Why is it that whenever we get a used-goods heroine it was never her fault that she got fucked in every hole?
Lets break it down, shall we?
>holo
literally 1000 year old wolf, can't blame her for not waiting for Lawrence
>higehiro slut
It's the men's fault for 'forcing' her in exchange for shelter and then the government's fault for making laws that drove them to kick her out.
>the blonde girl
Again, it's the heartless men who would break up with her light-speed for no reason. Why are japanese males so cruel?
>office girl
The MC wouldn't step up in high school and allowed her to be taken by someone else. What a coward!

Is it really too much to wish for a waifu to have sex with multiple that can be unironically accountable for her decisions and maybe even be proud about it?

Who hurt you?

>>280053289 (OP)
japs are the biggest midwit hyper-rational redditors. they'll only accept liking whores if it's not their fault. they're too virgin to not ignore the fact that it doesn't even matter.

it's the result of otaku-specific autism that demands all the girls must be pure, see also the way idols and VAs are expected to act to sell such a fantasy
what really gets my noggin a'joggin' is the weird angle of plausible deniability that comes up not only with "ironic sluts" but pretty much any stereotypical love interest
like if you wanna read any indulgent romance story, you will inevitably get to some retarded drama with exs (but we never even held hands or kissed so it totally doesn't count, mc-kun) or another surprisingly close male (who is actually my brother who came to visit from overseas, no need to be jealous)
which i guess prolongs the story, that's why indulgent romance goes on for hubdreds of chapters, but still seems like a stupid half-measure that pissess off both purityfags and slut apologists
in the same vein, i have no idea for rent-a-girlfriend even got so big, when the vert premise of the story is ALL THE LOVE INTERESTS ARE LITERAL WHORES IN EVERYTHING BUT NAME, isn't that heresy for any otaku-centric story? or is average romcom enjoyer so stupid that there is no cognitive dissonance?

>>280053289 (OP)
the problem with holo is that she flirts with every guy she sees

Getting mad at someone who’s immortal or over 100 years old having multiple partners is ridiculous.

>>280055971
no one's getting mad at that. but you are getting mad at anyone calling her a whore