Thread 280731200 - /a/ [Archived: 214 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:12:54 AM No.280731200
IMG_1854
IMG_1854
md5: 8ec3fd62a329f7953d3e6bb76d8ace1b🔍
>Eiken was panned by critics for being "obscene" and "lacking substance". Jason Thompson gave the manga a zero-star rating in his review of the series in his Manga: The Complete Guide, calling it "[a]ctual pornography disguised as romantic comedy pseudo-pornography".[17]

>Stig Høgset gave the anime a one-star review on THEM Anime Reviews, calling it "one of the most exploitative, demeaning anime titles I have ever seen". He went on say that "Eiken is like an hour-long nightmare of sexual innuendo of the creepy kind... you'll never find a bigger collection of 'wrong' anywhere else."[1]
Replies: >>280731255 >>280731339 >>280731496 >>280731908 >>280731965 >>280733603 >>280734268 >>280736222
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:15:24 AM No.280731255
>>280731200 (OP)
lol homos for sure
Replies: >>280732152
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:17:31 AM No.280731315
The most vile creature ever animated
The most vile creature ever animated
md5: 0b7c4084e3e6048e85e975cfb5592e78🔍
The normalfag fears the big bobs.
Replies: >>280731339
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:19:04 AM No.280731339
5fc5f025ef8aa
5fc5f025ef8aa
md5: db153c56ab115fcab75d4e774acda8cb🔍
>>280731200 (OP)
>>280731315
B-BOOBA!!!!!
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:24:01 AM No.280731455
1785656363463
1785656363463
md5: 93c57185ffe6c32db84db3f52c94cb02🔍
I am disgusted and appaled. Won't somebody think of the substance?!
Replies: >>280735097
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:25:44 AM No.280731496
>>280731200 (OP)
What would Roger Ebert think of Eiken?
Replies: >>280731609
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:30:48 AM No.280731609
>>280731496
Ebert loved sexploitation movies and directed one himself
Replies: >>280731816
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:37:39 AM No.280731816
>>280731609
Based.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:40:47 AM No.280731908
>>280731200 (OP)
only lasted 1 season albeit
Replies: >>280732039
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:42:31 AM No.280731965
>>280731200 (OP)
i will now read your manga
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:44:39 AM No.280732039
>>280731908
>lasted
It was an OVA
Replies: >>280733113
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:48:26 AM No.280732152
>>280731255
Nah, they're right, it's terrible. Eiken makes a mockery of male heterosexuality.
Replies: >>280733004
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 2:16:52 AM No.280733004
>>280732152
.t american ass fag
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 2:20:31 AM No.280733113
IMG_7250
IMG_7250
md5: a2464b379a8f273bfbfed1dc98ae5d0c🔍
>>280732039
I heard the manga is more wild
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 2:39:53 AM No.280733603
DD0277BUQAA_Mf0
DD0277BUQAA_Mf0
md5: d9023829c53935d469df17427c8dd9aa🔍
>>280731200 (OP)
Eiken is remembered. Big tits won.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:03:41 AM No.280734268
1636138473649_thumb.jpg
1636138473649_thumb.jpg
md5: 574ccd5d5b7e156fdfc54b7f048144e9🔍
>>280731200 (OP)
Uncultured swines
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:39:56 AM No.280735097
>>280731455
The people who drew this didn't merely think of it, they abused it.
Replies: >>280735195
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:43:44 AM No.280735195
komoeChop
komoeChop
md5: e00bd65d472e6cbeeb0e0f96895d2468🔍
>>280735097
What does that even mean?
Replies: >>280735352
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:49:53 AM No.280735352
>>280735195
It's a mystery to all thirdies.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:03:05 AM No.280735657
Critics don't understand parody or satire.
Replies: >>280735767 >>280735864
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:08:04 AM No.280735767
>>280735657
If critics understood anything they'd be working as creatives rather than just taking potshots.
Replies: >>280736258
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:12:47 AM No.280735864
>>280735657
The only thing critics care about is looking good to other critics and feeling like they got one up on the general audience.
Replies: >>280736258
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:25:29 AM No.280736100
Eiken_thumb.jpg
Eiken_thumb.jpg
md5: 88f0dc67fe8cf12c16ead7ae3f6dee74🔍
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:31:18 AM No.280736222
>>280731200 (OP)
It is a bad anime but the tits are nice.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:33:07 AM No.280736258
>>280735767
Creative work is much harder and pays a lot less.

>>280735864
Critics care only about pandering. If you managed to guess what sentiment the sheeple wants to be confirmed, you have won at criticism. Alternatively, you can take your money from the studios and push their narratives.
In any case, they don't care about their image. They're whores through and through. Critic is not a dignified profession.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:16:41 AM No.280737154
C8fj2MiUQAA6Nzw
C8fj2MiUQAA6Nzw
md5: d8a480b85671258712e51ac26b0245b2🔍
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:23:21 AM No.280737268
Didn’t they make a remake of the manga done entirely with generative AI
Replies: >>280737316
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:26:17 AM No.280737316
1717520881758
1717520881758
md5: bc2526e681a15e93ec892116e44d4b04🔍
>>280737268
Have you see the manga's artwork? This AI remake was the only thing that could ever look worse than that.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 6:07:32 AM No.280738009
1645251934651
1645251934651
md5: 4289a5247635098ba7a89fa8ff649a0c🔍