Sneaky insecure hackers are the most annoying people to be friends with because they spy on you. You can catch them spying on you with a simple baited trap. Say something awful about them in a group they have no social connection to and magically, within a day or perhaps two, they lead you to the topic in a conversation, very blatantly if you are used to the behavior (if they even attempt tact instead of confronting you directly). However, they all stick to what they think is opsec like honey sticks in a beehive and will not admit that you caught them spying on you, like you already knew they were doing anyways. Instead focusing on whichever thing you said that they shouldn't know about.
Anyone else know what I mean?

Also, hello friend. I deserve an apology at least.

>>936033328 (OP)
Btw, it's usually female hackers who take this sort of bait. Male hackers typically are triggered by sympathy. This might surprise some of you.

iflb, nob, jd, ci, ehr, cil, etc, I'd forgive all of you if you just apologized.
It's your cowardice that insults me, like I wouldn't forgive you or something.

>>936033328 (OP)
I've done this shit intentionally with one friend, it's pretty funny mentioning something he was talking about like a month ago in a server I'm not on/not meant to be on and gaslight him into thinking he had mentioned it before

Also hacker is definitely the wrong term, in a purely technical sense it is indeed correct as hacking is effectively a catch-all for any sort of unintended use of something, but I don't think most view the term as anything beyond 'accessing the mainframe' type of shit.
Nor is it difficult to do, people leave traces everywhere and following them is easy even without tools. Don't share the same username on multiple platforms you don't want associated is the most major point you'll see broken but beyond that you should try to keep as much separate as possible. The best way to keep yourself safe is to know how it's done; do some searches for old usernames you use and you'll probably find things you've long forgotten about and probably don't want around for anyone to find whether that's personal information and/or links to usernames on separate platforms.

Your insecure friends' spying may be a problem for you but opsec is a very important topic and should not be laughed at. What you've done is leave a shiny thing and a known kleptomaniac in the same room unsupervised. If you don't want to be stalked, either get different friends who aren't weirdo stalkers or fix your online presence to not be immediately traceable across multiple services.

>>936033328 (OP)
Yea I just laugh at them because they lost a friend and will lose more trustworthy friends and only become friends with other dicks while having enemies for life

>>936033328 (OP)
What if schizophrenia from either people involved?

>>936034415
First of all, you really misinterpret the kind of person I am. I do think that's funny but only if you let them know. Because after years and years, gaslighting of any kind will literally ruin your "friend" if they are made of weaker stuff than I am. Secondly, I do not use the same username everywhere when I am testing them, the most obvious one is here, where I am overtly anonymous. Other times I do use the same name because I am deliberately baiting them.
Finally, your analogy makes it obvious how selfish you are as a person. I didn't leave shiny things in a room with a kleptomaniac from my perspective, I have left shiny things in rooms with myself, myself and myself, by invitation only (which I graciously accepted from myself). So explain that.

>>936034628
I want to help them move passed this childish behavior because they are my friends. Some of them I have known for over a decade. I don't think it's funny anymore, it's sad.

>>936034899
>Secondly, I do not use the same username everywhere when I am testing them, the most obvious one is here, where I am overtly anonymous
The whole sharing the same username bit is more so just the obvious way, tracing from username to username through minor links you've made and not noticed like services that expose what email you signed up under, unique profile pictures, unique files/filenames, etc. I never assumed you were stupid enough to not understand how they keep finding you when you use the username 'dickfucker69' on every website you visit
>Finally, your analogy makes it obvious how selfish you are as a person. I didn't leave shiny things in a room with a kleptomaniac from my perspective, I have left shiny things in rooms with myself, myself and myself, by invitation only (which I graciously accepted from myself). So explain that.
This is definitely a matter of perspective, while you may not believe it it is my belief and clearly the belief of your friends that if I could find it and I didn't have to install a RAT on your pc, it's fair game. Information on the internet is free to access and should stay such, so people should take the precautions that implies and be as careful as they can with their online presence if they don't want them associated.
I'm in no way defending the behavior nor am I saying it's fair to you or anyone else who gets caught out like that, but if you know how they're doing it and just letting it happen I don't see how the kleptomaniac analogy is wrong.

>>936034939
I'm going to expand on what I mean by childish since they're going to see this thread and probably misinterpret what I intend.
Some of you are 40. FOUR-TY. That is almost half a century. The rest of you are nearing 30 or into your 30s and you still can not control your behavior. The best you do is cut contact, and judging from the stories which reach me about you, you don't stop the behavior.
This is no longer a new thing nobody suspects, you are getting caught over and over because you can't help yourselves. The truth can set you free, you should not be afraid of it.

>>936035713
How long do you think I have been on the internet?

Eventually, a more malicious person will catch them, won't be open for a conversation, and instead just kill or traffick them.

imagine being a poser thinking you are a legit stalker hacker only a fucktard loser would fantasize about.

>>936036507
Are you half-literate? Or high?

>>936033328 (OP)
There are invisible tethers linking us together. Some call it "organic internet".
it's basically telepathy, and you give off the vibrations they later interpret, or interpret in the moment.
That's it, most of the time, believe it or not.
People could in theory be spying on you, but most of the time they just sense it. Your malice or your guilt. Get Good Fren. Get right with yourself, and stop talking behind people's backs.

>>936036666
Look, obviously, nice digits. Very cool, Anon.
I only talk behind their backs when they fail at opsec and I realize what they're doing. It's called bait.
Also, I'd be suspicious of whoever convinced you of that. Really, it's a very naive thing to just believe and take for granted.

>>936036206
I'd presume quite a while if you're friends with people you know as 40, and given you've stated 'stick[ing to] opsec like honey sticks in a beehive' I'd have to assume you're on the older side, no younger than 30 yourself minimum I'd guess.
Age doesn't change the fact that your information is out there, which you know about, and haven't done anything about, and are complaining people you know are weirdos who dox people are doxxing you.
Confront them directly and/or fix the problem yourself. If they're friends worth anything at all a simple 'stop doing that weird shit' with some proof would end most of it, and if it doesn't you should reconsider if you should associate with these people at all.
You wont stop these people from looking unless you do something about that yourself though, hence why I made the kleptomaniac comparison. The activity in itself is a fun exercise, even if it amounts to nothing more than very precise and persistent googling. The only course of action outside of trusting these people you clearly do not trust is to remove those links yourself between things you truly do not under any circumstance want linked.

>>936033328 (OP)
>loser creates fake account to get invited to social media group they were excluded from
>Hacker.jpg
>everyone is making fun of them
>cries about it on 4chan

Haha classic.

>>936037220
You keep focusing on the shit I don't care about. I know my information is out there, I don't hide it.
My age doesn't inform you of how long I've been on the internet either, just so you know I have been on since the 90s. I don't want to stop them from spying on me if that is their prerogative, I owe their spying on me for a lot if we're being frank about it. It is the disrespect that bothers me, like I won't notice. I've confronted them directly and they gaslight me, I assume to maintain opsec. I can't imagine it feels good to do that to a friend though.

>>936037463
Your reading comprehension is embarrassing. But your inability to put syllogism together might save you from future temptations. I give you 50:50 on NGMI.

>>936036918
>only talk behind their backs when they fail at opsec and I realize what they're doing.
So you imagine them to be bad guys depending how you feel about them, then behind their backs you accuse them of things they may have never done in order to provoke a further response from which you interpret another negative presupposition in order to validate your persecution of them?
You're the root of the problem.
Observation bias and delusion. That is what I am reading from you. I don't mean that as an insult, but it's my honest opinion all the same.
>convinced you of that
Of what? I am drawing from experience, anon.
If you believe every friend is a foe, (You) are the issue. You convince yourself to hate. I don't know what's driving this, but I recommend you change it, if you want to continue being friends with anyone.
>digits
Didn't even notice. Thanks, but, I hope you learn to see your own role in your misery too.

>>936037887
No, I don't accuse them of things. I'm more subtle, I drop a line like "I know someone into that" (usually not true), then connect it with other information which infers who I am talking about among the people who spy on me. I don't say names when I do this but the usual suspect will contact me.

You misinterpret what I'm like, I don't hate these people or fear them. If I were to analyze them narratively in my life they're being like annoying little brothers. Hardly enemies.

It's the telepathy that I'm referring to as naive. My interpretation is much more likely in this scenario. What you're talking about, I think, is more like an interpretation of social media algorithms (which are fed your data) leading you into the same spaces as people with the similar interests, lifestyles or whatever connects you according to that algorithm. You're describing how you engage with it more than how I have described how I engage with it.

>>936037528
I'm focusing on what you don't care about because what you do feels like there's simply no other solution than to confront them with overwhelming proof and pull an ultimatum on them or cut contact entirely.
They seem like particularly weird people, more so than the usual find every scrap of information I can on this person sort at least from what you've said. I don't understand why they would intentionally steer conversations towards events they know for a fact they shouldn't know about and then refuse knowledge of it when proven wrong, that feels like a dangerously stupid game if you refuse to come clean after like they are.

Again, if they so casually disrespect you so and have the pride(?) to refuse they've been caught out then they don't sound like the best people to be friends with. Even if you know every word someone's spoken it's not hard to just not bring it up. If they've been around 30 years and up and haven't changed I doubt they'll change any time soon either.

>>936037887
Also, I am very aware of my role in this too. Why do you think I want to unravel it so badly? Hahaha. I BURN with curiosity and a desire to assuage their fears about me! I'm a nobody that just wants to engage with whatever comes into my life. Like providence, you know? They misinterpret what I say so often, like you are doing, and I think it keeps us from having better conversations.

>>936038276
you're being weird and manipulative all the same, or it reads that way. Your life. have fun, or change it to make it even better.
>It's the telepathy that I'm referring to
I hope you gain more real-life experience. You'll see what I mean if you do, as strange and unbelievable as that may sound to you.
>leading you into the same spaces as people with the similar interests
That's how life works at all levels. The mechanisms may change, but it all flows like water, and reacts like sympathetic harmony.
>You're describing how you engage with it
No. I am offering a generalization.
We are going to have to agree to disagree.
Good luck finding peace from this or whatever, but you keep feeding into it, fixated on "it", whatever "it" actually is.
God help you anon.

>>936038492
>They misinterpret what I say so often
That isn't your problem though. No. Even though you're the one acting like a paranoid jerk, no.
> like you are doing
You're not being clear, and you're acting passive-aggressive.
>and I think it keeps us from having better conversations
Change yourself, then, and your approach Etc.

Annoying little energy vampire.
Mosquito personality.
That's my judgement here, even if it turns out to be wrong.

>>936038376
>They seem like particularly weird people
This is WHY we got along in the first place!
>why they would intentionally steer conversations towards events they know for a fact they shouldn't know about
They steer conversations like that because they're curious like I am, I know them well, so I know how to bait them.
>and then refuse knowledge of it when proven wrong
This, I only have guesses for. Which I have shared. Opsec is only the most logical answer I have thought of. Another possibility is that someone else informed them, and if THAT is the case I REALLY want to know who lol, wouldn't you?
>they don't sound like the best people to be friends with
They aren't, nobody is the best people to be friends with. I've tried being selective with friend groups, it just feels forced and fake. Imo, it is much better to have a history with the people I consider my friends. And if they betray me in some way, I believe it can be more complicated than them just hating me. Because there is a reason for everything, right? And if it really is my fault I'd like to know to either change it or accept that I really shouldn't be friends with that person.
Doesn't that make sense?

>>936038690
>it reads that way
Yes, I am being manipulative to my manipulative friends. I think that's fair lol.
>You're not being clear, and you're acting passive-aggressive.
I can't be clear about something I only have half-information about, can I?
>Change yourself, then, and your approach Etc.
>>936038690
I do change when people are forward with me, or realize that we should not be friends and we part amicably. It's so much better to live life that way.
>>936038817
If you think that about me you would absolutely think that about them too.
Could you explain why you think that about me? Is it because I use the word I too much when providing information about my own experiences? lol

>>936038780
>That isn't your problem though. No. Even though you're the one acting like a paranoid jerk, no.
No, it isn't my problem. It's theirs but I am their friend and worry about them. I used to be paranoid about it but after so many encounters it really seems like they are the paranoid ones and my suspicion is actually well placed.
>You're not being clear, and you're acting passive-aggressive.
I can't be clear about something I only have half-information about, can I?
>Change yourself, then, and your approach Etc.
>>936038690
I do change when people are forward with me, or realize that we should not be friends and we part amicably. It's so much better to live life that way.

Sorry, >>936038690. Some of >>936039051
wasn't in response to your message.

>>936038690
>That's how life works at all levels.
Indeed, but on the internet it is a very controlled mechanism.
>but you keep feeding into it, fixated on "it", whatever "it" actually is.
The context of "it" changes, anon. And I provided context.
>God help you anon.
Thanks, you too.

>>936039051
>>936039216
>>936039452
I would recommend you get help, but you make me wonder. Maybe you're right at home already. With people like yourself, so why complain at all.
Be happy. Learn to play "the game" better, and vibe with it.
Nothing more I can say.

Itt: squeaker kids larping hard like it's 1997.

>>936038852
Without more information on the scenario I can only suggest being more direct with them? If the issue at hand isn't the spying, but more so the way they use that information, why not outright say it at every turn until you either drill it into them to stop doing that or they become more direct with you as well.
If you'd rather they came at you with 'I saw you said this random thing here, let's talk about that' approach every instance of attempted manipulation with blunt but not aggressive or disapproving responses

Alternatively simply do exactly what they do to you back to them. If you believe maintaining opsec is why they refuse to accept the truth then break it and make it known no information is sacred, not even theirs, so there's no reason to hide it.

>>936039648
This is part of the game. And you're right, I am at home and familiar with how this works. I'm not upset, I'm frustrated and worried for my friends.
As for vibing, I don't think that's wise in this context. Thanks for your feedback.

>>936039830
Oh, navy. okay, well make it your own day man.
>I'm frustrated and worried for my friends.
sometimes, an honest talk makes all the difference. You have to choose timing and place right, but I mean to say when you get it out there, you can all work through it together.
>As for vibing
Yeah yeah! Lol. No engine knocking/vibing. keep those timings in check /b/rother.

>>936039687
You have a very specific mentality, Anon.
I don't recommend therapy but I think /lit/ might have some philosophical recommendations if you ever identify your penchant for shots in the dark as a problem. If it's something you have fun engaging with though, I hope my feedback helps you narrow it down. You can keep making guesses if that's the case, we can play some hot and cold.

>>936039814
I will try to be more direct, but they're so evasive I predict more failure.
As for doing the same to them, it's stupid and vain but I don't want to. I think, or fear, that it would result in the opposite of what I hope for.
>>936039946
>you can all work through it together.
Exactly. That is why I made this thread and bait them. But they have to come out of their shell on their own, I don't want to force them due to previously stated reasons.

>>936040245
>I made this thread and bait them
I doubt they will interact with it since they now know you know, if they even know at all.

>>936040402
These games, anon, are not always as simple as they seem. And they already know I know, they just FRUSTRATINGLY never confirm it.

>>936040245
>>936040402
This is also a pretty big flaw in your plan here, how certain are you they'll see this thread at all? You've posted plenty of identifying information for someone looking but /b/ is fast, this thread will be dead in less than 24 hours and I doubt your friends are so obsessed as to find this thread from an archive any time soon from your images. Bait doesn't work if you've casted it somewhere barren. Unless you have some alternative reason to suspect they'll be on this board any time soon or you lead them to it yourself they'll never find it.

>>936036594
>poser

>>936040688
/b/ isn't that fast and has archives, they check archives, might even get notifications if certain files are posted. Also, checked.
>>936040898
You're a poser? Yeah, I guess you are since you don't seem to know what we're talking about.

>>936035741
I'm 48 teehee

>>936041270
But young at heart? Hehehe

>>936041270
Most definitely, but I have no idea who tf you are and you have no idea who tf i am.
I just like schizo threads.
Go ahead and run the hash of my pic (here >>936041270) and you'll see it's never been posted.
Hey schizoanon, it's not just links and pics you post, its also how TyP3. C3rt1@n styles of post1ng are also easily rec0gnizable.

>>936041631
Yep, and I have specifically resisted using some of my favorite words ITT simply because of how infrequently anyone else uses them.

>>936041682
Not just words but replying in general. The way u type it out the grammer and the punctumatation are all identifying factors similar to handwriting analysis.
I always love when idiots include the tracking info in a jewtoob video too.

>>936041842
I always love when idiots include the tracking info in a jewtoob video too
is there any information you can actually gleam off of that? I always thought of it as just bad practice but are the SIs always the same for the same account sharing?

>>936041918
Young Padawan, that is for you to learn on your own. BTW, you can also traceroute using a .PNG with transparency.

>>936042191
>no warning

>>936041842
Yes, I call them social markers and when I was more enthusiastic I would use them like a chameleon.

>>936033328 (OP)
>>936036507
Sup retard
Giga Chad internet ruler and elite hacker here
You’re a fucking peasant and we’ll be watching u

>>936043627
Don't tell me your reading comprehension is also like his...
Actually that would explain a lot.

>>936043702
I already have access to your main frame

>>936043725
main frame my asshole retard

>>936043627
Ha, nigger didn't even post the emails or IPs of the leak of staff here.
Have this faggot

Slide my thread, I was done anyways.