>currently quitting weed
>want to die
it's never been this hard before. i'm restless, moody, irritable, constantly tired. this is day fucking 3.

i want to get high so fucking much. ugh. the nightmares will start soon. probably tonight.

pro tip kids don't smoke weed every day for 4 years, it will fucking you up.

'chu quitting for?

>>935787250 (OP)
>never been this hard before
There's nothing addictive in weed. WTF is wrong with you?

I've been rocking the dugout...

>>935787250 (OP)
All the times I stopped enjoying herbs for a few years or whatever, I just quit, and felt fine. I love it too.
It's not potency or anything either, because I get toppest best quality here lmao
Guess we are all different. hope you find a way to refocus and stop giving weird feeling time of day.

Your fortune: ｷﾀ━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!

>>935787630
It's a do nothing democrat with 0 testosterone.

>>935787506
i was losing it at work, it was time. so i quit my awful job and now i'm quitting weed.
i have to get my shit together, i don't want to be a poor weed nigger anymore.

>There's nothing addictive in weed. WTF is wrong with you?
it creates a dependency which is basically the same thing.

>>935787630
Yes, there is.
Your stupid stoner shit some other stoner said to you isn't true.

>>935787250 (OP)
You'll cave...

>>935787250 (OP)
If you have trouble kicking weed you're a degenerate fucking retard lol

It's fun but it's not that fun, not doing it is easy

>>935787881
>Your stupid
>Your
Anon... I

>>935788043
i won't
i actually have weed in the closet, still in the bag, im extremely proud of myself for not diving into it. it's hard tho.

>>935788074
You are stupid stoner isn't the proper way of typing that you fucking retard.
It's your stupid stoner shit.
Not you are stupid stoner shit, faggot.
The possession is on your stupid stoner knowledge, not you dumbass.

>>935788449
hey that's a horse
what do you suppose he's doing in there?

>>935787250 (OP)
Replace it with something else to distract you. Not another substance, just get into something else. Gym or some form of exercise would be best, followed by some creative activity, but literally anything can work. Playing video games or movies or reading. Whatever

>>935788572
yeah, i try that, thing is i cannot get into games. i play for 30 mins then completely lose interest.
before i could smoke a bowl and play rimworld for 12 hours.
i know this will end tho. couple weeks tops i should be back to normal.

>>935788492
That's what I thoughtz retard.

>>935787250 (OP)
Did you step down?
It’s another way to try.

>>935787630
Psychological dependence is real, habitual action is real.
Escapism is real.

>>935788449
You're so angry and instead of reasoning or logic, you resort to name calling and projection.
I'm not even the anon you replied to originally. i just wanted to poke you.
It's like you're angry about your life, and try to make an enemy out of people who don't matter.
It's like you're trying to pin all your own failings and insecurities on a convenient scapegoat.
There are people actually going out of their way to make our lives worse, but you focus on weed users. It's almost comical.

>>935787250 (OP)
I smoked for 15 years straight like 4g a day, then about 6 months ago i had a strange surge of clairty while high, i quit smoking, weed, alcohol and started working out, studying engineering now and i do not miss it at all, you wont regret it, about 2 weeks in you will have a massive dopamine rush bordering a manic episode, but it passes, your brain ajusts and after that you regain your ability to think deeply, you become more driven and positive trust me. Keep at it, the worst part is the first week, your emotions will run wild, you will dream crazy shit but its all healthy its your brain waking back up.

>>935789873
It's the vagus nerve and your natural endocannabinoid system reprogramming itself.
But this anon is right.

Anyway here's a video of my cat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1Fp8OTlCYU

>>935790147
cute kot

>>935790633
Dubs checked.

Anyway here's a video of my cat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1Fp8OTlCYU

you are just getting started with the shittiness bro. you aren't going to get a full night's sleep or experience motivation for at least 2 months.

>>935787250 (OP)
This is a psy-op thread.

>>935788074
"Your stupid stoner shit"
>Your stupid
>Your
>Anon... I
Poor troll.

>>935787630

>>935787250 (OP)
>quitting weed
lolwut

>>935787250 (OP)
Huh I have a serious tobacco addiction but have quit pot for up to a year with out physical issues.

Wish you well.

>>935788492
>what do you suppose he's doing in there?
Just horsing around.

>>935787250 (OP)
>been smoking for 20 years
>take tolerance breaks every once in a while for about a month
I think you just have no willpower.

>>935793808
Now say the whole sentence.

"Your stupid stoner shit some other stoner said to you isn't true." Doesn't make sense without a period. I'm pretty sure the anon meant it as "you're stupid." "Stoner shit some other stoner said..."

I've smoked or vaped weed for over 10 years daily now. Usually only in evenings and only when I don't have any obligations. I mostly have my life together, but no children yet, so I've no real reason to quit, there is no problem. I am not motivated to try and quit because I don't think the consequences outweigh the way it makes me feel.

But I absolutely know for a fact that if I were to attempt to quit it would be quite difficult, require intent and focus on the goal and ongoing resilience to not lose progress.

Good luck OP, I hope you are successful in whatever you need to do.

>>935794137
>Doesn't make sense without a period.
Pivot. That wasn't even the original point ("wrong" your). >>935788074

>>935794296
That is the point. It would work with your stupid stoner shit, but not with the rest, it becomes a run-on sentence. It doesn't make sense any other way. "Your stupid stoner shit some other stoner said to you isnt true." Without separating the first two words doesn't make any sense.

I hear ya OP
I had an 8th last week and I smoked it all so fast and now it feels like, where the fuck did all my weed go???? It just disappeared??

>>935794549
You ever hear the phrase "up in smoke"?

Your fortune: Outlook good

>>935794137
He meant (I'm 95% certain; I would bet $100 and win 19/20 times [$1900]) "your (stupid) stoner shit" (possessive).
>>935794414
>"Your stupid stoner shit some other stoner said to you isnt true." Without separating the first two words doesn't make any sense.
No, he possesses "stoner shit" because a friend gave (told) it to him.

>>935794414
>your [beliefs] some other stoner [taught] you isn't true

>>935787250 (OP)
after 3 days you should be fine tho

>>935793808
>Still mad
>Still replying
Anion, red the other post. Sorry I upset you, but you need to get over it.
>>935794296
Calm your tits and learn to have fun for a change.

>>935794761

>>935794414
Also, he would have to use a "," not a "." if he meant "you're stupid(,) stoner shit".

>>935794941
>Still mad
>Still replying
Trust me, I don't get mad from grammar trolls.
>Calm your tits and learn to have fun for a change.
lol. Why are you pretending that I'm in conniptions right now? ;)

>>935795142
You seem mad. you seemed much angrier earlier.
>conniptions
Good word, but you were throwing a tantrum, if you're still the same poster from earlier. You seemed pissed.

>>935794983
You're stupid is a complete sentence. A single idea. A comma would be acceptable and so is a period, but the punctuation is not what's in dispute. Taking out irrelevant words gives us:
Your [stupid] shit some other person said isn't true

>>935795345
>You seem mad. you seemed much angrier earlier.
You seem kinda gay ;)))))

>conniptions
>Good word
Thank you, Word Noticer.
>if you're still the same poster from earlier. You seemed pissed.
I honestly don't know if I am (the same poster from earlier), but I'm NOT "pissed". XD

>>935793993

>ITT OP asks for quitting advice
>anons argue over your and you're for 90% of the thread
Never change, /b/

>>935795477
>>935795345
>good word
>thank you
Would you two just fuck already?

>>935795463
>A comma would be acceptable and so is a period
Yes, but a comma makes more sense (with regards to "stupid stoner shit" being stupid).
>but the punctuation is not what's in dispute.
I agree, but that was just a tangent. :)

>>935787250 (OP)
>>935787250 (OP)
You're addicted Broseph, cold turkey can work on occasion, but not always and the more addicted you are; the more you need to do a taper.

Week 1: Get a dugout and only literally do a couple hits when you must.

Week 2: Only do a couple hits from the dugout when you must and ONLY after work. Before work, or during work is now forbidden.

Week 3: Switching to edibles here is ideal. Switch to just doing an edible very late at night around when you intend to go to bed. I find somewhere from 10-25mg is the sweet spot.

Week 4: Same as week 3 but halve your dosage on the gummies.

Week 5 and on: You should be able to cleanly stop and break free.


In my old age, I'm such a pothead that I require a taper when I used to be able to just stop cold turkey for a bit.

Also, exercise and eat right.

>>935795639
Okay I see what you mean, youre seeing stupid as an adjective describing stoner shit, but I see it as an adjective describing you, thus the need for it to be "you are" with a period. You are stupid. Full stop. I just don't think it makes sense the other way, because it shouldn't be "your stupid, stoner shit some other stoner said" , it should be THE stupid, stoner shit blah blah blah. I still don't think "your" makes sense there if that is what they intended to say.

>>935795684
>exercise and eat right.
Whoa whoa whoa... one step at a time

>>935795768
>Okay I see what you mean, youre seeing stupid as an adjective describing stoner shit, but I see it as an adjective describing you
basically, yes.
>it shouldn't be "your stupid, stoner shit some other stoner said"
No, but I meant that based off of what you said (I think you said "You're") "you're, stupid stoner shit some other stoner said" (which is grammatically incorrect anyway) would make more sense.

>>935795477
Dubs, but you're projecting now lmao
Well, have a good nigh then. I just like fucking around sometimes. It's fun to press buttons, but sometimes it''s a bad habit.

>>935796012
I'm getting too high to continue this conversation lol. Cheers

Your fortune: Bad Luck

>>935796101
>Dubs, but you're projecting now lmao
What do you think "projecting" means??? --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection#Practical_examples
>It's fun to press buttons, but sometimes it''s a bad habit.
XD. Do you think you're an "evil master-mind" or something?

>>935796129
>I'm getting too high to continue this conversation lol. Cheers
XD. Goodbye.

>>935787250 (OP)
it goes away day 4 or so.
just drink soup, make tea and sink lots of hours into video games.
if you feel "tight" or stressed go for a walk around the block.

you'll know you're done with withdrawals when suddenly your appetite comes back and you want to destroy a mountain of food.

hardest part for me was filling in the random 10min parts of the day when you'd roll one up.
i ended up replacing weed with alcohol though so careful anon. dont use beer to deal with the weed withdrawals.

>>935787250 (OP)
Whiny little bitch. Weed is not even addictive.

>>935787630
People get in a mindset where
>I'm stressed, so I'll smoke up
>I'm tired, so I'll smoke up
>Its dinner time, I'll smoke up
>Its time to fap/play vidya, I'll smoke up
>Gotta go to bed, I'll smoke up

When you smoke weed all the time you have to go out of your way to not just sit at home and do nothing all the time.

Weed was always my drug of choice. It was also the 2nd to last addictive substance I quit, the last being alcohol.

Coke, ecstasy, pills? Quit 'em all at once and was just doing weed and alcohol. Sucked a bit, but I still had vices, so I was good.

Failed my first attempt at quitting weed and alcohol. Kept wanting to get high. Got FOMO about parties. Decided to just quit weed first.

Dude I had to fucking ween off of weed. I would give myself the restriction of "You can smoke as much as you want 5 days a week, but 2 days a week you have to go without" and gradually increased that until I was only smoking one day a week. Weed was fucking hard to quit. That was my escape, man. I used it to sleep. I used it to feel good about waking up. It was a constant in my life.

2 months later, quit alcohol cold turkey like all the other drugs lol.

>>935796426
>sit at home and do nothing all the time.
How THE FUCK do you have money on weed while sitting at home all day long?

>>935787250 (OP)
stop being so dramatic. I've smoked everyday for 15 and now I'm 26 weeks clean and its fine. It sounds like you don't want to to quit smoking so you are making it worse. The fucked up dreams will last for like 2 months, buckle up faggot

>>935796185
You said "you seem gay", and I said I think you're projecting thereby indicating you're engaging in wishful thinking.
Practically anyone would know what that means in context, anon.
The fact you are reacting this way, being passive aggressive tells me you are actually masking your own bitter anger.
>Do you think you're
No. I was saying I like to have a little fun messing with people for the sake of comedy. You interpret things badly. Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations. It makes me believe in the femcel meme honestly.

>>935796512
not him but where im at rn an ounce might be $30 on sale
normal prices for an ounce of higher grade are like $70 to $120
and that lasts a while

I think you're doing a good thing OP, cutting back weed was one of the best decisions I've made. I still smoke, literally one drag to get a bit giggly maybe once a week.

That being said I'm about to turn 35. Weed isn't the same as when I was young. It just makes me uncomfortable if I smoke too much so it made cutting back easy.

legal where im at too
so thats cool

>>935787250 (OP)
That's nonsense, you just gotta smoke more weed.

>>935796805
>You said "you seem gay", and I said I think you're projecting thereby indicating you're engaging in wishful thinking.
You literally didn't quote me saying "You seem gay", How am I supposed to know what someone is silently quoting?
>The fact you are reacting this way, being passive aggressive tells me you are actually masking your own bitter anger.
Is this post coming from an armchair? ;))))
>No. I was saying I like to have a little fun messing with people for the sake of comedy.
You said: "It's fun to press buttons, but sometimes it''s a bad habit.", which seems kinda "evil master-mind(ey)".
>Are you by any chance a woman?
That depends; Do you think women can have penises?

>>935787250 (OP)
grow some balls, it takes a week at most

the only true downside are the more vivid dreams, but even those will pass

>>935787250 (OP)
I've been smoking weed every day for 10 years and I'm mighty fine.

>>935797286
You seem kinda insufferable. Sorry.

The withdrawals won't kill you
unless you decide to bathtub-toaster

but that's irrelevant

>>935797775
Lmfao. No response (also he thinks I'm getting mad at him XD).

>>935797906
You are acting passive aggressive, and you're clearly driven to continue this out of spite.

>>935798302
>You are acting passive aggressive, and you're clearly driven to continue this out of spite.
If you don't want to talk, then I'm not stopping you from replying to others in this thread, other thread(s) or just lurking/leaving.

just fuck and get it out of your system already, jfc

>>935798634
Are you >>935795581 ?

>>935798720
no, i just got here

>>935798589
You keep replying with underhanded comments.

>>935798755
Who were you talking about, then?

>>935798884
how about you stop talking to me you annoying cunt?

>>935798840
>You keep replying with underhanded comments.
How??? please stop being so pathetic for no reason. -_-

>>935798908
this lmao

>>935798908
Lmfao. are you >>935798589 >>935798840 and samefagging?

>>935796129
Fuck dude. I came in too high and got worried about commas and periods and shit and then I remembered I was stoned and in a stoner thread.
Gonna go look at boobs or something.

>>935798976
Not >>935798589 I meant >>935798302

>>935798976
have your victim complexed checked out please

>>935798928
You act like a spiteful woman. You have no point, only anger under a flimsy passive aggressive mask. I tried making peace much earlier, but you've proven yourself to be unwilling to make peace.

>>935798976
no

>>935799022
Okay then (makes it even weirder). XDDD.

>>935787630
If it wasn't for weed he'd be addicted to cheeseburgers and lotto tickets.

>>935799017
That's not me. everyone hates you, though. Change.

>>935799058
>I tried making peace much earlier, but you've proven yourself to be unwilling to make peace.
FUCKING KEK LMAO

>>935799108
You have no point. I tried ending this on good terms, much earlier. You still acted like a spiteful woman despite this.

>>935799106
>That's not me. everyone hates you, though. Change
:((((
>You have no point. I tried ending this on good terms, much earlier. You still acted like a spiteful woman despite this.
Oh stop. You sound like a clingy girl half-assedly trying to beak up with her boyfriend.

>>935788421
It's important not to throw it all away and still have some available. In that case, you have some control, and it makes it easier to stop.

>>935799250
>no you
You can't argue worth a damn, you lie and you act out of spite. 3 hours later, and you're still upset, trying desperately to get the last word in, but there's nothing to say. So your struggle is meaningless.
You're going to be here awhile

gross

>>935787250 (OP)
Got it. Never stop. Good advice I think I'll take it.

>>935799434
>no you
When did I say anything semantically equivalent to "no u" in: >>935799250 ?
>You can't argue worth a damn
I'm not really trying to debate anything anymore (because nobody else is either).
>you lie and you act out of spite.
What do you mean by "lie"? When did I lie (and what about)?
>3 hours later, and you're still upset, trying desperately to get the last word in, but there's nothing to say. So your struggle is meaningless.
You're going to be here awhile
I'm not "upset"; You're clearly very angry: "your struggle is meaningless".

>>935799686
>You're going to be here awhile
*

>>935787250 (OP)
I use weed to regulate my adhd, I don't have a choice :(. My insurance is shitty, otherwise I'd just get adderall

>>935799715
Can't you micro-dose other amphetamines?

itt: spergs arguing over semantics (i guess this is 4chan..)

there are ways to cheat the system. it's possible to smoke weed without letting it affect you negatively, which sounds like the problem. learn moderation. engage with your local cannabis community, assuming you don't live in a restricted flyover state or BFE. get involved in activism. i've accomplished a lot in this regard.. the biggest learning being there are very accomplished people who smoke every day with no issue. the key is staying productive and contributing to a larger goal, whatever that may be. i'm on a 2 month tolerance break and almost all the negatives in this thread have impacted me extensively. bitterness, weird dreams, etc. etc.

the tolerance break is coming to a close and i will be smoking again soon, but i don't feel bad about it at all. for me, i was smoking a bit much so the importance of moderation was the thing that clarity of mind showed me. if there are people around you demonizing your usage, fuck them. it's a plant medicine as old as time. at the same time, if you can't smoke without being negatively affected, it's probably not for you.

>>935799753
I would if I had access to any of them

>>935799686
>no you sound like a girl!
It's in the implication.
> debate anything
it was never about debate, it was about your anger and attitude, and I think you may have wanted attention too.
You lie out of spite, as in your interpretations leading to your attempts at manipulation.
You're struggling to manipulate, and it shows.

>>935799847
Here you go buddy :^)

>>935799847
How often should I do tolerance breaks? I primarily use carts and edibles.

>>935799933
all i see is that fucked up jawline and your redundant file naming, kys

>>935800025
not him but if you don't know yourself well enough to say then you're missing something
you should be able o determine these things on your own, since you are (You)

>>935800068
Idek what that means lol!

>>935787250 (OP)
so smoking this shit long term is bad?

>>935800125
smoking it unmoderated is bad

>>935800025
i would say when you are no longer getting a perceived effect, or like others have stated doing other things without it feels impossible. i know it's cliche, but like others have also stated diet and exercise can really help here. long walks are a start.

once i start again i plan to limit usage to evenings, and overall drastically reduce how much i consume. prior to this break i was dabbing around 1g of concentrate a day. you got this! props for not digging into the closet stash. i have some nearby carts i could rip as well but it's not even tempting me at this point.

>>935799899
Oh, I specifically meant "half-assedly trying to beak up with her boyfriend" (in response to "I tried ending this on good terms, much earlier." from: >>935799154 ) , not JUST "you're a girl"
>it was never about debate, it was about your anger and attitude, and I think you may have wanted attention too.
No, I was definitely "debating" here: >>935796012 and here: >>935795639
>You lie out of spite, as in your interpretations leading to your attempts at manipulation.
Nope, I just genuinely thought "half-assedly trying to beak up with her boyfriend" was too much context to be read as: "you're a girl".

>>935800215
It's still a no you. You're saying the same basic thing back at me with an additional, weak implication.
It's clear you were upset coming in here.
>No, I was definitely
That wasn't me, though, so again you're acting in petty rage, lashing out at everyone, thinking we are all the same person.
>I just genuinely thought
It's not about that, and here again you're trying to twist the truth. It's about the fact you keep trying to lie about basically everything happening in this thread in order to give yourself an artificial advantage. in reality, it's obvious you're lying, and you have nothing of importance to say.

>>935800370
>It's still a no you. You're saying the same basic thing back at me with an additional, weak implication.
I probably can't change your opinion on that, but I genuinely do think "You still acted like a spiteful woman despite this." and "You sound like a clingy girl half-assedly trying to beak up with her boyfriend." are distinct (because you were saying: "I tried ending this on good terms, much earlier.")
>It's clear you were upset coming in here.
If you mean before entering the thread, then no; Do you think something happened to me???
>That wasn't me, though, so again you're acting in petty rage, lashing out at everyone, thinking we are all the same person.
I never said it was you (and never believed it was), if you mean just us talking and not the thread (as I had thought), even then I wasn't in a "rage" (XD).
>It's not about that, and here again you're trying to twist the truth. It's about the fact you keep trying to lie about basically everything happening in this thread in order to give yourself an artificial advantage. in reality, it's obvious you're lying, and you have nothing of importance to say.
You seem a little bit schizo, also I could say "you have nothing of importance to say." about most of the things you have said (to me).

>>935800668
You were trying to pin me as many things, and none of it sticks, because it's baseless.
Everything you do seems to be done out of spite and anger.
>Do you think something happened to me???
You entered a thread you don't like in order to get upset? Okay, you know what, that works too.
>I never said it was you
I mentioned it was never about debate in regards to this conversation, and you linked to your posts, in relationship to those words, implicating the conversation here and now is an extension of that very same argumentation.
You are wrong, and now you are trying to mask your mistake.
>I could say "you have nothing of importance to say
Another "no you" moment. It's all you have, and it's ineffective.
More name calling too. You're really proving my point more than anything. It's petty, you're lying and acting spiteful too.In that, you should change. It's your choice, but really man, if you act like this in real life, it might not end well for you.

>>935800918
>You were trying to pin me as many things, and none of it sticks, because it's baseless.
>Everything you do seems to be done out of spite and anger.
I only mixed you up for one person -_-
>You entered a thread you don't like in order to get upset? Okay, you know what, that works too.
I thought the thread was alright (I definitely didn't dislike it), but then I saw >>935788074 and responded...etc.
>I mentioned it was never about debate in regards to this conversation
I don't think you did (maybe I'm wrong, but ctrl + f doesn't show me anything)
>You are wrong, and now you are trying to mask your mistake.
Why wouldn't I just say "I was wrong about x"?
>Another "no you" moment. It's all you have, and it's ineffective.
Trust me, there's absolutely nothing wrong with "calling out" hypocrisy.
>More name calling too. You're really proving my point more than anything. It's petty, you're lying and acting spiteful too.In that, you should change. It's your choice, but really man, if you act like this in real life, it might not end well for you.
Yes, I said you were "a little bit schizo" (because of the massive speculation and armchair-psychology), but I don't see what me "name calling" proves. "it might not end well for you." is also too schizo(ey) and needlessly serious (this is a weed thread), and also signals that you hope some kind of harm comes to me (even though you say "It's your choice"), which is a little too "obsessed" I guess.

>>935801228
Well, mistakes happen, if you're being sincere, and I'm reading you correctly. You mistook me for another anon? Sure. Makes sense, I guess.
>but then I saw
I think you were yelling at more than a few Anons, but I'm not sure, and I'm not going to try and figure it out.
>I don't think you did
You forget fast too.That was few posts ago. >>935799899
I said: "it was never about debate," In response to You saying: "I'm not really trying to debate anything anymore"
That is why it was brought up. you're worrying me, for your own mental state.
As in, I feel as though you may be losing touch with reality. I hope not, because even though I think you were acting badly, you don't deserve to lose your mind.
>Why wouldn't I just say "I was wrong about x"?
You've been acting very manipulative, so...
>calling out" hypocrisy
Look at yourself. Call yourself out.
>armchair-psychology
>name calling
You implied this because I criticized you. Again, your responses have been spiteful and dishonest.
> don't see what me "name calling" proves
You're actin g petty and dishonest. You are almost certainly a woman too, because your typing, thought process and attitude all indicate that.
>wish you harm
>the other misinterpreted "play the victim" lines
I don't wish you harm. I was warning you acting like this in the rel world often causes violence. I don't know you, and you're probably on the other side of the world, but it's not about me. It;s about people reacting to your smug, condescending attempts at manipulations coupled with insults.
That *usually* leads people to turn towards violence, and so I am sincerely warning you about this fact in case you do not know any better.
>obsessed
>scizo
You're so very wrong. I hope once this thread is done with, you and I never speak again, until then, I will be here.

imagine samefagging this hard, fucking bots ruining 4chan worse than its users ever could

>>935801228
Also you don't know how to control + F if your search for the very conversation you are referencing in your earlier post cannot be found.
Either that, or the internet is glitching tf out for you too!

>>935801602
I genuinely thought it was two autists arguing

>>935801602
>y-yeah!
>t-they;re boots durr!
>i-i-i've never seen an argument here b4!
>im a newfag!
lol

>>935801602
>>935801623
We literally are XD.

>>935801577
>I think you were yelling at more than a few Anons, but I'm not sure, and I'm not going to try and figure it out.
I wasn't really yelling (besides, you can't yell through text with out THIS or !).
>You forget fast too.That was few posts ago. >>935799899
No, I definitely saw that one (I assumed you meant I was never trying to debate).
>I said: "it was never about debate," In response to You saying: "I'm not really trying to debate anything anymore"
Exactly! I had assumed you thought I never tried to "debate".
>As in, I feel as though you may be losing touch with reality. I hope not
I thought you were against "no u" in posts: ( >>935800370 "It's still a no you." and >>935800668
"You seem a little bit schizo":me).
>You've been acting very manipulative, so...
still can't demonstrate how.
>You're actin g petty and dishonest. You are almost certainly a woman too, because your typing, thought process and attitude all indicate that.
Why do you want me to be a woman? -_-
>I don't wish you harm. I was warning you acting like this in the rel world often causes violence.
I don't believe this (not that I'm scared because of /b/). -_-
>scizo
you misquoted me writing "schizo".
>You're so very wrong. I hope once this thread is done with, you and I never speak again, until then, I will be here.
Melodramatic again. XD

>>935787250 (OP)
the diamond in the rough (˘3˘)

>Work the 9 to 5, 5 days a week
>Good money
>Gym 6 days a week
>Smoke every night and weekend
>no gf and only a few friends that i play game with
Don't really feel like quitting but sometimes i feel i should

It took me a long time to learn that I cannot enjoy weed in moderation. Therefore I stopped using it entirely. Luckily I am not that way with alcohol so I can still unwind with a few beers occasionally without creating a habit

>>935802070
>I wasn't really yelling
You were in the sense I used the word.
>I assumed you meant I was never trying to debate
No you didn't. You're attempts at manipulation fail because they conflict with reality.
You're a horrible liar.
>v
You're very bad at reading, then. Conversing with you through text is impossible because you simultaneously try to play dumb and manipulate the truth.
You're not convincing me or anyone else.
>against "no u"
I am. That is what you are and were doing.
You mistake a sincere concern with an insult. I mean to say if you act like you have no sense of reality, insult and belittle people while lying to them, they will beat and/or do worse, because that's the way the world is outside the screen. That applies to virtually all people.
The fact you cannot tell sincerity from insult says a lot too.
You try to manipulate everything towards a falsehood.>still can't demonstrate how.
You tried to turn a concern I had for you into an insult.
>a woman
You act like a woman. If I want you to be anything it's sane, but that's not happening.
>not that I'm scared because of /b/
You're so illogical. No one should have let you on the internet lol. I meant what I said.
You're going to get you're in trouble if you act like a passive aggressive manipulator. People don't like it.
>misquoted
No. I mistyped. if you can't understand what those words connect to without a direct quote, you should try to remember what you typed.
>again. XD
I mean you're very insufferable as a person. Whoever you are, even if you're an adversarial algorithm, You're insufferable.
I doubt anyone would want to be anywhere near you.

>>935802513
i think a lot of people like you lack something
like wtf are you doing getting this blown out by herbs?
never seen this irl, and i've know a lot of people

>>935802514
>You were in the sense I used the word.
What sense?
>I assumed you meant I was never trying to debate
>No you didn't. You're attempts at manipulation fail because they conflict with reality.
>You're a horrible liar.
No, I definitely did mean that (I know what's in my head).
>v
>You're very bad at reading, then. Conversing with you through text is impossible because you simultaneously try to play dumb and manipulate the truth.
>You're not convincing me or anyone else.
I'm not sure what "v" was replying to. No, I think you just read into what I write a bit too much (remember when I asked "Is this post coming from an armchair?")
>against "no u"
>I am. That is what you are and were doing.
I don't believe so, see: --> >>935799250
>You mistake a sincere concern with an insult.
"I don't wish you harm. I was warning you acting like this in the rel world often causes violence." "if you act like this in real life, it might not end well for you."
>You act like a woman. If I want you to be anything it's sane, but that's not happening.
says the guy who said: "You were trying to pin me as many things, and none of it sticks, because it's baseless.
Everything you do seems to be done out of spite and anger."
>You're going to get you're in trouble if you act like a passive aggressive manipulator. People don't like it.
More schizo. -_-
>No. I mistyped.
Yes, I was just saying "scizo" makes me look worse. XD
>you're very insufferable as a person. Whoever you are, even if you're an adversarial algorithm, You're insufferable.
See what I mean by "schizo"?

>>935802893
The sense of the word meaning you were passive-aggressively insulting others, including myself, and making an argument over nothing.
It was the tone of your text.
>I know what's in my head
Somehow I doubt that.
>read into what I write a bit too much
No. I am judging your words and actions against your effort to manipulate them. I already gave examples, and if you want them, lurk the thread. It seems like you forget what happened past 5 minutes.
>I don't believe
You took what I said, added an extra part, then tried to pass it off as original. you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate and react. You're an awful person.
>says the guy who said
Those claims had reason behind them. You act like manipulative liar, and you twist the truth into convenient lies n order to mask your own intentions of deception.
I wanted to warn you, because I thought you might be ignorant of the world.
> schizo
You think a clear warning is a sign of schizophrenia?
I will say it again:
You're going to get you're in trouble if you act like a passive aggressive manipulator. People don't like it.
that's very true.
>"scizo" makes me look worse
No it doesn't. your mockery and lies make you look like a horrible person, though.
>See what I mean
No.
You really are new here. To the internet. There are many automated systems here posting online, and you could be one for the fact you don't really act right, or remember what you said a few posts ago.
You come off as something like an angry woman, or an adversarial bot.
Imagine not knowing about modern technology. Lurk moar. (yes moar)

>>935803394
>It was the tone of your text.
Okay.
>I know what's in my head
>Somehow I doubt that.
I guess you know more?
>I am judging your words and actions against your effort to manipulate them.
I don't try to "manipulate" any words, despite that being all you say.
>You took what I said, added an extra part, then tried to pass it off as original. you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate and react. You're an awful person.
Do you genuinely think that I plagiarised your insult? -_-
>Those claims had reason behind them. You act like manipulative liar, and you twist the truth into convenient lies n order to mask your own intentions of deception.
>I wanted to warn you, because I thought you might be ignorant of the world.
I don't want to repeat myself and call you a schizo another 3-5 times but you're making it hard.
>an angry woman, or an adversarial bot.
These two again, really?
>Lurk moar. (yes moar)
OMG "moar" and not "more" I never knew! -_-

OP here. wtf happened to my thread lol
i just slept 8 hours no dreams. weird, but good.
thanks for all the encouragement, i think today will be easier.

>>935803688 Doubles_88
>Okay.
Even this reads as passive aggressive when taken in consideration to your post here, and your other posts.
>I guess you know more
The tone and intention of your post, and your post history in this thread say a lot.
Reading is sufficient enough to understand what you're saying in the subtext.
>plagiarized your insult
You basically took what I said and tried to use it against me in almost the same way. It's a no u.
>I don't want to repeat myself
You're engaging in ad hominem fallacy. You're not addressing my comment, but trying to dodge it by attacking my character instead. It's petty and manipulative. It'd be cool if you weren't like this.
> really?
Yes.
>I never knew!
Lurk moar then, newfaggot :^D
You seem new, but idk. you're irritating, but you could have been here a long time.
It's the way you act, so forgive me if you have seniority.

>>935803888
XD. Follow the trail from: >>935788074

>>935803888
>888
>wat happen??? OJOJOJOJOJ!
this is /b/ fren
this thread was cooked before it was started lmao

>>935803911 Dubs
To >>935787881
You insulted that anon without reason.

>>935803911
you really are so petty anon

>>935803985
Oh, I'm not the guy I linked here: >>935803911

>>935804038
i know

today's word will be reciprocity!
you get what you give

>>935804065
good word

>>935804123
hot
kinda funny how big her bobbers are lmao

>>935804141
yesh i prefer smaller boobs but ss is toppest

>>935804232
yeah lol
i definitely see the appeal in both

>>935803903
>I guess you know more
>The tone and intention of your post, and your post history in this thread say a lot.
>Reading is sufficient enough to understand what you're saying in the subtext.
You said that I don't know what's in my own head.
>You basically took what I said and tried to use it against me in almost the same way. It's a no u.
No, I could have replaced "girl" and "boyfriend" with "boy" and "girlfriend" and there would have been no semantic change.
>You're engaging in ad hominem fallacy.
No, I'm not see: --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem#Abusive_ad_hominem excerpt: "An example is a dialogue at the court, where the attorney cross-examines an eyewitness, bringing to light the fact that the witness was convicted in the past for lying. If the attorney's conclusion is that the witness is lying, that would be wrong. But if his argument would be that the witness should not be trusted, that would not be a fallacy."
>trying to dodge it by attacking my character instead.
No, I never attacked your character in order to claim your argument was false, you were just saying "schizo" things, so I insulted you sometimes.
>You seem new, but idk. you're irritating, but you could have been here a long time.
>It's the way you act, so forgive me if you have seniority.
Do you want me to say "It's okay kouhai" or something?
>>935804051
:(((

>>935804274
>You said that I don't know what's in my own head.
I didn't. You're being manipulative, and passive aggressive, and engaging in fallacy.
>I could have replaced
It's about the way you took my criticism against you, and tried to forcibly apply it to me. it's unoriginal.
>No, I'm not
You are calling me "schizo" in order to dismiss what I said instead of engaging with my argument.
That is ad hominem fallacy. you don't understand the example given either. Here's a definition for you: Image related.
>marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
- - -
>No, I never
You called me something I am not, and never addressed my argument. Ad hominem. An attack on the person rather than the argument.
You'll probably get confused again, and not understand the words in the definition.
>Do you want me to say
You shouldn't be here.

>>935804472
>You said that I don't know what's in my own head.
>I didn't. You're being manipulative, and passive aggressive, and engaging in fallacy.
you literally said: "Somehow I doubt that.", in response to "I know what's in my head", you specifically said that here: >>935803394
>It's about the way you took my criticism against you, and tried to forcibly apply it to me. it's unoriginal.
You're ignoring my point that " I could have replaced "girl" and "boyfriend" with "boy" and "girlfriend" and there would have been no semantic change."
>You are calling me "schizo" in order to dismiss what I said instead of engaging with my argument.
>That is ad hominem fallacy. you don't understand the example given either. Here's a definition for you: Image related.
No, the "argumentum ad hominem" is specifically attacking the character over the arguments; Just because I called you a "schizo" doesn't mean I ignored your arguments.
>You shouldn't be here.
Black neighborhood much?

>>935802550
evidence suggests some people are more likely to get hooked on weed, due to genetics.

>>935804635
that's not a proclamation you do not know. that's a proclamation of doubt. A distinction with a difference.
>You're ignoring my point that
You took "female" and tried to stick it back on me in a cheap way out of spite.
>attacking the character over the arguments
You did ignore my argument, and incited said "schizo".
>doesn't mean I ignored your arguments
You did ignore them in favor of calling me baseless names, because you felt uncomfortable. You really act like a woman, and I'm not saying that as an insult.
>neighborhood
I mean on 4chan, or on the internet in general. You don't really seem to understand anything.

>>935804723
What evidence (citation, please.)?

>>935804723
evidence suggests?
i think it's a lack of life experience as boomer as that sounds
hear me out
people who have been challenged more in life have more control over themselves and so maybe quitting is easier for them
never met anyone i recall having trouble quitting weed
cigarettes and alcohol but not zaza

>>935804813
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3371269/

got this from

https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/01/05/marijuana-much-more-than-you-wanted-to-know/

everyone's different
but you make the choices
don't buy any and don't smoke any if offered
and you've stopped
it's always your choice no matter who you are
even if it's tougher or easier for you to stop

>>935804802
>that's not a proclamation you do not know. that's a proclamation of doubt. A distinction with a difference.
Yes, specifically a proclamation of doubt towards "I know what's in my head".
>You took "female" and tried to stick it back on me in a cheap way out of spite.
No, like I have said over three times now, I specifically meant clingy and breaking-up.
>You did ignore my argument, and incited said "schizo".
"ignored" the point is that I never said your argument was wrong because you're a schizo (I only used it as an insult).
>You did ignore them in favor of calling me baseless names, because you felt uncomfortable. You really act like a woman, and I'm not saying that as an insult.
You have self-admittedly used woman as an insult (it's what you were upset about me "plagiarising"), you did it here: "You basically took what I said and tried to use it against me in almost the same way. It's a no u." from: >>935803903 , and here: "You took what I said, added an extra part, then tried to pass it off as original. you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate and react. You're an awful person." from: >>935803394 .
>I mean on 4chan, or on the internet in general. You don't really seem to understand anything.
Okay. -_-

>>935805173
Saying I doubt is not saying 'I know".
>No
You claim that, but you weaseled that in right after I noticed your behavior. and posted. Thinking "this anon acts and thinks like a woman".
>used it as an insult
To dismiss me. Yes. You engaged in ad hominem fallacy. you never engaged with my argument.
>used woman as an insult
I used it as an observation, and said I am not using it as an insult several times now.
You're being deceitful again. You're not fooling anyone but yourself.
>you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate and react. You're an awful person.
Praise be. I agree with my past post. Well stated.
I still didn't use woman as an insult, but observed many women I have met act the same, and when a woman acts like that, it's a red flag. Manipulative, lying women should be avoided. you should be avoided.
>Okay
You act like you're too young to be here. you don't even seem to understand what I am saying half the times lol.
You seemed to have forgotten what happened minutes ago, but maybe you're just high on something. this is /b/b after all, and this is a drug thread. it's possible lmao

>>935804856
quitting heavy weed use might not be as dramatic as quitting alcohol, which can require hospitalization. but its no picnic either. dependence is real. why wouldnt it be? if you cease providing your brain with a chemical it has become habituated too, it will effect your brain.
tobacco cessation can also make people irritable and moody and feeling like they need to spark up.
its cool tho im resolved to quit. last time i did this i had horrific nightmares for weeks. so far nothing. losing sleep is the worst.

>>935787820

Just ask your Mommy for some weed money.

>>935805520
parents are dead many years
theres only me. i have to be responsible for myself, no one is gonna rescue me if i fail. i would sooner quit all drugs and eat plain white rice than be homeless.

>>935805519
i've enjoyed a fuckton
it was easy to put down for many years, easy to come back to, and easy to walk away from again
i think everyone's different but what youre telling me doesn't fit with my experiences either
>dependence is real
maybe for you but not for anyone i knew and not for myself
have to wonder why exactly, but hope you find your way anon

>>935805403
>Saying I doubt is not saying 'I know".
Okay, you "doubt" I know what's in my head, then?
>You claim that, but you weaseled that in right after I noticed your behavior. and posted. Thinking "this anon acts and thinks like a woman".
XD. I only pointed out my subtext afterwards because I had thought it too obvious to miss.
>used woman as an insult
>I used it as an observation, and said I am not using it as an insult several times now.
>You're being deceitful again. You're not fooling anyone but yourself.
". Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations. It makes me believe in the femcel meme honestly." "You act like a spiteful woman." "You still acted like a spiteful woman despite this." "but I genuinely do think "You still acted like a spiteful woman despite this.""
>>you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate and react. You're an awful person.
>Praise be. I agree with my past post. Well stated.
Yes, I specifically put that in quotations which you omitted (I couldn't put it in greentext, otherwise I would have had to dedicate entire paragraphs).
>Manipulative, lying women should be avoided. you should be avoided.
Okay. -_-
>but maybe you're just high on something. this is /b/b after all
Are you?

>>935805603
again i believe its genetic. it could be dosage too. i could easily smoke anywhere from 4 to 8 of those bowls in OP a day. a 1g vape cartridge might last two weeks if i was working, less if i wasnt. and it was every single day.

>>935805662
i think it's more than genetic, but whatever is happening your situation sounds exhausting
i think self control factors in a lot, because that's a thing me and most of my friends had in common
idk but hope it's easy going for you

>>935805598
You've been replying to everyone in this thread since yesterday afternoon.

Maybe if you went outside and tried having an actual life you wouldn't be fiending for weed.

>>935805629
I doubt you properly comprehend what's being said or typed, and if you do you're playing dumb all too well.
>it too obvious to miss
I don't mistake the actual subtext for your lie.
>Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations
This is true, and it's not an insult as much as it is an observation.
>You act like a spiteful woman
You were, You're acting tired now.
>omitted
I didn't omit anything. What are you saying? I didn't specifically reference a post ITT, so it's omitted? It's here for all to see. If anything, you failed to include it up until now.
I stand by those words. they were part of a very accurate observation.
>Okay.
Yep.
I hope you learn to treat others better. I try to be fair, but you demonstrated so many negative things to me, it's difficult not to be critical in this situation.
>Are you
You didn't answer, and instead asked the question in the subtext of my statement back at me. It's an "are u?" instead of a "no u.".
Comical.
I will take that as a possible yes, but it's okay either way. you seem *maybe* drunk.
I hope you have a good night, anon.
I hope you change and grow too.

>>935805820

This is a bot

>>935805831
No I'm not Anon. Fucking hell
Nigger Nigger Nigger, y'ur a fag :^)
Happy?
Lmao

>>935789872
I can't believe this shitty thread is still up
Holy fucking projection, you're certainly him. I said it's dumb stoner logic to think that shit isn't addictive, he then showed me his dumbass doesn't know the difference between your and you're.
Faggot

>>935805841
Nah. Yyou're just mad. you cam into the thread mad, and you're going to leave it mad.
That's on (You).

>>935805859
Nice job admitting you're samefagging it up and lying about it, retard.

>>935805920
Where's the samefagging? This should be good. Show me.

>>935805920
>saving the thumbnail
you want me to find you the full version?

>>935805820
>it too obvious to miss
>I don't mistake the actual subtext for your lie.
Sure. -___-
>Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. >Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations
>This is true, and it's not an insult as much as it is an observation.
>You act like a spiteful woman
>You were, You're acting tired now.
So, repeatedly using "woman" along with "spiteful" "irrational" and "femcel" isn't using woman to insult???
>I didn't omit anything. What are you saying? I didn't specifically reference a post ITT, so it's omitted? It's here for all to see. If anything, you failed to include it up until now.
>I stand by those words. they were part of a very accurate observation.
That's 100% not what i was even talking about; When I said "omitted" I mean you omitted quotation marks (specifically to make it look like I had accidentally not used green text), if you want to know why I already said that here: >>935805629 .
>You didn't answer, and instead asked the question in the subtext of my statement back at me. It's an "are u?" instead of a "no u.".
You weren't being serious, right? you were asking if i was high. XD
>I hope you change and grow too.
Yes, and definitely you too (oh no is this just "no u").

>>935805920
Unfortunately, no, see: >>935801742

>>935805979
>So, repeatedly using "woman" along with "spiteful" "irrational" and "femcel" isn't using woman to insult
I combined it with insults, but the fact you're a woman in and of itself isn't a bad thing, if you are.
>I mean you omitted quotation marks
That's not how anything works, and I was just quoting you. Period. You and I are the only ones chatting. How are quotation marks going to make or break the communication?
They won't.
They didn't.
> if you want to know why
Not really. is there anything left to say?
>you were asking if i was high
the implication is you may be intoxicated. The subtext indicated that, and so you *could have* derived a question from that statement.
>is this just "no u
A "no u" would be you taking an insult or implication, and turning it around on me without any real attempt at creativity.
>Yes, and definitely you too
This would be a gesture of kindness.

>>935806082
>I combined it with insults, but the fact you're a woman in and of itself isn't a bad thing, if you are.
XD. Stop with this "woman" stuff, also it isn't coincidental that every "woman" is preceded or followed by an insult.
>I was just quoting you. Period.
You removed the quotation marks (").
>you don't seem to think, but instead steal lie, manipulate >and react. You're an awful person.
>Praise be. I agree with my past post. Well stated.
On top of removing the quotation marks you said "Praise be. I agree with my past post. Well stated.", what did you mean by that? -_-
> if you want to know why
>Not really. is there anything left to say?
No, because I already showed you what I said here: >>935805979
>Yes, and definitely you too
This would be a gesture of kindness.
No, I specifically meant THAT in a negative way (I'm okay with changing for the better and you should too [real negative subtext this time]).

>>935806289
> it isn't coincidental that every "woman" is preceded or followed by an insult
It is a theme I was carrying on, but no. If you're a woman that part is fine. It's the irrational behavior I find fault with, and the lying, and fallacies.
>v
I never copy-pasted them. The words are the focus. Why do you need to see your own quotation marks you daft woman :^)
>what did you mean by that
Glad you asked! I meant to say: "you are not going to sway me against myself with my own words".
>I already showed you what I said here
I don't really care anymore. What's been said has been said, by each of us, so, I mean what's left to say?
>meant THAT in a negative way
Well, I was being sincere in saying I want you to change for the better.

I feel like I know you from somewhere by the way. If you've been on 4chan, we probably chatted sometime in the past too. If not, well, a lot of people type in similar ways. Leave a similar '''imprint'''.

>>935805841
this thread is better than 50pc of the catalog

>>935806289
>You removed the quotation marks
is the control +v error

>>935787250 (OP)
https://reddit.com/r/leaves

>>935787250 (OP)
get on ketamine for a while, itll help you and its easy to get off from, weed withdrawals are real and not nice
hope youll be better soon, anon,

>>935806559
go away elon nobody likes you

>>935806574
fucking fuckface elon, destroying my fav drugs face... ket is such a baby

>>935806619

>>935787250 (OP)
If reality wanted me to be sober then it'd try harder to suck less
It literally just makes reality better with no consequences for me
>18 years daily smoker

>>935806450
>It is a theme I was carrying on, but no. If you're a woman that part is fine. It's the irrational behavior I find fault with, and the lying, and fallacies.
I already showed you what the "ad hominem is" (bad character therefore bad argument).
>I never copy-pasted them. The words are the focus. Why do you need to see your own quotation marks you daft woman :^)
More insults followed by "woman", . It's about it looking like I didn't "greentext" the post (which is false) "I agree with my past post. Well stated.": >>935805629
>Glad you asked! I meant to say: "you are not going to sway me against myself with my own words".
Which seemed to imply I had accidentally not "greentexted" my quote of you.
>Well, I was being sincere in saying I want you to change for the better.
Me too, I want you (and I) to change for the better (we're both implying a change is needed).
>I feel like I know you from somewhere by the way. If you've been on 4chan, we probably chatted sometime in the past too. If not, well, a lot of people type in similar ways. Leave a similar '''imprint'''.
I don't specifically remember you, but maybe. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>935806715
>bad character therefore bad argument
That's not what it is, and when you used a baseless insult to dismiss my argument, you engaged in ad hominem.
I gave (You) the definition, remember?
You still don't know what those words mean to refer to. it;s obvious since you're not using them correctly.
>More insults
It was a joke. I even gave the :^)
>It's about it looking like I didn't "greentext
Too whom? what? We're the only ones chatting, bot :)
>Which seemed to imply I had accidentally not "greentexted" my quote of you.
Nope. It was a direct statement, and you and I both knew where it came from and what it referred to, so no problem.
>Me too,
You don't see or understand your own faults though, and you don't understand when people are joking, or being nice. Maybe that's just how you are, and so why should I expect you to change your nature?
>I don't specifically remember you,
People type in similar ways. I'm not sure, but yeah, familiar.

>>935806970
>That's not what it is, and when you used a baseless insult to dismiss my argument, you engaged in ad hominem.
No, I didn't use an insult (negative character evaluation) to dismiss your argument.
>I gave (You) the definition, remember?
>You still don't know what those words mean to refer to. it;s obvious since you're not using them correctly.
I also gave you the definition: >>935804274
>It was a joke. I even gave the :^)
"Why do you need to see your own quotation marks you daft woman :^)" is "daft" not an insult?
>It's about it looking like I didn't "greentext
>Too whom? what? We're the only ones chatting, bot :)
After you were accused as being a "bot" now you're accusing me. -_-
>Nope. It was a direct statement, and you and I both knew where it came from and what it referred to, so no problem.
I've had people lie to me about what I had Wrote/said, so this argument still doesn't work.
>You don't see or understand your own faults though, and you don't understand when people are joking, or being nice. Maybe that's just how you are, and so why should I expect you to change your nature?
You literally said: "Well, I was being sincere in saying I want you to change for the better." you DID expect me to change.
>People type in similar ways. I'm not sure, but yeah, familiar.
What was the other guy talking about?

>>935787250 (OP)
Its weed, its not difficult.
After a few months you'll feel better, maybe a year.

If you really want to fuck up, start taking tons of benzos, then try getting off of those

>>935807192
You did. you called me a schizo, and then ignored my argument.
>I also gave
You got confused or you were purposefully being deceitful, because you claim things which happened never happened.
>not an insult
A joke. not an insult. It's funny. I could add "women often don't understand humor" meme, and it would kinda fit.
>now you're accusing me
No, I even gave a sign I was joking again. Are you autistic anon?
You didn't answer the questions either.
>I've had people lie to me about what I had Wrote/said
You did that to me. You keep getting confused. I'm not trying to bring insult to you by asking, but do you have a mental condition?
The quantitation marks don't need to be there for this. In fact, you're the only one I've seen use quotation marks like that in a long time. its weird. I kinda started to try it out myself, but it's sloppy for chatting in my honest opinion.
>you DID expect me to change
You cannot grasp subtlety. I would like you to change for the better, but perhaps you cannot change sue to the nature of a condition you may have.
These are not mutually exclusive terms.

>>935807374
>You did. you called me a schizo, and then ignored my argument.
I responded with:"You seem a little bit schizo, also I could say "you have nothing of importance to say." about most of the things you have said (to me)." to: >>935800370 I directly responded to your claim.
>A joke. not an insult. It's funny. I could add "women often don't understand humor" meme, and it would kinda fit.
You do say: "I combined it with insults" in: >>935806082 , so doesn't it make sense for me to think that this is also an insult?
>No, I even gave a sign I was joking again.
You used ":^)" in: "Why do you need to see your own quotation marks you daft woman :^)", Can someone not use a "smiley" (or other emoticon) while insulting someone?
>You didn't answer the questions either.
which?
> I'm not trying to bring insult to you by asking, but do you have a mental condition?
More "I'm not insulting you", yeah right. -_-
>The quantitation marks don't need to be there for this. In fact, you're the only one I've seen use quotation marks like that in a long time. its weird. I kinda started to try it out myself, but it's sloppy for chatting in my honest opinion.
Quotation marks help clarify a lot of stuff.
>You cannot grasp subtlety. I would like you to change for the better, but perhaps you cannot change sue to the nature of a condition you may have.
These are not mutually exclusive terms.
So, you were hoping for the impossible???

>>935806559
lol i'm not taking horse tranquilizers. but i do feel better already. this is day 4. i've eating a grilled cheese sandwich.
still a little restless but i know i'm on the path to recovery. i don't even want to smoke that much.
>>935807232
>a year
lol no. i've done this before. it's a couple weeks to fully metabolize everything in my fat stores, few months for my body to fully reset.

>>935807792
You responded calling me schizo, and that's not the issue in total. you did it in order to dismiss my arguments. that is the issue. No the name, but how you used it, and what you failed to engage with.
>I directly responded to your claim
In order to dismiss it, and not really give an answer. You pretty much said, "I don't want to answer you", and left it at that.
>so doesn't it make sense for me to think that this is also an insult
Context should be able to tell you the difference.
>Can someone not use a "smiley" (or other emoticon) while insulting someone?
they could, but the way it was said, I mean I would have understood I was "takin the piss" so to speak. Other Anons would understand too, because I banter with them. you can't seem to understand.
>which?
In the post previous to this one. you keep avoiding 'inconvenient questions'.
>More
I really want to know it you're autistic, or not. I don't want to be mean to you or joke with you if you're more or less disabled.
>Quotation marks help clarify a lot of stuff
Maybe you need them, but most anons don't use them.
>So, you were hoping for the impossible???
I was hoping you had the ability to change, but I do not know. I would like you to, but you may be unable to due to a mental condition.
One more thing:
Sorry for the typos in the last post.

>>935806663
reality does kinda suck.
i doubt i'll quit for good but i am going to stop being a habitual user. buy a single cart at a time, finish it, wait a week or two before i buy another, that sort of thing.
i've never tried infrequent use, i wonder how that goes. i know smoking after a long break feels like entering heaven. i usually wind up jerking off it's so euphoric.

>>935787250 (OP)
after three days, your metabolism is mostly rebalanced from it, and it's about fighting psychology and boredom. You have to fill the time and use some other stress release

>>935808067
>You responded calling me schizo, and that's not the issue in total. you did it in order to dismiss my arguments. that is the issue. No the name, but how you used it, and what you failed to engage with.
>I directly responded to your claim
>In order to dismiss it, and not really give an answer. You pretty much said, "I don't want to answer you", and left it at that.
What do you want me to answer, then?
>Context should be able to tell you the difference.
So, 1/~>6 times I was supposed to divine a joke based on the fact it used an emoticon?
>they could, but the way it was said, I mean I would have understood I was "takin the piss" so to speak.
I could understand if this was with someone you hadn't previously insulted.
>In the post previous to this one. you keep avoiding 'inconvenient questions'.
No, I mean could you copy/paste them?
>I really want to know it you're autistic, or not. I don't want to be mean to you or joke with you if you're more or less disabled.
I'm not diagnosed with anything (if that's what your asking); Why would you care if a "misunderstanding" is due to a clinical "disability" or a non-clinical "lack or ability"?
>I was hoping you had the ability to change, but I do not know. I would like you to, but you may be unable to due to a mental condition.
So, you were just speculating?

>>935808419
>v
go back and find the questions you didn't answer, then answer them :^)
Could you imagine Lmao
I really don't care anon. I said as much earlier too.
>I was supposed to divine a joke based on the fact it used an emoticon?
Based on tone, arrangement and emoticon, yes. Emoticon alone, maybe, but no. It was the context of the post in total which would have or should have indicated a joke.
>I could understand if this was with someone you hadn't previously insulted.
Fair, but if the situation were reversed, I would have understood. Other anons and I are always insulting and laughing with one another. It's something specifically cultured. It's banter.
I could see how previous insults could have clouded your vision, though, but again, i would have understood, and other guaranteed would have understood too.
>could you copy/paste them
I know this isn't a joke, but I'm laughing a little.
If you cared to reply to them, you would have done so earlier.
>Why would you care if a "misunderstanding" is due to a clinical "disability" or a non-clinical "lack or ability"
One would be making fun of and teasing a disabled person who cannot help their condition and cannot grow out of it. the other would be mocking someone who could grow, and increase their "skills".
If you don't understand why, I worry.
>speculating?
You worry me alright.
I was offering faith that you may change, but not expecting change to occur unless you chose to change. Now, I am wondering other things.
I don't know why you can't understand, but it really make me wonder.

>>935808837
>go back and find the questions you didn't answer, then answer them :^)
Am I to take this as a a joke too (:^)), I'm not going to wade through posts I already responded too, besides I'm >95% sure I replied to everything that wasn't a joke.
>Could you imagine Lmao
I really don't care anon. I said as much earlier too.
Oh, okay then.
>Based on tone, arrangement and emoticon, yes. Emoticon alone, maybe, but no. It was the context of the post in total which would have or should have indicated a joke.
I don't know how else to rephrase this, I'll guess I didn't understand, then.
>i would have understood, and other guaranteed would have understood too.
Maybe, I don't know.
>If you cared to reply to them, you would have done so earlier.
I (at least) thought I did reply (still think so, but maybe I didn't).
>the other would be mocking someone who could grow, and increase their "skills".
Disabled people (especially stroke survivors) can absolutely change and make progress (even if it's genetic/neurological).
>You worry me alright.
>I was offering faith that you may change, but not expecting change to occur unless you chose to change. Now, I am wondering other things.
>I don't know why you can't understand, but it really make me wonder.
You said "I was hoping you had the ability to change, but I do not know." which sounds (to me) like speculation.

>>935809356
>I really don't care anon. I said as much earlier too.
*

>>935809356
You just have a little faith and will power to overcome this addiction

>>935809482
I can't, I'm "ye' of little faith".

>>935809356
>Am I to take this as a a joke too
100% Yes.
>Oh, okay then.
Yeah, its fine. I mean, it's not, but, it's past now.
>I don't know how else to rephrase this, I'll guess I didn't understand, then.
Well, it is what it is.
>I (at least) thought I did reply
Nah, but it's okay now.
>an absolutely change and make progress
You missed the point. Someone who cannot change and is permanently disabled shouldn't be mocked. they cannot help it. Someone who is only ignorant *should* be mocked, to help them progress.
>You said "I was hoping you had the ability to change, but I do not know."
It was 'wellwishing'. I wish you well, but understand if you are unable to change.

>>935809777
>You missed the point. Someone who cannot change and is permanently disabled shouldn't be mocked. they cannot help it. Someone who is only ignorant *should* be mocked, to help them progress.
Yes, people who are permanently disabled cannot change, but there are way more effective ways to get people to change (especially for non-con-formative personalities).
>It was 'wellwishing'. I wish you well, but understand if you are unable to change.
Okay.

>>935810137
>there are way more effective ways to get people to change
The truth should be enough, but, if that is so illusive it cannot be perceived, then forget it until you're ready.
>Okay.
I hope you live a happy life, even if you don't change.

>>935810137
I mean to say, change will come when and if it's ready to.

>>935810225
>The truth should be enough, but, if that is so illusive it cannot be perceived, then forget it until you're ready.
What idealistically "should" is not necessarily what "is" effective (for a lot of people).
>I hope you live a happy life, even if you don't change.
Sure, I don't wish you an unhappy life.

if u want to quit don't go cold turkey, just start smoking the lowest quality internet shit you can find. it will make you want to quit asap. the vivid dreams suck at first but then you start to like them, makes you feel energized when you wake up. you will suddenly have way more energy and feel beter. if you give a shit about your teeth at all you will notice your gums look better when you stop too. good luck retards

>>935810443
Ideally, everyone would be psychic to some degree and in touch with common sense.
This must be your choice.

>>935787250 (OP)
Realize that weed is not chemically addicting, your dependency is psychosomatic. So chill out.
You'll smoke again, it will be a problem again, you'll have to quit again. There are much worse drugs to quit so suppose yourself lucky.

>>935788421
Time to make good habits.
When you find yourself automatically walking to it, laugh and do something else.
It is just a pesky thought pattern trying to get the better of you. A little troublemaker.

>>935811079
>psychosomatic
thats the word i wanted earlier
yeah this

>>935811201
Do you know how to meditate? Do you know your self? These are helpful for winning over intrusive thoughts.

>>935811299 dubs
im not the op anon. no problem here. thanks for the word though. perfect.

>>935810689
>Ideally, everyone would be psychic to some degree and in touch with common sense.
This must be your choice.
My choice to not have common sense, or to be psychic?

>>935811963
What you pursue must be your choice.

>>935811963
To clarify further, what you do in your life must be your choice. This has nothing to do with the ideals I referred to.

>>935812540
Oh, okay.

>>935803888
Nice trips.... checked.

>>935811382
No problem.

>>935787250 (OP)

If you want to stay off the weed, do something hard. Learn advanced math, learn to program and start a project, buy a parts kit for some kind of machine and build it.

When you find yourself motivated to accomplish something difficult, you'll realize that being intoxicated becomes a barrier to accomplish those things, and you'll rather do that thing than the drugs.

I quit drinking when I got my first 3D printer. It wasn't one of those quick and easy slap it together units like the Ender 3 or those fancy new Bambu systems, this was a no-name parts kit from BangGood back in 2017. Just a straight up box full of loose nuts, bolts, acrylic plates and extruded aluminum. When you're trying to assemble, square and calibrate something that rough you realize quickly that its WAY easier to do while sober.

>>935787250 (OP)
Sounds like you have PTSD and the weed was treating that. Very common to mistake untreated PTSD for "withdrawal symptoms" because all the drug war propaganda claims those are withdrawal symptoms. Have you witnessed death or violence, or been around violent and unpredictable people in general? Maybe as a child?

>>935787250 (OP)
>want to die
I stopped smoking weed for multiple times for months and even yrs. Never had the slighest withdrawl symptoms other than a strong urge the first few days at my usual times but that went away. never had any physical symptoms.

Oh boy, I have missed old school /b/ stoner threads.

Was a daily stoner for pretty much 7-8 years. From high school into my young adult life. One day I got my hands on some dabs, took a fat rip, and got so high I lost my mind. I swear to god I was having a full on psychedelic experience. I remember I was able to see through my hands like past my skin and see my tendons and veins. I was so high and scared that I called my mom and she basically dogged me. Saying to sit back and call her again in an hour to see how I’m doing. Well an hour later I was back to normal and felt horrible. That made me take a break from weed that ended up being like 3 years. Nowadays I have a pen and hit it here and there.

>>935787630
Weed frees your mind for a bit and that is enough for a depressed person to develop addiction even indirectly.

>>935814365
these were so common 10 years ago.

>>935787250 (OP)
>Bpd

>>935814120
>physical withdrawal symptoms
Better sleep, better bloodflow, vivid dreams, better body temp regulation, better teeth/gum color and health. Otherwise yes, absolutely no side effects from quitting weed

Change lifestyle to minimize the desire to get high. The physical symptoms can suck like you said, I was angry af for 3 weeks and had cravings for 1.5 months after cold turkey. But if you don't change your mindset for using drugs even after quitting then you're not going to have a strong natural reason to stay off of it long term.

A lot of people can just quit it easy but they can't give tips for ppl like us nor believe in addiction. I quit meth relatively easily but I don't go into tweaker forums telling them to they're pussies