>>936289019>while US positioning generally protects societies where people can actually choose their government and live with basic freedoms.Does it?
Was the US protecting societies when it installed the Shah in Iran in the 1953 coup?
Or was it protecting oil interests?
Was it protecting societies in Chile when they installed the Pinochet junta in place of a democratically elected leader, leading to 40,000 people being killed by the state?
Were they protecting people's interests when they gave Saddamn Hussein nerve gases, which he used on the Kurdish civilians?
Were thy protecting interests of the people when they deposed him, unleashing bloody conflict that killed at least half a million people, and potentially as many as a million - the true number unknown because who cares about "raghead muslims", eh?
The US protects the interests of the US. nothing more.