>>280835561
I've already read Yotsuba several times, so I only come to this threads once in a while, but I can confirm that what this
>>280835895 guy says: the author of
>>280746620 is me, not him.
No idea why you even assumed we were the same person (although you seem to have been schizoposting in this thread too, so it checks out).
Look, I am living in a big city in this very moment (not for long, I'm visiting my gf), and it's not the first time either. I admit that I've made an hyperbole in that post, although to be fair the focus of the post was on architecture so that dystopian bit was just an afterthougth: clearly cities are not inthrinsically "evil" or something like that. What I meant is that in particular modern big city culture is quite often "dystopic" (along with all of the shit it generates, both in architecture and other fields). Of course there are some pretty/distinctive things in them (usually the old ones, go figure why) and a lot of history: obviously big cities had an important role in history and culture, it doesnt' take a genius to know that.
Still, it's not exactly the most natural living environment for the typical human (or any animal) since the bigger the size, the more they get artificially detached from the actual reality of life, and this starts becoming a problem as cities become increasingly populated and artificially dense/huge. But I can't be bothered to write a whole essay (also no space), so I'll just uncerimoniously throw in the behavioral sink
as an example and be done with it.
But relax: nobody is forcing you to live outside of a big city either although I do really wish that countries implemented tyrannical measures in cities such as population limits and strict anti-sprawling to fix this. And hopefully dtuff like smart working will start depopulating big cities a bit.
I will probably disappear for another thread or two, so enjoy having the last word if you're still cranky about this.
