused, yet, each and every character could be summed up in like two sentences. Even the protagonists had almost no depth to them. This author also LOVES to use his characters as plot devices, they to him, are just a means to an end, and that to me, is a travesty of writing.