Thread 935727642 - /b/ [Archived: 1116 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:00:16 PM No.935727642
1721506703444630
1721506703444630
md5: fe6b510c78f580a53782bc3fffeb3a0c🔍
Do you think its morally acceptable to make pornographic drawings of real life women? Pic is Temmie Chang the artist for undertale and deltarune.
Replies: >>935727758 >>935728442 >>935729649 >>935732936 >>935733348 >>935733439
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:03:55 PM No.935727758
1738704694621371
1738704694621371
md5: 653192fc6e0b3e7578dd44fd5cebffa8🔍
>>935727642 (OP)
It absolutely is, or rather, i would argue it is neither morally correct or incorrect in most philosophies. It is neither to be encouraged nor discouraged, simply allowed. The same goes for depictions of underage or seemingly underage girls based on real life people.
The only objection i have for picrel is that i don't remember Temmie having fucking G-cups but hey, artistic freedom so not my place to really say i guess
Replies: >>935732318
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:05:55 PM No.935727837
1722859382287041_thumb.jpg
1722859382287041_thumb.jpg
md5: f52e547bd1a94d7509f73116152d58b0🔍
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:08:54 PM No.935727941
E
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:24:15 PM No.935728442
>>935727642 (OP)
yes, i think it's completely okay for women to want to appear on porn.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:40:59 PM No.935729083
yes, it's based
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:55:41 PM No.935729649
>>935727642 (OP)
>drawing
pretty sure that's aislop.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:03:14 PM No.935729952
It's absolutely morally acceptable. But it's still something people will find disgusting when they think about it.

So create art of your friends, their moms, your sisters, whoever. Just don't be a disgusting and let them find out.

Nobody wants to think about their parents fucking. The same is true of folks who create sexual art involving actual people.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:53:04 PM No.935732024
I think its highly immoral to dictate what people are permitted to see and draw. To the point where I think would be censors should be shot like feral beasts.
I admit its kinda a dick move if you make a point to represent a person knowingly and not just a character resembling or based off them in a manner they would prefer to not be represented in.
Still for that drawing I see no reason to oppose it. Certainly not to placate anyone. To me it is just another piece of art. All drawings of humans tend to resemble someone regardless of if the intent was there or not. If you want to censor it on behalf of someones feelings you might as well dump all creative works in the bin. Instead of a tragic thing like that the correct path is advocating for liberty, mutual respect, and the maturity to endure things we would prefer to not see.
Humanity has already gone much too far down the dystopian path. The moral thing to do is turn back.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:59:15 PM No.935732318
>>935727758
I disagree, considering that the subject is not a figment but a real person who you are infringing on with the act. So morally acceptable, perhaps not. Morally understandable, forgiveable, maybe.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:13:07 PM No.935732936
00135-2365621358
00135-2365621358
md5: 36c3ccd6953eab4b68b7f7bec6eeb399🔍
>>935727642 (OP)
>Do you think its morally acceptable to make pornographic drawings of real life women? Pic is Temmie Chang the artist for undertale and deltarune.
Yes, if they were a particularly loathesome woman. Sometimes perverts with obsessions are a form of karmic justice for the mistreatment and egotism they exhibited.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:22:29 PM No.935733348
>>935727642 (OP)
Yes.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:24:37 PM No.935733439
>>935727642 (OP)
Moral correctness does not exist. There is no right and no wrong in the world. Do what thou wilt.