>>935664772>You’re using the false assumption fallacy to put words and ideas in other people’s mouths in order to lob ad hominems at themNothing you say has rhetorical merit
Lmao you don’t even know what you’re saying. You’re just throwing out buzzwords hoping it makes you sound smart.
Let’s break it down, since you clearly can’t:
>False assumptionI responded directly to your post:
“Obama put kids in cages too! Triggered yet, shithead?”
That’s not a “false assumption.” That’s me calling out the whataboutism you wrote yourself.
You're implying “Trump did it but Obama did it too, so it’s fine.” That’s the fallacy, yours, not mine.
>Ad hominemCalling you a fag and loser after breaking down your argument isn’t a fallacy.
If I led with an insult and said nothing else, maybe. But I laid out:
Trump’s zero tolerance policy
Family separations
No reunification system
Kids still not back with their parents
That’s not “ad hominem.” That’s facts, then mockery. Learn the difference.
“No rhetorical merit”
Bro, I literally dismantled your argument and you came back with a debate club tantrum.
You got called out, had no counter, and now you’re hiding behind words you Googled.