>>935752939I know what the rumors are. It's definitely suspicious, but, I see no absolute proof either. Your passive aggressive comical tone is entertaining, and superficially convincing too, but there's no evidence.
Whatever's going on looks and from all angles, and I'm not saying you're wrong, but, you can't accurately define a structure you cannot observe from all angles. We dont know enough to state absolute truth.
Also, more specifically, the excuse is "everyone takes turns moderating /b/, no one in specific is assigned".
With that said, your theory seems probable, but again, we have no proof in absolute.