>>935894812 (OP)
Because their dumb.

>>935894812 (OP)
Because they're low-IQ cucks.

>>935894812 (OP)
Conservatives only care about billionaires and Jews ( really- the same thing )
Liberals only care about minorities and foreigners. Almost like they're both retarded.

>>935894812 (OP)
As democrats push for illegal immigration which provides slave labor for the billionaires.
M.I.M.S.

>>935894812 (OP)
>yfw democrats have had more billionaire donors and more money overall since 2018 including 90% donation dominance in tech
>yfw democrats are overrepresented by both the very rich and the very poor, while republican voters are the lower middle to middle class
Keep up this shill angle, it'll help you lose in 28 too.

>>935894812 (OP)
they all think they'll be billionaires one day.

>>935894812 (OP)
Were you at the Walton's protest on the weekend you fucking Jew piece of shit?

>>935895434
https://www.nokings.org/partners

funny, dont see wallyworld on there

>>935895293
you literally voted for a billionaire

who brought in the worlds richest man to do his dirty work

>>935894812 (OP)
ironic, actually

The real problem with divisions of species isn't that they are just guidelines, but that nobody can agree on the rules. Evolutionary biologists have proposed almost 30 different species definitions (called "species concepts") over the years, and none of them apply to all organisms. For example, the "no fertile offspring" definition is a paraphrase of one of the most popular species concepts called the Biological Species Concept (BSC), which actually states that a species is "a population or group of populations reproductively isolated from other such groups". "Reproductively isolated" in this case can mean "no fertile offspring", but it can also mean "they never encounter each other" or "they don't see each other as potential mates". The problems with the BSC are: 1. it doesn't work for organisms that reproduce asexually, 2. lots of organisms we would otherwise call different species have hybrids from time to time, and 3. reproductive isolation is actually really difficult to test (many organisms will hybridize in captivity but almost never in nature). As I said, there's like 30 more definitions of species that have been proposed, and most of them are slight modifications of other species concepts to fix problems with them (and introducing new problems lol). Some researchers have tried to come up with a definition that unifies all these different definitions (e.g. "a species is an independently-evolving metapopulation lineage"), but unified definitions fall apart because they're almost impossible to apply in the real world (how do you determine if something is "independently-evolving" or part of a metapopulation?).

>>935894904
>>935894961
>>935895018
Cope, brown ppl are 80 IQ and poor

>>935895434
Trump stands with Israel.
Methinks that you are the real Jew.

>>935896183
Trump wishes he was brown.

>>935896289
can you provide citation for that?

>>935896183

>>935895578
You literally had a candidate hand selected by billionaires who in the 2024 election denied you a primary vote, twice.

You're not very good at this.

I don't even know why this is up for debate, though it's probably just another issue used to create division and waste the time of peasants.
Males are males and females are females, two distinct creatures with biological differences. I think most reasonable/rational people know this
though for those who believe otherwise i ask: at what point does a biological man, in your mind, become a woman? Does putting on a wig, or having long hair make a man a woman? Of course not, we cannot classify anybody with long hair as a woman for there are many men who consider themselves as such who have long hair. Is it the combination of having long hair and wearing make-up? Again, this cannot be true, makeup is used for a variety of purposes that have nothing to do with gender. Is it the combination of having long hair, wearing make-up and wearing a specific style of clothing? IS it speaking a certain way, liking a certain thing, or subscribing to a specific belief? Is a woman merely a costume that anyone, in wearing, can become? No. If i strap a shell to my back and crawl around on all fours, does that make me a tortoise? Or if i strap a horn to my forehead and gallop, am I an unicorn? NO, just a dickhead.
Such a retarded topic

>>935894812 (OP)
When they pay as much as I do in fucking taxes then perhaps ill think about them..

>>935894812 (OP)
Because their string pullers have brainwashed them into bending over backwards to do everything they can to make poor billionaires lives easier, even if that means ruining their own lives in the process of making billionaires lives easier. They keep them distracted from this fact, by giving them Boogeymen, to focus all their hatred on. >>935896183 for example. That's a fully indoctrinated cultist right there. Watch, I bet I'll never be a woman

>>935894904
>their
...your stupidity actually makes me depressed

>>935894812 (OP)
you misspelled oligarchs ivan.

>>935894812 (OP)
Hey! Those billionaires need their fifth yacht a lot more than the common working man needs to eat!

Kill all poor people! I'm poor so kill me too!

>>935901365
Yeah, let's vote for people who actively hate us, and want nothing but to make our lives worse!

>>935901633
Let's make sure we alienate the working class too! Especially the people, I'm sorry I mean wage cucks, who take care of our highways, and utilities. Our God king emperor Trump will use his money to pay our critical infrastructure to take care of itself with no human intervention! We don't need a working class, they're all just dirty poor people!

Yeah, the name of the game is just counting calories. You just need to have your limit, count everything you eat, and make sure the day's total is at or below that limit. Soup is typically very low calorie, it's literally eating meat and veggies plus meat flavored juice that usually cups at like 35cal a CUP. You'll want to make sure you're staying full as reasonably possible, but also it's advised to never force feed yourself. Below your calories limit and not hungry? Cool. Extra deficit that day. It's [meal time] and you aren't hungry? Don't eat. Shrimple. Also, avoid liquid calirie like milk, juice, soda, and various flavored drinks. Always ready the label, before you drink enough calories for a large meal and now you can't eat any more for the day. Unsure about eating something? Log it as if you did eat it and see how you feel. If you can really live with that then sure eat it, if not then don't eat it. You will have to be hungry at some points and just accept it. Just be hungry and not eat. Stay strong and wait until you can eat. Different meal times and meal numbers may vary, really it what works for you. One meal a day (OMAD) usually very popular, most agree dinner is best so you aren't trying to sleep hungry. Others may prefer to eat all their calories at breakfast, others just graze all day on low calorie foods. Be realistic about your goals. Don't push TOO hard (1,000cal deficit) but don't be a bitch and just just do a teeny itsy bitsy deficit that will have you lose a pound a month. DO NOT IMCLUDE EXERCISE CALORIES. You can count them, but don't say "hurr I ate 2,000cal and burned off 1,000cal so I can eat another 1,000" first off you in all likelihood did not burn that many calories. Secondly, you can't buy calories back. It's bad practice and you will not lose weight, at least as much weight.

>>935894812 (OP)
Because they think what the TV (see: billionaires owning all the news networks) tells them to think.

Questioning shit means spending time *thinking* about things on one's own. Scary stuff.

>>935894904
>Their
I bet a nigger typed this.

>>935894904
>Because their dumb.
This about sums up the lefts case.

>>935894812 (OP)
Dems are the ones trying to make sure the billionaires don't lose their slave labor force don't get deported. Meanwhile the Cons are just controlled opposition.

>>935896103
>>935898249
>>935903377
What the hell *is* this shit??

>>935894812 (OP)
>we need to confiscate all the money from billionaires
>umm that's not really a good idea for society...
>WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING BILLIONAIRES??!?!?

>>935902386
Exactly! God king will take care of everything, all by himself, because he is, well, a God! As long as we're triggering the libs, we're winning in every metric imaginable!

Yeah, the ‘Won’t somebody think of the billionaires?’ meme is cute until you realize it’s the Democrat-run states like California where billions earmarked for the homeless somehow disappear into 'nonprofits' run by politician buddies, with no results except rising tents and real estate portfolios.

>>935904170
I can't wait for Daddy Trump to declare martial law in LA. I hope he makes the soldiers rape and kill all of the women and children, not necessarily in that order. I hope he has them torture everyone and not just the rioters.

That'll show the libs who's boss! Death to America! Long live Trump!

>>935904646
What's scary is how the left projects everything they would do.

>>935894812 (OP)
Billionaires create. They build businesses, employee people, add value to the world, challenge us all to do better and reach for the stars. And you? You sit in your mom's basement all day jerking off. Contributing nothing and whining about everything. So yeah, Im siding with the billionaires because I like winners.

>>935894812 (OP)
Lots of conservatives are only conservative about social issues. I don’t care about low taxes for corporations but I hate the lgbt and blm.

>>935904676
Are you calling God King Trumps great plans for -his- country liberal? I hope he deports you to a Somalian death camp to get raped by niggers until death.

>>935904676
See
>>935905000
How dare to tarnish Gods plan for Trump nation "liberal". You are going straight into the camps for such a disgusting accusation!

>>935905000
That's because conservatives are brain dead and the elites can use them to control the population.