Well? Any answer b/ros?

>>936240668 (OP)
17

8-5=3
5*(3)=15
2+15=17

350

>>936240668 (OP)
37

>>936240668 (OP)
π

>>936240668 (OP)
no more than 300,000

>>936240668 (OP)
Any answer other than 21 is wrong and your education system failed you.

>>936240731
Wrong

>>936240668 (OP)

17

2+5(8-5)
2+5(3)
2+15
17

>>936240668 (OP)
6,000,000

>>936240668 (OP)
The color yellow.

>>936240668 (OP)
2*8-5 + 5*8-5
Pemdas or something

>>936241021
>>936241037

How? We're using PEMDAS. Subtracted everything in the parentheses first, then multiplied with the parenthesised number, then added the two remaining numbers.

>>936240668 (OP)
PEMDAS

2+5(3)
2+15

=17

>>936240731
Fpbp

>>936241021
Never seen someone this confident and this dumb at the same time.

>>936240668 (OP)
one of the answers is: fuck this is titanic and im the ice, can i drown that man trying to switch for the little girl yet

Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger

69. Get it? Cuz sex

>>936240668 (OP)
17 as long as you follow the rules in America. If you think otherwise, you're obviously foreign and obsessed.

>>936241175
The most important facet of dickfarting is to know your limits. Over-inflating the bladder can rupture it and cause severe, life-long injuries that will not only impact your daily routine but completely destroy your capacity for any dickfarting.

Many professionals will use an air compressor to inflate their bladder, but this is only after years of training and practice under a veteran dickfarter. Less experienced persons should use a turkey baster or bicycle pump so they can better gauge just how much they can hold.

Another thing I should touch on is to use common sense when hearing rumors about various stunts in dickfarting. For example, there have been videos of 'flaming dickfarts' in which flammable gas is pumped into the urethra and bladder, then expelled and ignited. While this sounds flashy and impressive, the introduction of toxic chemicals to the urethra is a very dangerous prospect in itself, much more so if the gas ignited too quickly. Having your bladder burned from the inside out is not only horribly painful but embarrassing, and will ruin your ability to quofe (dickfart).

Another rumor floating around is that injecting air along with bubble solution will allow you to dickfart bubbles. This is only technically true in the most minor sense- you might produce some froth and spatter from your meatus, but the idea of blowing large bubbles is purely fiction. In addition, the pain that comes with bubble solution coming in contact with the urethral lining will likely leave you incapacitated to the point you'll be doing nothing but screaming and whimpering while pissing air, urine, and bubble solution everywhere. The most refined professional quofers always use a bubble wand to blow bubbles and never introduce bubble solution to the urethra.

One final subject I would like to touch on is aftercare for your urethra. It is important to drink plenty of clear water and urinate- despite any burning- to flush out any bacteria or foreign particles.

>>936240668 (OP)
2+5(8-5)
10*3
30

>>936241021
>>936241037
>>936241172
>>936241781

>>936241731
Some might suggest pumping your bladder with icy water to both flush it out and numb any pain or fatigue, but this runs risks as well. If you do decide to use this method, use only sterile saline water and disinfect everything before and after the procedure.

I had a feeling this was one of those PINGAS trick questions.

>>936241781
Wtf is this math

>>936240668 (OP)
52
>>936241172
Correct

>>936241021
not sure who's trolling who any more

2+5(8-5) = x
2+5(8)-5(5)=x
2+5(8)=5(5)+x
2+40=25+x
(2/5)+8=5+(x/5)
-(x/5)+(2/5)=5-8
-(x/5)+(2/5)=-3
-x+2=-15
-x=-17
17=x
simple as

>>936240668 (OP)
Poorly formatted. The question is incorrect and vague. Rewrite it and get back to us

>>936242330
sure is. although based on what you see, what would your guess be anon?

>>936240668 (OP)
2+5(8-5)
2+5(3)
2+15
17

Oh look. It’s 2020 era Facebook.

>>936242622
It's a legitimate regular math problem with one answer you fucking faggotnigger.

>>936242873
Which is?

Fuck this thread.

>>936240668 (OP)
Bedmas.

Brackets
8-5 = 3
exponents
division
multiplication
5x3 = 15
addition
2+15 = 17
subtraction.

17.

>>936243133
It's pemdas eurofag

>>936242873
so you were pretending to be a new poster, but you're really op trolololing?
predictable, but lol
I already answered
i wanted to know what "new anon" had to say but it was a ll a ruse
for the lulz
i love u

>>936243210
Im op, I'm not >>936242873

>>936243244 dubs
your response indicates something else

Better one that everybody fucks up

>>936242945
17. It's been shown here multiple times. If you're confused, you may have been public schooled.

>>936240668 (OP)
Potato!

>>936243375
250?

>>936243375
If the sculpture is that woman, then $0. I don't pay for women.

>>936240668 (OP)
I have a low IQ
I dont fucking know

>>936243547
The main thing is that you are a good person and love cats.

>>936243504
no i do not have 250 for you nessi

>>936243547
PEMDAS
it's the order of operations
>Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction
If you do the math in that order, you have the answer, most of the time
if you want to know what the words mean, search them online

>>936242213
>long division
Its 2025 nigger

>>936240668 (OP)
5x8=40
5x5=25
40-25=15
15+2=17
done

>>936243500
honestly, how did this shit cause such heated arguments back in the day on here!? Fucking retards

>>936240668 (OP)
17
>>936243375
250
>>936243500
50%

Y'all motherfuckers are retards.

>>936243614
Thanks I do try to be but some people still not like me. N I prefer dogs to cats butthey can be pretty cute SOMETIMES.

>>936243375
£250

p + s = 1,500 (I)
p = s + 1,000 (II)

(II) in (I):
(s + 1,000) + s = 1,500
s + 1,000 + s = 1,500
2s + 1,000 = 1,500 |-1,000
2s = 500 |/2
s = 250

>>936243642
I onlu know what the last 4 are
how does it give me the answer?

>>936243676
>250

>>936243375
$250

you fucking NERDS doing math for fun GET SWIRLIED NERDS exposing yourselves as POINDEXTER DWEEBS LOL LOSERS cry between atomic wedgies then DO SOME MORE MATH FOR FUN NERDS EXPOOOOSED LOL YOU IDIOTS FELL FOR THE TRAP NOW WE ALL KNOW YOU'RE MATH NERDS

>>936243789
What's the answer then?

>>936243795
We all know that KITT kicked KARR's ass in the biggest jump that beach had ever seen.

>>936243843
Why are you gay?

>>936243661
Because some idiots think the answer is 1/3 and will die on that hill

>>936243846
>>936243838
Are you faggots really struggling with 1500-1000?

>>936243789
ill bite how is it not 250?

1250 + 250 = 1500
1250 - 250 = 1000
the painting is 1000 dollars more expensive and the total cost is 1500.

>>936243909
You are because you didn't read the math problem correctly

>>936243711
Then everything is fine.

I hate humans, but that's okay, because most humans suck and I love cats, and dogs too. I used to be smarter, but I notice how my mental performance is declining. Fuck that.

>>936243909
wow so you're retarded

>>936243855
KITT cheated cause KARR only had those pot heads to drive him

>>936243734
you apply them in order
relate them to the symbols associated with the numbers
you don't have to know these things to live your life, but if you want to know how look at other examples in this thread such as >>936242702 and >>936242213 and >>936240731
you see the ( 8 - 5) comes first because it's in parenthesis, then you fallow suit with the implied multiplication seen as 5 x 3, then finally the addition which is 2 + 15

>>936243890
The correct answer is actually 2/3. It's called Bayes' Theorem.

>>936243504
Its 250. The painting would need to cost 1250 to be 1000 more.

>>936243500
You can eliminate the two silver boxes the moment you pulled a gold. That leaves a 2/3 chance to get gold again. 66%.

>>936243375
First I take off the fifteen percent tax from the total to reach 1275 pounds. Then I take off the 275 pound commission from the dealer. I have managed to haggle the art dealer down to just a grand for the pair. He had them marked as 11K and 12K because he is an insane JEW but I am a Hebrew too so know their actual value.I will pay my nephew two hundred thousand to deliver them to my house (he owes me sixteen million for legal fees so that's fine). I will happily tell everyone that sees them that they are worth a quarter million and insure them as such with my own company.

>>936243676
>50%

Talking a lot of retarded shit for someone calling others retards. Its 2/3 you fucking mong. I'll keep it easy for you since you're a gibbering retard who doesnt understand conditional probability... there are 3 situations.

1. You take the first gold ball from the first box, so theres 100% chance you'll pull out another gold ball, lets call this a win.

2. You take the second gold ball from the first box, again 100% of a win.

3. You take the only gold ball in the second box, 100% you wont pull out another gold ball, this is a lose.

2/3 of the situations result in you pulling out a second gold ball given the first was gold, its called Bertrand's Box Paradox

>>936243971
>That leaves a 2/3 chance to get gold again. 66%
unless you only count the box in your hand
and do not account for how it got there
then some may say 50%
it depends on how u measure it

>>936243967
NO you're fucking wrong it's 50% and it will forever be 50% no matter how many times you spam your shitty bait problem on here

>>936244032
Fucking wrong

>>936240668 (OP)
21
>y'all
Ugh

>>936243890
I thought the retards claimed it was 50? Either way 1/3, 1/2 both wrong answers, as you know

This dude always insists that the answer is ether 1/3 or 2/3 and will never explain why, he will die on that hill every time and nobody knows why

>>936240668 (OP)
Uhhhh 6?
...... 7?

>>936241781
Lost

>>936244062
You can literally just google it, top result and everything, so either you're a faggot troll or a retard, either way you're a mongoloid and should kill yourself

>>936244036
>unless you only count the box in your hand
and do not account for how it got there
>how it got there

Bro it's three boxes you pulled a Gold. The question has you pulling from the same box. The fact that you have gold eliminates the silver box being considered. That leaves 2 gold balls out of the 3 options. 2/3.

>>936244121
>will never explain why
You have 3 boxes. You removed one gold ball so there are 2 left. 2 out of 3 is 2/3.

>>936240668 (OP)
Oh look morons are doing these threads again. Bragging that they've been taught to "think" like a calculator because they're too ignorant to understand the implied parentheses shorthand that has been in common use for as long as parentheses has been a mathematical concept. Humans see this technically incorrectly written equation as 2 + (5 x (8-5)). Now if it had been correctly written as 2 + 5 x (8-5) just as a cheap calculator would require you to enter it, then literally everyone would have given you the answer you're jonesing for.

These things aren't a text of "intelligence", they're just a test as to whether you learned math prior to people requiring a calculator to do simple math (so indirectly a test of intelligence)

>>936240668 (OP)
I think this guy answered it well, I only wanted to add that some people can't hear their inner voice and therefore can't do what they're supposed to do.

>>936244036
>it depends on how u measure it

lol no it fucking doesn't anon, thats retarded as fuck

>>936244270
Idiot

>>936240668 (OP)
do you even PEMDAS, bro?

>>936240668 (OP)
21

>>936244233 Dubs
>>936244323
I am accounting for others' logic
not my own
the way the question is phrased implies a box in hand
and so this obfuscates the reality of the situation
misleading the interpreter to only account for the box in hand
you thought i was disagreeing with you? oh the rapturous laughter! the purest irony!
learn2Engrish fren :^))

>>936240668 (OP)
17
2+5 = 7
(8-5)=10
10+7=17

>>936243375
P+S = 1500

But, the paining is a thousand more so we can write that as P = S+1000

So:

S+1000+S = 1500
2S+1000=1500
2S=1500-1000
2S=500
S=250

>>936244233
But you're choosing the box, not the balls. The chance of choosing the right box initially is 1/3. The chance that you have chosen the right box after pulling one gold is then at 1/2. You don't get to change your choice at any point so the chances of getting it right is 1/3 boosted up to 50/50 if you get one gold first.

>>936244429
There is literally no misinterpretation of this problem, moron. What there actually is - is a bunch of mongs and retards who take intuitive guesses at whats a very simple and straightforward conditional probability question because they dont know what the fuck they're talking about. But hey, keep being an ignorant retard who thinks he's right

Okay, I picked a box. It had a gold ball in it.
There are now only two balls in the box — one of which I've already seen.
So there’s one unknown ball left. It could be gold, it could be silver.

50/50

>>936244735
there clearly are many misinterpretations of this question
hence my speaking for the others who only account for the box in hand, and not how it got there

>>936244598
No, it literally tells you that you've picked a box at random and pulled a gold ball from it. So you know you're only dealing with the GG box or the GS box, the question has eliminated any chance of you pulling the SS box!

>>936244735
A bunch of mongs and retards who think the answer is 2/3, yes

>>936240668 (OP)
it's 21 you stupid son of a bitches

>>936244598
>But you're choosing the box, not the balls

You're not choosing anything. The decisions were made in the question. You have to determine what type of box you have and what is left as an option.

The silver/silver box isn't the one in hand because you have Gold. That leaves two boxes with gold in them. 2 gold balls and 1 silver ball can be your next random pick.

The problem with the 50% people is they're ignoring the box not in hand.

>>936244833
No, there are many retards, that is all. Check this nigger
>>936244598
he literally thinks theres a 1/3 chance of getting the GG box at the start because there are 3 boxes, when the question has straight up told you that you've already chosen a box containing at least one gold ball so that is categorically not the case. This is not an ambiguously worded question anon, there's just people who don't know how to read, can't do that math and that don't have the fucking hubris to admit they're wrong when it's proven why its 2/3

>>936245179
50%*
Ftfy

>>936245179
>No
>goes on to prove my point that others interpret the question differently
lol

>>936245052
>The problem with the 50% people is they're ignoring the box not in hand.
*They're only accounting for the box in hand.

>>936241037
Order of operations means 17 is correct. If you want the answer to be something other than 17, you can use more parenthesis to override the order of operations in the equation.

>>936245300
Interpreting the question wrong... isn't an interpretation, its just being wrong and a retard. Pretty embarrassing you need pointing out to you,

>>936245346
You understood what I said. This is math class.

>>936245535
You didn't understand me, however :^)

>>936245504
>interpreting is not interpreting
lol
lmao

>>936243500
This is a word problem and not a math problem. That's the issue. I thought someone on youtube would have created a video where they manually do this experiment 100 times, but couldn't find one. Lots of people explaining it, but no one actually pulling balls.

30

>>936245930
Its easy to see it from both angles. To see if you only measure the one box in your hand the outcome is X, and if you correctly measure all the steps from the beginning, it's Y.

>>936245930
You can do this with 3 pennies (gold) and 3 nickels (silver). Just put them in 3 containers as the question stated.

>2 pennies
>2 nickels
>1 penny 1 nickel

Come back and join the 2/3 club.

>>936246191
The SS box is a ruse. It never matters because you never draw a second time if you choose silver. You have two boxes, because you've already drawn a G.

>>936246326
It's still part of the equation. It may not play a direct role in the outcome, yet it's still part of the units being measured against one another.
I see what you mean to say though.
It only factors in during a test in reality, but it has no bearing in this example because it does not come into play directly.

>>936246565
Yeah. I've read the wikipedia and a few other explanations at this point and my issue is always with the wording of the explanation. I'm sure I'm wrong, but I haven't found an explanation I'm ok with.

>>936246663
It's worded vaguely for a reason. I refer to is as "ruse ball" for good reason.
You can interpret either outcome, and both have their merits and logic/reasoning. So both are true in a sense of the word, but mathematically speaking, one is more correct than the other.