Thank God for dead magats

>>935698356 (OP)
nah, that just means they can't suffer through the country they voted for.

Michael Byrd will be put on trial. Either by the law, or by the public. And he would not like the public's idea of a "trial".

>>935698356 (OP)
She gave her life for Israel

>>935698580
Why? He's completely innocent of any and all crimes. She was shot for forcefully breaking into a Capitol building. I know your tiny little maga brain can't comprehend that actions have consequences but at least try

>>935698664
There's this thing called "murder", son. And he needs to be found officially "not guilty" of it. By one court, or another. If the law won't do it? We will. And you REALLY wouldn't like how our court works.

>>935698664
They're just mad because a black cop shot a white lady. Reverse the races and they'd be fine with it.

>>935698793
Sure kid. Meanwhile he will be sipping martinis and fucking white women while you rage in your mom's basement.

>>935698793
>murder

>>935698356 (OP)
insurrectionist social media cult members belong on a pike

>>935698356 (OP)
Deserved.

>>935698580
Retarded much?
He won't spend a single day behind bars or be subjected to your faggy "justice" so cry.

The real problem with divisions of species isn't that they are just guidelines, but that nobody can agree on the rules. Evolutionary biologists have proposed almost 30 different species definitions (called "species concepts") over the years, and none of them apply to all organisms. For example, the "no fertile offspring" definition is a paraphrase of one of the most popular species concepts called the Biological Species Concept (BSC), which actually states that a species is "a population or group of populations reproductively isolated from other such groups". "Reproductively isolated" in this case can mean "no fertile offspring", but it can also mean "they never encounter each other" or "they don't see each other as potential mates". The problems with the BSC are: 1. it doesn't work for organisms that reproduce asexually, 2. lots of organisms we would otherwise call different species have hybrids from time to time, and 3. reproductive isolation is actually really difficult to test (many organisms will hybridize in captivity but almost never in nature). As I said, there's like 30 more definitions of species that have been proposed, and most of them are slight modifications of other species concepts to fix problems with them (and introducing new problems lol). Some researchers have tried to come up with a definition that unifies all these different definitions (e.g. "a species is an independently-evolving metapopulation lineage"), but unified definitions fall apart because they're almost impossible to apply in the real world (how do you determine if something is "independently-evolving" or part of a metapopulation?).