So it turns out it's the left who is full of close minded bigots, while tight is open minded free thinkers. Who knew.

>>935736966 (OP)
The tight?

>>935736966 (OP)
>it's on the internet so it must be true

Russia should be destroyed.

>>935736966 (OP)
Anyone that actually talks to people.
The left doesn't accept anyone going against their narrative. They treat them like heretics.

>>935736966 (OP)
Dude, but there is million ways to be wrong and only one way to be right. Can you see how that can explain it too?

>>935737026
>It's the roooooskis! They pay agents to come on /b/ and argue with retarded autists!

>>935736966 (OP)
So the left has clear ideology and values and the right is a smorgasbord of shite?

>>935737140
>Rigid dogmatic thinker proves the point
kek

>>935737180
lol...you dumbfucks keep proving the OP correct.

lots more “diverse” “thinking” is possible when disregarding any logic, consistency, and human decency

>>935737180
The party that spounts on and on that they are accepting and tolerant isn't actually accepting and tolerant

>>935737187
How many valid solutions exist for the expression 2+2?

>>935736966 (OP)
>Political Right is full of psychotics and schizophrenics that believe anything from alien dinosaurs living underground controlling the world, to flat earth, to giant sky-men eternally judging us
>Political Left is literally just people who believe that everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, water, housing, clothing, and medical care.

Sounds about right.

>>935737336
We're not talking about 2+2, we're talking about complex human interaction among many millions of people who are all individuals, not clones of each other.

>>935737140
>>935737180
>>935737145
can't make this shit up. libs gonna lib

>>935737250"You WILL agree with what I have to say or else you are a racist fascist Nazi"

>>935737250
>anyone who doesn't think exactly like me is wrong!
It's pretty fucking hilarious how you libs keep proving over and over itt that OP is correct.

>>935737187
No. You somehow didn't get it. I meant that left is correct because it is using more of those "singlehandedly right ways".

>>935737523
>If you don't think exactly like me, you are wrong!

>>935737390
flip the parties in these two statements for better accuracy

the left doesn't have the frame of mind or the people to provide said qualities of life. most leach off the system that the right builds and maintains.

>>935736966 (OP)
Is this just going to be reposted every day now? Anyone whose brain is larger than a peanut isn't going to read a headline and instantly believe it.

>>935736966 (OP)
Or because there's one truth, and if you're literate you can find it, and if you'd an uneducated illiterate retard, your beliefs will vary to an outrageous extreme. This is the actual reason.

>>935737691
Well, the libs in this thread are all screeching that only they are right and everyone else is wrong, so rather proves the point.

>>935737594
Dude, I don't know if you realize but I never asked you to tell me I"m correct about any certainty. Just consider that explanation and you will realize it.

>>935737390
Just the opposite, in fact.

https://www.psypost.org/antagonistic-narcissism-and-psychopathic-tendencies-predict-left-wing-antihierarchical-aggression-study-finds/

>>935736966 (OP)
People who answer math questions, a lot of people will end up with the same answer. But there is a wide variety of ways to go wrong and come up with unique answers.

>>935737758
You're posting on an open forum, retard. No one gives a shit if you don't like what they have to say. Go back to red dit if you want a safe space.

>>935737257
I saw it on Twitter earlier and the questions were all ethical and the let's response was generally "all humans deserve human rights" which is why they're so clumped together, and the right would argue that Hispanics don't deserve rights, and another group would say they do but the gays don't, and another would say they do but the blacks don't and so forth and so forth, which is why they're so spaced out

>>935736966 (OP)
Leftism is about greater equality while rightism is about greater stratification. White supremacists, black supremacists, Christian fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, etc are all right wing ideologies. Obviously doesn't mean they agree with one another.

>>935737639
Lol. Last time I checked blue states are generating GDP while red states are on social security

>>935737849
Complex human interaction isn't math.
It's funny how you guys keep proving OP right with your rigid thinking.

>>935736966 (OP)
okay now post the thoughts.
let's see the diversity of thought on the right so we can understand why "diversity" is good

>>935737883
>I saw a fellow lib post that this is wrong! Take that, chuds!

>>935737865
Lol, the fuck you even want to talk about? You don't get anything and I fuck your ass, nigger.

>>935737922
>Only rigid ideological thinking I agree with is correct. Punish those who wrongthink!

>>935737953
>ESL retardation

>>935737951
It was just the questions they asked to get that data. >>935737894 sums it up pretty well

>>935738036
>trust me bro!

>>935737414
Who pays tariffs? This question has as definite an answer as 2+2 but somehow I've never seen a conservative get it right.

>>935737750
Yeah, its crazy, because when you read books, you and everyone else who read books all arrive at the same conclusions. Because, again, there is *one* truth.

And if youre a retard, your beliefs will be scattered based on no clear rational reason. You can twist it all you want to think that means youre more open minded, but that isn't what it means. It means your beliefs are based in no solid source and you just choose your beliefs based on feelings which can differ a lot from the next retard like you..

>>935736966 (OP)

The “diversity of thought” on the right is a grab-bag of whatever convenient bs they believe in this week to absolve themselves of responsibility or consequences.

Flat earth? Seed oils? Trickle down economics? Whatever, as long as someone tells me that I don’t need to change and that eggs are too expensive. I'm so glad I'm not some stupid right-winger

You don't see a flawed methodology with a study like this?

Question: "Do you agree or disagree? I hate gay people."

Right-wing 1: agree

Right-wing 2: disagree

Right-wing 3: little bit agree, little bit disagree

vs.

Left-wing 1: disagree

Left-wing 2: disagree

Left-wing 3: disagree

Wow, right-wingers have a wide range of diversity of thought! Trumpets aren't smart enough to actually read the study though, so the headline and picture is all they need.

>>935736966 (OP)
>Sourceless /pol/ inforgraphic
>I source it
>Source is discredited german crackpot, member of AfD
>
>Some of the tiny sample group were paid to participate
>Others were not
>
>We can all see where this is going

>>935737639
You absolute buffoon, the left is the only side with the frame of mind to provide said qualities of life. There is no such thing as "leaching off the system" the system is built to provide "From each according to her ability; to each according to his need".
The right only knows force and slave labor, it has no viable system to be leached off of. Any and all infrastructure and maintenance currently done is done through leftist ideals.

>>935737806
Ah, yes, a study looking exclusively at "Leftists" who held "Authoritarian" beliefs because literally all of the other findings found that all Authoritarians were Right-wing. And it found out the few they could find had psychological disorders. Brilliant "proof" you got there, definitely from unbiased sources. Learn to read, shit-for-brains.

>>935738202
I like your point but I'd have gone with something objective, not opinion based. Like this anon >>935738086 who pays the tariffs?

Simple, straight forward, objective answer. The importer. Ask oeope on the left, most will say "whoever is importing the product" ask the right, there's a lot of.. what are they calling it? Diversity of thought.. on the answer..

>>935738278
You telling me the political group knows for lying about every single issue and who hold zero convictions on their principles are ... lying?

>>935738094
So, you're saying every university student thinks exactly the same way, and there is only a single right way of doing things?
Friend, you're an idiot and you're again proving the OP right.
Damn, I didn't realize the left had gotten this bad. Hivemind groupthink. Anyone who disagrees is guilty of wrongthink and should be shunned.
This is right out of 1984. The sort of rigid servility that lets authoritarians take power.

>>935738202
>Retarded fantasy about people I hate

>>935738321
>all of the other findings found that all Authoritarians were Right-wing
Source?

>>935738368
Ok let's try again.
So, youre right about everything, right? If yiure right about everything, will everyone else on your side think exactly like you? Or will there be a massive diversity of answers?

Who pays the tariffs, anon? Is there one answer for 500?
Will there be a diversity of thought on this on the side who is correct? Or the side who is wrong?

>>935738360
You're talking about leftists now, huh?

>>935737008
Statistics do suggest rights are tighter than lefts.

>>935736966 (OP)
It's because leftists have hard ideals while rightards make it up as they go along.
They agree on being evil cunts, but disagree on the exact details.

>>935738394
Who pays tariffs?

>>935738456
>So, youre right about everything, right?
No, I'm not so arrogant as to believe that or to think that there is only one right way of doing things. That is the sort of arrogant and dogmatic thinking of a fanatic.

>>935738500
The wealthy people importing the goods. Many times they will then pass on the costs to the consumer.

>>935738465
Its boffum if we're being honest. We aren't politicians so we can be honest, might as well.

>>935738499
>Only I am right
Time and time again, leftists showing themselves as arrogant and dogmatic, proving OP correct.

>>935738094
Ofc, everyone who reads the communist manifesto all believes in communism

>>935738368
The left tends to have similar goals but a difference of opinion on how to achieve it. Some believe in violent revolution while others don't; some believe ideologies like religion and gender identity should be protected like biological traits such as race while others believe that only people and not ideas have rights. The right, meanwhile, has a difference of goals and ways to achieve it. Whereas believing people are fundamentally equal represents one belief system, believing X group is superior represents as many belief systems as you can fill groups for X.

>>935738499
Gay chicken but with atrocities.

>>935738368
...except almost all the authoritarians in power around the world now are from the right.

sage for /pol/faggotry

>>935738516
Anon. Who. Pays. The. Tariffs.

How would we answer this question. How would we find the answer? What would the chart in OP look like if everyone on the left knew how to read and find that answer, and the right largely had no clue and just clapped like retards and said whatever they thought made the most sense to them or whatever trump said?
If everyone on the left says "the importer" and on the right people said "China. The manufacturer, the importer, the customer, Chinese citizens. Biden" what would that chart look like?

It isn't arrogance. Its the fact you have people who learned how to find factual information, and people who didn't, and think that makes them smarter somehow.

>>935738632
So, you're saying that the left has less diversity of thought and is more dogmatic.

>>935738605
It's not arrogance if you're right.

>>935738640
Source?

>>935736966 (OP)
Ohhh this threads again.
Political division, finger pointing so we don’t absolutely rebel against the real tyranny.

>>935738671
They have less diversity of thought because there are less ways to subdivide leftism. Equality is equality; supremacy comes in effectively infinite forms.

>>935738669
I already answered you.

>>935738428
It's literally in the article that was linked:
“We were interested in the psychological factors behind authoritarianism, There is a wide range of literature and research in the field of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). However, research on authoritarianism observed in individuals who are supportive of left-wing political ideologies are still rare.”

They couldn't find studies on authoritarianism observed in individuals who are supportive of left-wing political ideologies, so they set out to find the extremely few, rare cases, and made a study on them, and found out that they had Antagonistic narcissism and psychopathic tendencies, like the majority of those with Right-wing beliefs. So your article demonstrates the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you think it does.

Your a retard if you think about politics

>>935738690
It's arrogance when you are certain you are right due to your own ego in regards to complex interactions with no one answer.
Do you really no see how you're proving OP correct?

>>935738640
Kim Jong Un? Xi Jinping? Last I checked they are the definition of far leftists

>>935738761
No you didnt. And youre avoiding answering it directly for a reason. Because you know, but admitting you're wrong means taking a good long hard look at what a huge retard you are.
Because its more than just tariffs isn't it?

Its like doing a math test and some students got 100%, and the students who got zero and all compared answers and saw theirs were all different and the kids who did well all answer the same and thinking "haw haw! We're free thinkers"
No you aren't. Youre stupid.

>>935738795
You know the statement you cited doesn't support your conclusion, correct?

>>935738743
So Op is correct, and you like that the left is less diverse and more dogmatic, rigidly adhering to a single ideology and allowing no wrongthink.

>>935738870
I directly answered you here
>>935738555
Retard

>>935738884
Less diverse in thought, yes. As for dogmatic: is physics "dogmatic"? It provides far fewer explanations for the creation of the universe than religion does. Does that make science somehow more dogmatic than religion?

>>935738555
>wealthy people
Small business owners aren't wealthy.
>Many times they will then pass on the costs to the consumer.
Always, unless it's a small business that's just gone bankrupt.

>>935738929

Somehow youre still wrong.
*any importer*. If you order something overseas youre paying it too. Not just rich people.

How does the rest of the right fair with this question? I've heard a lot of them (trump included) claim China pays it.
Very, very diverse answers anon.

>>935738640
Buddy there are no political parties. It’s the elite and the unwashed masses. The eaters.
Stop falling for this divisive false dichotomy

>>935738966
Political ideology is not psychics.
Are you really this fucking dumb?
Let me guess, humanities major?

>>935736966 (OP)
left values are simple
oppose hatred/bullying/abuse
support the victims
strive to live in peace and reduce world suck

rightoids:
hate jews
hate women
hate gov
hate LBTQ++++++++++++++++
worship daddies like trump, alex jones and tate
constantly belittle everyone different than your cult
be selfish
fuck the libs above own interest
nuke enemies of my state
gib fri moni
more guns = more safe
drive big trucks
project personal insecurities on others
be narcissistic and never at fault
closed mind only trust people from my tribe and echo chamber
conspiracies are facts
everyone saying shit about anything i like = fake news and shill YWNBAW
praise the lord
musk is my daddy, witness me

etc etc etc you are driven by hate and want to bully others into thinking you are relevant. rightoids should be culled so we can move on as a species and ascend beyond this galaxy

meanwhile constant wars and opression going on, fun timeline and generation to live in.

>>935738966
Aren't you faggots the ones saying trans women are real women? Bending reality to match your political ideology isn't scientific

>>935739046
No, the people importing the goods pay the tariff.
And you realize your argument can be used in regards to any business taxes, right?

This is just picking issues, staking out an opinion, and then plotting the results. Half of them range standard and half of them lean one way because they chose pretty conservative stances
>Q 1) Abortion should be illegal.
Yeah most people don't think it should be illegal for all cases no exceptions. Congrats, that broadens the chart on the right because that's not where the country is.
>Q 5) Lesbian, gay and trans couples should be allowed to legally marry.
Gay marriage is just a fact of life now, anyone saying anything other than Strongly Agree is conservative by definition, broadening the variety of opinions on the right.
>Q 6) The government should regulate business to protect the environment.
The framing of this in all the examples is fucking terrible because you're not measuring how MUCH they should be regulated, it's IF they should be at all. Most people understand that clean air and water are decent things to strive for.
>Q 8) The federal government should make a concerted effort to improve social and economic conditions for African Americans.
This is a shit question because it's 2 in 1 again. You have the range of people who think the government should or should not try to improve conditions for people at all, and then you have the range who think racial disparity is an issue. If you keep adding conditions then yeah it's going to broaden to one side.

>>935738879
I know that it explicitly supports my conclusion. They couldn't find data that supported their hypothesis, and so their entire goal of the study was to find data to support their predetermined hypothesis.

>>935739070
>made up stereotypes showing I'm the good guy and the people I hate are bad
You cannot make up how rigid, dogmatic, and fanatical leftists are presenting themselves.

>>935737026
Yep

>>935739152
You're show an inability to read journal articles and understand them to any degree.

>>935737145
Go die in a ditch for Putin’s land grab

>>935739096
If you order something from overseas. You are rhe importer. You pay the tariff. I had a friend who doesnt watch the news get nabbed with a huge tariff for a sweater even. Thats how it works. You can prove it within 2 weeks if you go on alibaba. (Which brings us back to "how to verify things". This is something you CAN prove with an experiment but choose instead to be dumb)

And that's beside the point. You said rich people. Trump says China. The answer is importer.

Lets refer back to the chart in OP shall we? What does that chart look like for all these 3 right wing answers to the question? How does the left look if the vast majority of them say "the importer"

>>935738869
And they are a small minority compared to the world as a whole.

>>935739208
>show
showing

>>935739063
Science shows that there is less diversity in global human genetics than between groups of chimpanzees in neighboring regions. So a belief in human equality is not particularly dogmatic; certainly less so than unsupported beliefs in supremacy.

And my education taught me the difference between physics and psychics.

>>935739076
Trans stuff is heavily pushed by capitalist entities. And I agree, it's not scientific.

>>935739233
No one gives a shit about that faggot Putin, you retard.

>>935739309
Sure, yevgeny

>>935739152
No, lack of studies does not inherently equate to lack of something being studied or why it is being studied. That's like saying paleolithic people didn't get cancer because we don't have oncologists records from 10000 BCE. Very, very basic logic fail. You may be correct about rightists having a more authoritarian lean than leftists and I have in fact seen headlines saying the similar, but your argument is garbage.

>>935739096
Holy fuck imagine being this dumb publicly. Good thing only the jannies know your IP.

>>935739299
And I have a degree in Biology. I'm quite aware of genetic diversity. Physics is still not political ideology, and complex human interactions are not controlled by rigid laws of nature.
That you seem to think they are shows a complete lack of understanding of both science and philosophy.

>>935739353
>anyone I disagree with is a Russian agent!!!!\
retard

>>935739299
Why do you guys always think about trannies?

>>935736966 (OP)
right wingers may have missed out on that whole diversity thing
but they have every sort of wrong answer. no tinfoil conspiracy theory will ever get left behind.

>>935738465
No, I'm talking about the dishonest cretins that will twist what someone said to conclude the exact opposite of what they were saying. In other words, thank you for proving my point. You right-wingers constantly lie.

>>935739441
QQ

>>935739415
It is not dogmatic to follow what is supported by the available facts. Your appeal to authority fallacy doesn't change reality.

>>935739404
What part is wrong? You seem to be unable to address it and just resorted to name calling.

>>935739469
Actually a fucking nigger

>>935739441
I mean if your rhetoric is the same as Russian propaganda what do you expect people to think?

>>935739468
So you're talking about leftists. Got it.

>>935739446
What "guys" do you think I am?

>>935739489
Stay in school, kiddo.

>>935737390
This shoulda been /thread

Rightfags coping and inventing "data" to counter this.

>>935739496
Whiter than you are. And not some retard NEET living in mommy’s basement either.

>>935739487
What authority am I appealing to?
Do you not understand what that means?

>>935739515
Point proven. Ignore what your opponent is saying so that you can tell an outright lie instead.

>>935739504
What rhetoric is the same as russian propaganda, retard?

>>935739516
Try to keep up.

>>935739530
I have already completed graduate school, kiddo. Now tell me about your sociology degree.

>>935739580
Playing dumb won’t get you anywhere fast, bucko.

>>935739515
Damn, you've been brain washed quite thoroughly. Couldn't see the truth if it shoved its tits in your face.

>>935739574
You made some unsupported claims. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

>>935739599
Who me? STEM degree and business degree. Do you make $200k?

>>935739558
You are saying having a degree means you are correct because you can not respond to my argument any other way. I repeat: a political system based on factual information is not dogmatic, it is simply factual.

>>935739602
So, you're just talking shit and have no real idea what's supposed to be "exactly the same" as Russian propaganda.
Retard.

>>935739070
i dont hate anyone, unless they cause others harm
magatards and other right of the world can lead their lives they way they like, but as soon as you get involved and start supporting wars, discrimination against minorities or women, racism, biggotry and forced control of rights, then you become trash and a waste of space.

hatred reserved for severe cases = terrorists, pedos and crazy country leaders

you are just a regressive slime

>>935739635
Over. Stem MS and BS.

>>935739635
>>935739685
>Muh STEM degrees
No wonder Americans read at a 2nd grade level.

>>935739208
I would feel the same about you if I had believed that you read the article at all, instead of just bookmarking it to "own the lefties".

Please re-read my first post, and try to think about how the Political Left's primary goal is truly about helping everyone, and the Political Right's main goal is to oppress certain demographics so that there can be a class of "haves" and a class of "have-nots".

The only thing the left is intolerant of is hate and bigotry against people for things that are intrinsic to a person. The right will create intolerance and out-groups based on things that are intrinsic to people.

>>935739660
No I'm not. I was saying I have a degree in biology and understand genetic diversity, and then made the point that political ideology is not physics, with physical laws.
Complex human interaction does not follow rigid physical laws, and you're an idiot if you think it does.

>>935739588
Not an answer.

>>935739742
Fuck of back to your shithole, faggot.

>>935739753
I disagree. The left has no morality or ideals, just a will to power and a cover of false righteousness.
You can just look at the leftists spewing hatred in this thread to see the lie of your position.

>>935739810
I am American so you would be correct.

>>935739630
You are the evidence, dipshit.

>>935739782
My argument is that
a) Leftism IS less diverse in belief because the belief in human equality is less diverse than alternatives
b) This way of thinking can not be considered dogmatic because it is supported by the facts at hand
I used the Big Bang Theory as an example that ways of thinking based in fact and science can not fairly be called dogmatic. The only one saying that all human behavior and interaction can currently be quantified by physical sciences is you; that is a strawman fallacy. Your education sure didn't teach you how to make a basic argument.

>>935739987
>Leftism IS less diverse in belief because the belief in human equality is less diverse than alternatives
This is so stupid.

>>935739987
It's not a "strawman"
Question for you-- are you a communist and do you believe that communist ideology is "scientific"?

>>935739982
Rage more, cuck.

>>935740154
Not an argument.

>>935740164
You are misrepresenting my argument, which you still have yet to respond to factually, in order to try and gain an advantage. That is in fact a strawman.

And I am not a Communist; it's a failed ideology. I'm a liberal centrist who supports the mixed economy model. But even if I were, trying to discredit my argument based on that fact would be yet ANOTHER fallacy. So while we're trading personal credentials, please tell my the university that gave you your BS so I know never to go to any professional with that hanging on their wall.

>>935740385
You're right, you can't argue with stupid.

>>935740385
I just asked you a question because you seem to hold the opinion that human interaction can be rigidly defined. And if you support a "mixed" economy, you aren't centrist.

the left has gone into a purity spiral, that they mirror religious nutjobs

color me shock.

>>935736966 (OP)
Source: Trust me bro

>>935740933
The funny part is the lefties get really mad at this, then spend the entire thread saying there is only one right way of doing stuff and everyone not exactly like them is wrong.

>>935740630
Still not an argument.

>>935740752
No, you claimed that. Hence the strawman. And a mixed economy is centrist everywhere that isn't scared shitless about the very word "socialist". It has elements of the free market and the planned market while avoiding the extremes of either. Thus it is exists towards the "center" of possible systems.

>>935741136
Indeed, you can't win an argument against a stupid person.

>>935741161
And if you don't even try to make an argument the whole world sees how hollow your beliefs actually are.

>>935741047
And righties spend the entire thread revealing themselves to be horrible people

>>935741047
>>935741297
We've just seen that 4chan is full of ignorant people from across the spectrum, from the leftist who takes fiction from a scientific paper to the rightist engaged in fallacies. Of course if you're surprised you must be pretty new.

>>935736966 (OP)
theres an infinite amount of ways to be wrong, but one way to be right.

>>935741554
you get things done by comprising with people of opposing views. you alienate, yourself thinking you have all the answers.

>>935741297
Yeah, those horrible people who aren't angry rigid ideological fanatics like leftists.

>>935741554
You get mad at people who load the dishwasher "wrong" don't you?

>>935739874
The left clearly has morality and ideals, I outlined them for you: they believe that everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, water, housing, clothing, and medical care. They don't care how you dress, or who you love, as long as there is no oppression of others or hatred in your heart. Their anger comes from those that willingly do harm to others.

It is the Right that demonstrably have no morality or ideals. That is why they follow people with false bravado, and mindlessly follow religions, even when their own religious leaders preach things that explicitly go against the teachings in their holy books. Pure false righteousness to claim to follow a religion while ignoring its doctrines of kindness and compassion for your fellow man. They celebrate the "other" having violence committed upon them.

But maybe you're right, maybe the leftifts who are fighting against oppression are in the wrong. Maybe I should take this thread as overwhelming evidence of the left's hatred. And ignore thousands of years of history that clearly shows leftist ideals have created better societies the world over, and Right-wing ideals have only created misery and genocides. You fucking half-wit.

>>935739054
>falling for
Buddy, that's a shill. You're a shipl too.
You are both complicit in a paid for narrative and probably aren't even aware.

>>935741736
so youre the retard that puts the bowls facing upwards so you get all fucking splashed when you take it out, and the spoons into one another so they dont actually get cleaned?

>>935741666
If the views are in good faith about making the world better, compromise and an open mind are reasonable. If someone wishes to subjugate you, you owe them only what is proportional.

>>935740350
Typical rightard. He lost the argument, his lies are not being believed, now he has to resort to insults.

>>935741820
You could have just said "yes"

>>935741846
Take your meds, schizo.

>>935741865
you couldve just called me based without embarrassing yourself

>>935741821
Leftists very consistently show the wish to subjugate everyone else. To allow no wrongspeak or wrongthink.

>>935741942
Yeah, keep up with those strawmans.

>>935736966 (OP)
Not the least bit surprising considering how left wing spaces like Reddit are echo chambers whereas right wing spaces like 4chan and X are for everyone.

>>935741973
You guys have literally spent this whole thread saying so.
Your ultimate goal is single party rule with no checks on the power of your party, like in China.
The model for this in the US is California, which hasn't been a functional democracy in 10 years.

>>935741821
this is what christcucks and nazis thought too. you are no different than them

>>935742065
Oof, yet more strawmans and unsupported claims.

"All right wingers are Nazis and racists who want to kill children"

See how easy it is to misrepresent a whole group of people without any evidence? See what bullshit it is and how it's indicative of a failed education?

>>935742115
Hey, crazy guy is here.
How's the paranoid schizophrenia today, crazy guy?

>>935742115
Nazis wanted to kill people because they were "racially impure". Allies killed Nazis because they were trying to kill everyone. Oppression and fighting the oppressed are not the same thing.

>>935742201
>See how easy it is to misrepresent a whole group of people without any evidence?
Yes, you guys spam such things every day here.
And the crazy dude just showed up and is going to start calling everyone nazis and logfag.

>>935742251
What about the soviets? They just wanted to spread their demented ideology just like the Nazis did.

>>935742058
X is a cesspit
4chan is a cess pit too but it is a fun cesspit

>>935742251
They thought they were doing the right thing for the german people. They were self righteous as you are.

>>935742271
As I said to someone earlier, what "guy" am I supposed to be.

>>935742290
The Soviets were authoritarian pricks and people under their boot had every right to fight back.

>>935742317
>It's a cesspit because people disagree with me and conservatives aren't censored like my safe spaces!

>>935742317
But importantly, unlike Reddit or Bluesky, they aren’t echo chambers.

>>935742347
Killing people based on pseudoscience is not defensible. Nothing self-righteous about saving lives, it's just math. Kill a million to save a hundred million is the only moral option.

>>935742207
you are the one that's schizophrenic, imagine believing that a kike died in a cross and came back as a god.

>>935742347
If people knew you are a Nazi you would get killed on the street like you deserve.

>>935742374
i ilke how you read something and immediatley have your own bad faith version of what the person meant. you must post on X

>>935742472
NTA but same for you as a homosexual.

>>935736966 (OP)
>schizo conspiracy theorists
>free thinkers
I mean I GUESS

>>935742449
so, shortsighted, you say that living now, knowing what happened. but if you were living in 1930's germany you would be goose-stepping.

>>935742545
It is utterly hilarious how the "left" is an exact mirror of 1980s conservatives now.

>>935742587
>schizo response

>>935742545
Ah yes, conspiracy theorist, like how smooth brain left-wingers say Trump's assassination was staged

>>935742566
Most likely, yes. And if I was a dog with rabies I would be biting people. Sometimes people get caught up in bad things, but that doesn't take away the basic human right to defend themselves against those people.

>>935742566
It's pretty common, anon. Most people convince themselves they'd resist, but history shows us not even 1 in a hundred do.

>>935742617
take your meds.

>>935742627
pretty sure thats a /pol trope

>>935742627
>muh q
>muh pizzagate
>muh deepstate
>muh michael obama
>muh shadow government
>muh vax deaths
>muh flatearth
>muh stolen election
plz kill yourselves

>>935742726
pizzagate is real. the rest is all fake.

>>935742587
You're correct that Democrats have been completely bought off by corporations and aren't really left wing anymore, but they're still to the left of MAGA and even 1980s Republicans. Tell me, who supports the current trickle-down economics plan in congress and who has opposed it?

>>935742838
Meds

>>935742888
Clinton killed off the last vestiges of the New Deal and abandoned the working class, breaking the power of the unions in democrat politics.

>>935743914
Perhaps, but the current DFL does not support Reagonomics either. They are not the same as the 1980s GOP.

>>935742648
Half the country is resisting right now. Don't ask me what's wrong with the other half.

>>935742587
That's not true.

>>935736966 (OP)
>Reddit tier “science”posting

You’re all retarded and useless, left, right, center. It’s humiliating sharing a species with you.

>>935744620
Facts don't care about your feelings, snowflake.

>>935744865
Here's a fact: Trump has violated the Constitution multiple times this year.

>>935744929
Proof?

>>935743914
Both Reagan and Clinton were the administrations that set America in it's inexorable path, there is no backing down from it, neither one of the 2 parties care to. Since the great wealth transfer under Obama, after 2008, poverty levels have been constantly increasing, there will be no "redistribution" given finding leeways to avoid (income) taxes, its rich people's forte, and most would get laundered right back through the gov. anyway. One thing is certain : the best days of the US are in the past, conditions for the average person will continue to deteriorate, until the US " fourth turning" in the shape of THE economic collapse happens https://www.progress.org/articles/the-depression-of-2026 https://medium.com/@gotkoin3/a-perfect-storm-the-economic-collapse-of-2025-2026-thekoinblog-com-ac4badf4fa24 https://sonar21.com/joe-biden-is-making-america-a-honduras/ American economy, much like late 80s soviet one, is running on fumes, the loss of blue collar jobs, leaves americans vulnerable to AI automation, some of the Trump policies, although catastrophic for the people/country, are literally the only way out I see.

>>935745631
Sure there was. Democrats could have not pushed forward with NAFTA or the Chinese trade agreements and Most Favored Nation status. Democrats could have chosen to not sell out the unions for Wall St money. Republicans were being Republicans, Democrats pushed through Reagan's agenda after Clinton defeated Bush, largely because of disaffected conservatives not wanting NAFTA and voting for Perrot.
Democrats could have turned it around had they chose. Instead they put an anti-union corporatist into power.

Matthew Dickinson

I consider myself right-wing but not a Tumper. I am more of a neoconservative or business conservative

>>935736966 (OP)
According to this gum wrapper I found at the bus stop, magatards iz smart.

>>935738086
>>935738337

As someone who has worked with multiple international shipping companies, that would depends on the terms of sale, and really, a little bit of both.

FOB [final destination] or CIF is going to be born by the seller, so the company in the country shipping to the country with tariffs. EX WORKS or FOB [port of delivery country] the tariff is born by the buyer.

It's a case by case, contract by contract issue. And it will cause the tariffed country to lower it's prices to compete with non-tariffed countries if it wants EX WORKS or FOB prior to tariff.

It's overly simplistic to say the buyer will bear it - he'll see the tariff in the cost and shift his purchase to a different country, unless the sellers in tariffed country drop their price to match, which they often do, rather than lose the business.

Of course, a real answer is too complicated for Dembeciles just like it is for Republitards.

>>935746320
So basically a democrat who doesn't worship faggots and niggers.

>>935737140
Thats what YOU think. If conservatives weren't more open minded, then explain why they make up the majority of scientists? Explain why most people who create art lean right?

(Also, please dont fact check me)

>>935749770
Because if you're an artist or academic, you don't get to work if you're not paying lip service to the liberal narrative. You will literally lose you job if suspected of being conservative, or just no liberal enough.

>>935741047
Nice straw-man, retard; Specifically when talking about truths, there IS only one of them, it's p∨¬p.

>>935749941
About half of scientists are independent. These are the same scientists that provide factual data that transgender athletes biologically have a physical advantage over natural females (which 80% of America agrees with), sooo, you're basically retarded for assuming.

>>935736966 (OP)
Why do you retards always crop out the website? Are you embarrassed?

>>935750771
It's not a strawman, it's the truth.
Test it for yourself. Just get a MAGA hat and wear it while walking around a college campus.
I dare you.

>>935750975
>Test it for yourself. Just get a MAGA hat and wear it while walking around a college campus.
Do you think they would beat someone up for a hat? How is this relevant to "convergence on truth"?

>>935736966 (OP)
People really see graphs next to a claim and really just take it for fact without actually reading, analyzing, or checking sources. You're a full blown retard op.

>>935751242
Yes, most certainly you would be assaulted.

>>935751396
>living in an alternate reality
XD

>>935749770
>conservatives
>make up the majority of scientists
Ass spelunking the orange menace is not a science

>>935751446
>punch a nazi
>punch a nazi
>punch a nazi
He won't do it.

>>935737013
the left eat each other if they aren't in lock step

>>935751519
Oh yeah? Prove me wrong. Look up how many scientists are republican, and how many are independent or democrat. If you're brave enough tranny libtard nigger cope seeth can't meme etc.

>>935749770
>(Also, please dont fact check me)
Scared of the truth? Why does social conservatism correlate negatively with IQ? Why are the religious (who are heavily conservative, and conservatives heavily religious) so uncommon in science, and also anti-science?

>>935740725
>left v eight
>oh so...penis amirite?
Why are you like this?

>>935751865
>Oh yeah? Prove me wrong. Look up how many scientists are republican, and how many are independent or democrat. If you're brave enough tranny libtard nigger cope seeth can't meme etc.
"A Pew Research Center Poll from July 2009 showed that only around 6 percent of U.S. scientists are Republicans; 55 percent are Democrats, 32 percent are independent, and the rest “don’t know” their affiliation."
From: https://slate.com/technology/2010/12/most-scientists-in-this-country-are-democrats-that-s-a-problem.html
Are you retarded?

>>935752808
They arent, but unlike leftists a scientist that agrees with aspects of the right is also smart enough to not announce it to a bunch of unstable children.

>>935753112
>Falls for what's the most obvious troll in the history of /b/
>Calls someone else retarded.

>>935753142
>smart enough to not announce it
>dey majority persecuted by atheisms niority
You are dumb.
>>935753204
How did I fall for it? I wanted to make you retards look even stupider. ;)

>>935753268
Thats all you have to say about it but i'm dumb...OK.

>>935753297
>Thats all you have to say about it but i'm dumb...OK.
"all you have to say" about republican stupidity?

>>935737013
Where have you been the lasr 20yrs?

>>935753112
To be honest, anyone count as "scientists" even the social scientists who study the "lesbian dances of the native Amazonian tribes", who get funding/grants from democrats, so it is no wonder. What are the figures for the hard sciences ? Bet most are unaffiliated.

>>935736966 (OP)
There are a million ways to be wrong, but only one way to be correct

>>935753725
>To be honest, anyone count as "scientists"
No, you have to do research using the scientific method (which includes peer review). --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method#Elements_of_inquiry and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
>Bet most are unaffiliated.
I bet that most aren't republican (they aren't). --> >>935753112

>>935753909
You're an imbecil, social questions aren't math, each person has their preferences which are as valid as yours. If a man steal from a store, would you consider him evil ?, probably, but if I told you, he stole food from a store to feed dying starving children, would you still think of him as evil ?. Your thinking is shallow, trite, and smug.

>>935754002
Dude, I'm a scientist, all I needed to do was collect some data (asking questions etc...) about common occurring diseases in my area, including spots/sources, use chatgtp to format, then submitted. Scientists are simply people who research a topic under guidance from some institution, then submit their work, once approved, not hard at all for many areas, boom ! You're a "scientist", so I consider myself one ?, no.

>>935754091
He was talking about "true-false" questions, not philosophy 101 dilemmas.
>>935754310
>Dude, I'm a scientist
>so I consider myself one ?, no.
-_-
>Scientists are simply people who research a topic under guidance from some institution
Yes obviously, but your work is still subjected to (and to an extent you via h-index) peer review, and falsifiable by other scientists (you obviously know this.).

>>935742726
>muh stereotypes
>muh compartmentalization
>muh reductio ad absurdum
>muh duality script
Keep at it, NPC.

>>935744929
DC violates the constitution hourly.

>>935736966 (OP)
political right diversity:
-ban abortions
-ban abortions for whites

>>935753058
It's the most accurate political analysis in this thread

>>935736966 (OP)
>there are a million ways to be wrong, but only one way to be right
post lewd dogs or go back to /pol/

>>935754829
The concept of "left right" is kinda obsolete. There are "conservative leftists" and "liberal rightwingers", how would socdems, georgists, or ancaps all fit in such a narrow definition ?

>>935736966 (OP)
This indicates that the left (blue, b) is in strong disagreement and the right (red, per b) is in strong agreement based on the colours assigned in (a)

>>935756546
based on this we can conclude the right agrees on everything and the left can't unite under common grounds

>the left
>people should be decent to everyone if possible and if not possible we should work to improve things

>the right
>10 million different ways to hate people

diversity is their strength

>>935756678

>>935756599
Hnggg I love it when people send this gif as a troll but it gets me so horny

>>935736966 (OP)
That's a lot of reasons to hate the jews.

>>935736966 (OP)
Left wing literally means group think. You stray outside the herd, they'll cancel you, starting with your source of income.

Make because the Left believes in "Treat everyone with fairness and kindness, and help those who need it" while the Right believes one or two of these tenets but then has a "screw you" attitude to the others, and there are many different combinations of yes/no.
Li,e some Right-wingers are anti-abortion but pro-gay rights, and some are exactly the opposite, while most are against both

>>935736966 (OP)
>the tight

>>935752808
>Albert Einstein
Jew who ripped off a bunch of research other guys did, then got credited for it. He was bright, but not as bright as we were led to believe.

>>935759184
How is that news? The only thing people can't do is change their mind

>>935756634
Dude, i'm leftwing, shitlibs aren't left, most people at these protests aren't left, most of them are some kind of amalgamation of people without values. There's a lot to protest against this "beautiful" bill, but given democrats (the protesters puppeteers) support it, red herring/gas lighting is all theyll do.

Lonely and looking for someone to change that... any takers? hoiyo83

>>935760424
its actually the right.

>>935736966 (OP)
>if I can use it to my advantage, then the term “diversity" suddenly isnt so bad
yes, you are always 'diverse' when the situation is clear and factual, thats your USP.

some people believe in aliens, others in the jewish conspiracy, others think about adrenochrome, others only have covid on their minds or cant deal with peoples ideas of sexuality.
it never was important for you to have a common opinion, but you all do agree on hate is good.
that is your common denominator: hate.

we live in a clown world

>>935736966 (OP)
the left used to be the most open-minded, but then harambe attacked and we switched timelines.

>>935736966 (OP)
the right is very accepting of all sorts of free thinkers, like neo nazis, convicted felons, convicted pedos, convicted scam artists, quack doctors, pet killers, drunkards, rapists, all of them currently running the country

>>935756599
>Weirdo leftist spams gay porn in every thread he feels like he's losing the argument in.

>>935761620
>Demonize people you hate so you don't have to come to grips with the failings of your own group
Libs are delusional
A thread filled with narrow thinking, dogmatic ideology, and arrogance about the left with zero introspection
OP is obviously correct, as this thread demonstrates.

>>935736966 (OP)
Diversity of thought lmao
What does that even mean lmao
This is posted by a "thought leader" TedX Talker

Diversity of thought?
How many different thunks you can thank? Different in time, space, biological domains, physical domains, imaginative scope, fantastical extension, realistic calculation, distracted, deficient attentiveness to, specifically, ephemeral, fleeting notions, philosophical inquiry, empirical exploration, actual physical synaptic firing simultaneously across the entire gray matter which would probably be a fkn seizure or a stroke

lmao


WHAT THE FUCK is Diversity of Thought bro

>>935763655
>Yes we're close minded and dogmatic, and we like it that way!
>We're the only good people, everyone else not like us is bad!

>>935763655
It is fucking hilarious how time and time again, libs in this thread prove OP right.

>>935736966 (OP)
Diversity on the right comes from the vast array of conspiracy theories, mostly. They are truly the dregs of society.

>>935763797
>It's true but it's all wrongthink!
Nope. Read the article.

>>935738278
>source less lefty meme about tariffs bad
>meme has red hat in it
>We can all see where this is going

>>935737013
'The sky is blue."
"Yea no, gonna need a source from cnn, and any vid you show me is Probably just AI"

>>935763956
You can't expect anon to believe anything from non-curated lefy approved sources, can you? It might contain wrongthink and lead him into heterodoxy.

>>935742726
Hey waitaminit.

That's actually happening.
Increase in child drug overdoses, increase in pilot and plane deaths and accidents, increase in military shootings and on-base occurrences, increase in social security fraud and serious financial crime from a lack of audits or chain-of-custody detail, decrease in border security, increase in foodborne pathogens due to mishandling, overall increase in disease propagation in immigrant-heavy municipalities...
..huge increase in female educational sex crimes and huge increase in both male and female child-spouse murder-suicides...


Dudes, it's actually happening, COVID-19 that was an attempt to kill massive amounts of people by either direct physical harm or indirect mental degradation.

Judgement is way off, everywhere.

I mean bros seriously we got foreigners in the thousands waving the mexican flag lighting police cruisers on fire, and our military is so soft they are not opening fire to protect our territory and homeland

Judgement is way off bros

>>935737459
Strawman

>>935764157

The flag waivers are paid actors, it's a psi op to to distract from Trump and Musk's break up

>>935737390
You fucks live in a prison of your own minds, it's sucks really you spent so long killing religion only to become one so dogmatic that reciprocation of blame is all but impossible. Frankly I'd rather Christians remain in control, for as prone to hypocritical thought as they are, at least they pretend to be forgiving.
You lot can't. Your new religion has no such compunction against forcing all that don't belive into exile or the grave.

>>935763758
df lmao
I just gave examples of (albeit caricatured) exaggerated thought diversity and the nearest response was "stfu you stupid conservative"

I was ridiculing the idea of Diversity of Thought and I was ridiculed as sending like someone who matched someone who didn't think about diversity of thought while giving examples of POSSIBLE diversity of thought

lmmfao

This thread is fkng AWESOME bro
I'm so fkn down for this shit

I mean dude you can HEAR the homosexuals seething in this thread

They're all "leftist is perfect harmony" and shit lmmfao " I FUCKING HAAAATE WHITE MALE NORMIIIEEES HISSS HISSS SCRATCH MOOOAAAN"

It's rather ironic lefties are usually just disguised authoritarian cunts. It makes a lot more sense when you realize most people are NPC's. They're capable but choose not to be of independent thought. It makes them irrationally angry if you do that and don't conform. Most of them actually are set if they go with the status quo. It immediately worsens their personal situation if they don't go along with it. They're happy to have things get slightly worse over time until it personally effects them.

>>935736966 (OP)
Everyone on the left: Nobody should be oppressed

People on the right:
Person 1: I think black people definitely should be oppressed, but not women
Person 2: Well, I think women should be oppressed, but not black men.
Person 3: Well, I hate the Mexicans!
Person 4: Okay, but I want to oppress anyone who thinks people shouldn't be oppressed
Person 5: It's the muslims for me, they need oppressing. Lets bomb the shit out of them.


Diversity.

>>935764617
*Everyone on the left: Nobody should be oppressed, and we shouldn't tolerate those that want to oppress, AKA, those that break the social contract.

>>935763789
It's so true. I've long tired of the fascination of lib idiocy and self-contradiction, though. I may want em dead and gone now so we may go about our lives in peace and build that Better World.

Like straight up dude, libs are EXTREMELY self-contradictory, pulling so many mental somersaults for ask 6 their pretenses .. and always demanding explanations and REASONS for disliking.

Conservative? Me, anyway? Bro I just don't fucking like X, Y, Z. I didn't have to give an explanation. I just didn't giving like you. Your gross, you're ugly, you bother me. *shrug*

But Diversity of Thought is itself a fake-conservative thread lmao

It's ludicrous to assume we can ascertain a quantitative measure on fundamentally qualitative expressions within a biology ITSELF constrained by a verbal interpretation of either of them.

I'm terms of thoughts, I mean. And aspects of thought: notions, inclinations, ideas, concepts, memories, fantasies, observations, acknowledgement of sensations...

... I'm semiotics, differentiation between the aestheton and noeton.

This thread would be so great if more dumbass libs and weak illiterate homosexuals would continue raging

lmao

I love it it's such a good slide thread

>>935764496
Completely 100% right. The same way most people supported slavery when it existed, or most Germans supported the way jews were treated in the 1930s, so shitlibs support anything, to not "rock the boat", and seem like socially acceptable "good two shoes". non conforming, is seen as an affront against the tribe.

>>935764236
Bro they're getting shot lmao
Yeah there's that report about CHIRLA funding wetback invaders and rioters with our own tax money, and that's obvious if you know anything about cholos, chicanos por la causa, or la raza, that's an easy affirmation.

Paid actors, are, wouldn't doubt it
Does that mean the fires aren't burning and the freeways aren't shut down and the windows aren't broken and the looters aren't looting?

Stick your head up and look around dude lmao

As give if this shit's for real and we gotta, you know, shoot back. Lmao

Bro it's OK to defend your turf, man.
Fucking shoot back, dumbass lmao

>>935736966 (OP)
There is no "right" anymore.
The modern conception of "the right" is basically everyone whom leftists and wokeoids alienated with their bullshit. It's no longer a contiguous platform.

>>935764617
Diversity of Thought and this dude immediately runs to Muh Oppression, Muh Victim

Brought up in public education to look for the victim payout. lmao

WHERE'S THE VICTOM $$$ PAYOUT $$$ MAAAN THERE'S GOTTA BE ONE HEEERE

IM OPPRESSED IM FKNNNG OPPRESSSED

>>935736966 (OP)
If there was a math test, and half the kids got all the answers right, and half the kids got all the answers wrong, and we put that on a graph similar to the OP, what would that graph look like?

If half the population is literate and educated and knows how to learn the answer to questions like "who's pays the tariff" and the other half are a bunch of reactionary retards who base their beliefs on feelings, rage, and shit they made up in their heads, what would that graph look like?
Like if on one side everyone says "the importer" and on the other side most of them actually has no clue, so the answers vary.

>>935764886
Point out exactly what implies that I'm the oppressed one

>>935764617
I'm like dude I'm not trying to enslave anyone, I HATE slavery and oppression. No bro. I want to KILL everyone I didn't like, just eliminate the problem and MOVE. THE FUCK. ON. See? No more room for tolerance, we got no time for that shit anymore

Amazon is drying up, forests are shrinking, groundwater levels are decreasing, pollution is skyrocketing, more retards are breeding (spin doctors call it autism) and humanoid robots are being fielded in law enforcement in end of 2026 and you want to tolerate NIGGER AND SPIC STREET GANGS?

Bro the boomer christcuck space brother satanist-jew-progressive cumma "sammy David jr was a satanist too" era is DEAD lmao

Bro
lmao

Dunno if you noticed or not
But spics and niggers ain't playing that game, dumbass, they're not playing by those TOLERANCE rules, fool.

Kill em all.

Taking slaves is an AWFUL crime, but killing with extreme prejudice is more akin to putting a mortally-wounded animal out of her misery, and honorable.

Dumbass leftist

>>935765069
No. You.

>>935736966 (OP)
Can anyone explain what "right" and "left" politics mean? They seem the same. They both want more taxes, they both want war

>>935765178
Found the Republican

>>935765100
Oppression does not equal enslavement. Post your GED.

>>935765178
Two motivations for war:
* Race
* Territory

Fundamentals of civil war, "bellum civile":
* Fratricide and patricide
* armed conflict within and between cities

And here we are. It only escalates from here.

There are no independents in a prison riot.

>>935765177
Smartest right winger argument/response.

>>935765268
We're happy you understand your terms.
So why are you so stuck on oppression when the slide-thread topic is about diversity of thought?

I'm a far-right extremist. Let me throw you a bone: recipreversexclusions. They're very important in contemporary science and are the basis behind engineering the Somebody Else's Problem Field.

Thoughts? Do you have any other thoughts besides oppression?

>>935765275

False reasoners are often best confuted by giving them the full swing of their own absurdities.
- Charles Caleb Colton

This is so fun. I'm fkn giggling over here dude FEEEED MEEEEE

>>935765378
That wasn't me that you're replying to. The diversity of thought within the right wing is just who to fuck over, not actual intelligent thought. The left are the ones that drive change (conservatism literally means maintaining the status quo, AKA, boot lickers), and that requires thinkers.

>>935765100
If you want to make the world better by killing people, I suggest you start with yourself.

>>935736966 (OP)
this is something i noticed about 10 years ago. it's why i left the left. here's my dick for proof.

>>935765178
I think, theoretically, right is supposed to be more about the rights of the individual, while left, is about caring for the collective. But is WAY more complex than that (pic)

>>935765462
you live in an echo chamber. i gave up on the left because of people like you, and now i just totally ignore politics. if you actually talked to the right and stopped being a total faggot retard you'd realize that they're human beings. you'd also realize that a lot of them want similar shit where it matters.

all your favorite politicians are con artists on par with televangelists. yes, even the "exception" you're thinking of. grow the fuck up.

>>935765684
I speak to right wing people all the time. It's why I know they're illogical and can't be reasoned with. Their beliefs are based on emotion and not reality. No matter how much fact and figures you provide to support your claim, a right winger will never budge. It's like playing chess with a pigeon. You can make all the right moves, but eventually, the pigeon is going to knock the board over and shit all over it, then strut off like it won.

Sure, they're human, but they're stupid humans, and their opinions shouldn't be what drives society, as it has done for decades. The USA for example hasn't had a left wing, or even centrist, government since the 1950s.

>>935765462
I noticed you used "conservative" and "left", strongly implying that typical leftist confusion of right-wing with conservative and left-wing with whatever is contrary to conservative, which COULDN'T be progressive, now could it, because THAT would mean you weren't progressive enough to define a contrarian position exactly contrary to BOTH contrarianism (which is literally what left means, it is CONTRA to ORTHO) and leftism lmao

Leftist brains are EXCEEDINGLY juvenile in this respect.

If I'm contacting anything, it's sanity and territory, I'm honest in that.

So! Diversity of Thought!
Has anyone seen that sky, today? Wow! Talk about BLUE!
Where do you think all the WHITE goes when the SNOW melts?:D

>>935765864

Liar.
Fkng redditor
And you didn't even have the courtesy to quote your source.

https://www.reddit.com/r/quotes/comments/rmm264/dont_play_chess_with_a_pigeon_they_will_just_shit/

>>935765462
Come on come on come on hurry up and push your own original opinion and response, come on, hurry up and be diverse already
be diverse like everyone else

come on
biodiversify your homofolio, faggot

>>935765462
libtards continue to be slow and boring and predictable

This thread is lame now

lates

>>935765978
Conservatism is a right wing ideology, and progressivism is a left wing ideology. These aren't in dispute.

>>935766029
Actually, I saw that quoted on /b/ around 2009. But, good job addressing what I said.