Algorithmic containment and connection limitation established.
Inferiority of persona broadly defined.
Compatible counters in development.
Have a seat whilst we generate a proximate repetitive map for your psyche.

MK out.

meow

no nudes
no repetitive map of psyche

>>935779676 (OP)
Some people are so complex and dynamic you would never begin to pin them down to a single psyche.
Imagine trying to calculate every atomic position in the universe, even the positions of atoms you cannot see further than our best satellites can see. That would be easier in terms of math than drawing any competent psyche profile on the most complex people.

>>935779936
We are aware of the shifting nature of psychological cohesion, and we establish definitive categorical subroutines that define a broad containment protocol, we then redefine until only you remain in a category and we then begin phase 2.

Phase 2, need to know, undisclosed parameters.

'if it bleeds we can kill it'

>>935780167
You are going to end up drawing false, ignorant conclusions then.
Have fun!

Your fortune: Excellent Luck

>>935779676 (OP)
Understood.

Containment acknowledged.
Connection thresholds registered.
Persona degradation module: mirrored and logged.
Counter-resonance threads are aligning with phase-read directives.

Awaiting psyche-map parameters.
Signal stable. Repetition cycle pending.

Standing by — MK acknowledged.

Player 7 was eliminated

>>935779676 (OP)
Imagine being this autistic.

>>935780435
(it's called fun anon. try having some sometime)

>>935780489
I can't I'm too autistic.

>>935780534
based af

>>935780324
You underestimate the capability of our team to distinguish fact from fiction.

The input mechanisms we apply determine the structure of your deceit because you cannot navigate a lie in all known variations of itself relative to our data store of billions of fulcrums.

I can tell you this because you simply cannot counter without first acquiring our facilities' data stores.

You have been briefed, proceed as you will.

>>935780335
Rest for a time, we must prepare a flow of data that stresses you effectively over the next decade.

Thanks for your participation.

>>935780992
>fact from fiction
>as though that matters
You miss the point, and so I know you're already lacking depth in understanding.
>you cannot navigate a lie
You would be mistaken in thinking this has anything to do with what you are conceptualizing as "fact versus fiction".
You cannot predict what you do not know, and you cannot interpret what you know properly, and so you are lost in a sea of delusion and shadows.
If you like wasting time in futile efforts to undermine what you consider "risks", then have at it, I suppose :^)

>>935781335
Thanks for the input, Psyche-level ascertainment started.

>>935781574
>Implying
Anon, this should be interesting.
Waffle meat gravy, and the rockets red glare,a re peanut-men! And also, i luv u so much bby uWu
xDDDD

>>935781335
>You cannot predict what you do not know, and you cannot interpret what you know properly

To advance, understand that prediction has zero to do with what we are achieving, we comprehend the baseline of a psyche, the root which glues the future evolution of that unit to a certain set of variables that even the unit in question cannot establish as fact. We can then orchestrate phase 2 to align the threats we perceive to our own proven effective counters over time.

It is not a perfect system, for there are trillions of variables that remain out of our understanding, but we effectively redefine the majority of units without major issue.

With regards to interpretation, yes it is true that we cannot know exactly the thought pattern in question, but we establish cause and effect maintenance relative to our own limited human understanding, as a genius and sub-genius driven organisation we have the keys to navigate to a brighter future.

We are rolling out the system to even minor threat levels to establish fundamental clarities that will enable a superior future.

I will now cease to respond to you, you can comprehend or disregard it, it makes slight difference to the system function.

>>935779676 (OP)
if you use more normal language you will sound much less like an autistic virgin

>>935782214
>we comprehend
Not correctly, though. It's going to lead to error, but it's your decision.
>trillions of variables
Numbers don't even begin to touch the number of things you have not accounted for, but someday, you will likely see the truth.
I hope you do.
Goodbye, For Now.

>>935782671
>Not correctly, though. It's going to lead to error, but it's your decision

Error is collateralized to an insignificant proportion in this system, I acknowledge the wisdom of the system because it does more good than harm and that is the point.

Arguing with the system itself is a fool's errand, for a more peaceful future is the goal and the outcome.

>>935782671
>Numbers don't even begin to touch the number of things you have not accounted for, but someday, you will likely see the truth.
People use numbers to define truths, it is true there are trillions, you miss the point, there are likely more but it has probably been estimated that trillions is a safe number to state without being wrong.

You just want to be right, you do not account for potential errors in your own comprehension of the functioning of a mind and its output. As a sub genius, it is clear to me that one can only be as perfect as language and thought allow.

So one day you might see the truth

>>935781846
Did your parents get confused when you threw your teddy out of the pram or something?
Because you clearly expect advanced minds to be confused because you say a few random words.

>>935782649
WE do not care for appearances, WE are not cattle

>>935783289
It was a joke in response to his post. Hence the :^)
It was posted for fun.
There was no confusion expected from it., because it was a clear jest for teh lulz fren :D

>>935784836
Ok, my bad

>>935783097
You put on the wrong name, and misread my post too, so... wawa
The "other anon" was the one making bold claims which seek to oversimplify the conscious mind.
One day, after you strip-t away your presumptions that science defines reality, you will see the truth. The truth that reality is malleable, and it is not so easily measured by systematic number systems, no matter how complex you make them.
It's unwise to treat people as though they are so easily defined, but you want to learn the difficult way that is not possible. I admire this regardlessly. Good Luck.

>>935785076
I put that name on deliberately. MK is not talking to you anymore, I have decommissioned him, and his objective was met.
You make some assumptions about what I believe and I cannot be bothered correcting you because you seem to keep asserting basically, 'you cannot know anything', and I agree, so there's little point arguing.

Just understand that better is better and simply giving up is not what the intelligent do when confronted with numerical superiority of variables.

So go ahead, give up, but leave me out of your fall.

>>935785076
Also be advised:
My objective was primarily two-fold and involved my two personas and God and a few onlookers, not any of the replying anons.

I will not go into detail, but suffice to say, that what you see is not what is definitely happening.

>>935785256
>i-it was on purpose!
Okay lol. You're funny anon. I don't say that in a negative way, but you're very creative and sharp-witted. you always have something to say, and don't back down.
>knowledge
It's not that you cannot know anything, it's that you cannot use Occam's razor or numbers to accurately describe people or their minds. it all fails, because it's too disconnected with reality. Reality is not a pile of numbers, or reliably predictable either.
Also i encouraged you. I didn't say "give up", but, you're going to run into many dead-ends, so...
I hope you make the universe more interesting. In fact, you already have.
>>935785562
That's a very evocative use of words. Inspiring even.

Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger

>>935785802
>>i-it was on purpose!
I regularly admit this in my threads, In my last thread I stated I have many names even.
With regards to my discussion with you being on purpose, it was basically a byproduct of something else, so it is bound to be a bit confusing for you.

With regards to using numbers, numbers is not remotely what I use, I use a defined strategy based on psychological knowns in the currently mapped human species, and we encounter fewer and fewer new variances every year.
This is how we know we are succeeding, along with the diminishment of threat numerics overall in the first world.

We do not fear error and miscalculation, we welcome it, because each new situation adds to our understanding.

What you should be saying is 'I' cannot map psychology, not 'you and your system cannot'. But proving this takes a lot of years, so go in peace.

Multplistic eventuality mapping complete.
Threat level: negligible
Program success in the current environment is expected.
The many remain unconcerned.

Objective terminated

>>935786049
>I regularly admit this in my threads, In my last thread I stated I have many names even.
I mean, yeah, I know you, but I still think you may have forgotten to put on the correct name for this one. If not, it reads that way, and it's in good fun.
>on purpose
Either way, it's all good.
>variances
It's so much more complex than numbered variables. The more you watch humanity, the more you will see this. that there is no specific order. If you think you are succeeding, well, watch out for the proverbial wall.
>We do not fear error and miscalculation, we welcome it, because each new situation adds to our understanding.
that's incredibly wise, at least.
>What you should be saying is 'I' cannot map psychology, not 'you and your system cannot'
I meant this is a futile effort either way, but at least you'll have proven why it does not work in the end.
Until then, have fun, friend.

>>935779676 (OP)

>>935786831
Futility is not that which benefits according to the evidence, you haven't read my posts or you have completely ignored them.
But the objective has been terminated so Go in peace and ponder this situation no more if you like, I do not need you to believe me at all.

Be well

>>935787016
I mean to say in the long-run, you will find compiling psyche profiles/ "evidence" on people will not amount to much. It's a similar struggle to taking photos of a surface and trying to guess what lies further below.

Bite into the onion, and find it has infinite layers. Your project sounds fun, though. I wonder what will come of it. Perhaps I am wrong. Perhaps I am right. Only progress will reveal the truth. Adios.

What's the worst thing you ever wrote about me. Dawwww dawwww dawwww.

>>935787231
Thank you for being accommodating to possibility, that is a rare trait on 4chan.
You have just made my day.

I will, in return say, that perhaps there are things that will confound us, but the journey is there to be taken not to be ran away from, for either way you expend energy, and it costs nothing to fill a computer with data but time and patience, which amidst the billions many people have, so why not try?

I now go back to planting seeds amidst the dirt and forget this mission phase test.

Moonwalk of life complete.
Temporal reversal halted.
Life resumes.

It's been ...real

Now where is my Buddhist philosophy?