Thanks, RFK, for removing this toxic garbage from our drinking water!

enjoy your rotting teeth

Are they still putting chlorine in nigger cum?

>>936727856 (OP)
Nice

>>936727856 (OP)
A few years from now, Florida will re-learn just why we started fluoridating drinking water in the first place when Florida suddenly has the worst teeth in the nation.

>>936728247
White "people" aren't really known for having nice teeth.

>>936728297
Whatever you say, poopie

Poop water

>>936727856 (OP)
>MFW rotting teeth

>>936729115
Bits o corn innit?

>>936728010
>enjoy your rotting teeth
Fluoride causes teeth to rot.

>>936727856 (OP)
dentists will make more money

>>936729306
exactly opposite

you are an idiot

>>936728297
>White "people" aren't really known for having nice teeth.
t.

>>936729358
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_fluorosis

experimentation on american people, ehhh guess the people really did not want testing to continue on Israelis and palestinas nice of them to keep paying the test subjects even though they are not part of the experiment now.

>>936727856 (OP)
I don't want brown hands touching my water's controls

>>936729477
weirdly same, also feel odd about brown hands in waste treatment, and flying planes. this is a recent change.

>>936727856 (OP)
cibo per I vermi

>>936729306
Yes, fluoride at twice the maximum limit is bad, what a shocker, retard! Fluoride at greater than 1.5mg/L decreases IQ in children.

>>936729872
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/publications/monographs/mgraph08

>>936729443
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_fluorosis
"If the water supply is fluoridated at the level of 1 ppm, one must consume one litre of water in order to take in 1 mg of fluoride. It is thus improbable a person will receive more than the tolerable upper limit from consuming optimally fluoridated water alone." from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_fluorosis#Epidemiology

>>936729940
You don't know anything about scientific research. You have no idea how to read and comprehend published research.

Shut the fuck up, retard.

>>936729872
>Fluoride at greater than 1.5mg/L decreases IQ in children.
This is the reason why TPTB fluoridates drinking water. It never had anything to do with "teeth health" or whatever bullshit they told you. They want to bring the IQ of citizens down so that they're easier to control, period. Its also why TPTB push for replacement immigration from low IQ countries for the same reason.

>>936730031
Don't give these retards answers.

>>936730031
>it is improbably that a person would drink a liter or more of water a day
Nigger, I drink like a gallon of water a day.

>>936728010
Just brush regularly and it will be fine, fluoride is both an inhibitor and exacerbator of tooth rot. It works fine in regular scenarios but actually helps bacterium create a niche once tooth rot has started.

>>936730043
It's a U.S. published government article, why are you triggered about research???
>>936730061
>They want to bring the IQ of citizens down so that they're easier to control, period. Its also why TPTB push for replacement immigration from low IQ countries for the same reason.
Why would the "THEY!" want to decrease their labor force's IQ, Do they dislike efficiency?
>>936730174
>Nigger, I drink like a gallon of water a day.
That would be ~5 mg of fluoride which is half of the upper-limit (10 mg) source: https://web.archive.org/web/20140710090112/http://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Member%20Center/FIles/fluoridation_facts.ashx

>>936730373
>>936730174
Question 20. Table 3.

>>936730373
>Why would the "THEY!" want to decrease their labor force's IQ, Do they dislike efficiency?
I explained the why in the same post you're responding to. Dumb people are easier to control. Dumb people don't question authority. That's why a dumb person like you is preferable to them than a high IQ person like Ted Kaczinski who is able to figure things out. You're too stupid to be any threat to them. You've also been Vaxxed and Fluoridated your whole life. Maybe you're not genetically stupid, but you've just been brought to this point by the poisons they've put in you. Either way, the end result is the same.

>>936727856 (OP)
The pacification of the many in terms of statistical slightness goes unnoticed, so too will the return of the slight increase in emotional excess.

It was not worth it.

>>936728247
>he thinks fluoride is in the water for your teeth
100 IQ

>>936731189
>Dumb people are easier to control. Dumb people don't question authority. That's why a dumb person like you is preferable to them than a high IQ person like Ted Kaczinski
... And I explained that "they" probably wouldn't enjoy hurting their bottom line with low-IQ, unskilled workers. Why do they need to control the masses? The primary goal of companies is to get you to pay for their shit, you can't do that if you're an idiot who can't work a skilled job.
>You've also been Vaxxed and Fluoridated your whole life.
>Maybe you're not genetically stupid, but you've just been brought to this point by the poisons they've put in you.
Explain to me the mechanism by which vaccines decrease IQ. "Individuals with the highest cognitive ability score attained a vaccination rate of 80% within 50 days of COVID-19 vaccine availability. Comparatively, those with the lowest cognitive scores reached 80% vaccine update after 180 days." from: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230912/Does-IQ-influence-COVID-19-vaccination-decision-making.aspx
>picrel
"to prevent frequent job turnover caused by hiring overqualified applicants", did you read your picture?

>>936731942
>vaccinations have an immediately response to your IQ
you should learn about eugenics

>highest cognitive ability score
because IQ is "bullshit" right? lol the highest IQ people didn't get vaccinated, just the midwit 110-120 "I'm a genius" redditors

>>936730043
It's written in english. It's not that hard.

>>936731942
>The primary goal of companies
We're not talking about companies. TPTB that want to make and keep you stupid are the ones who are able to create money out of thin air. Ted Kazinski understood. Ezra Pound understood. Bobby Fisher understood. But you are too stupid to get it. You are focused on those who rank way down on the hierarchy. You don't have a clue who are the ones at the top who are behind everything.

>>936732303
>you should learn about eugenics
I'm pro-Eugenics.
>because IQ is "bullshit" right? lol the highest IQ people didn't get vaccinated, just the midwit 110-120 "I'm a genius" redditors
No, I definitely don't believe that "IQ is bullshit"; stanine classes are IQ-equivalent, that's why I used it when talking about IQ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanine#Calculation
>>936732961
Yes, I understand that the Rothschilds have ~222 billion each.

>>936733221
IQ is a garbage metric. Getting shot with the covid vaccine was retarded to do based on the data coming in.

>>936727856 (OP)
>meanwhile the water in Flynt Michigan is still flammable

>>936733341
>IQ is a garbage metric. Getting shot with the covid vaccine was retarded to do based on the data coming in.
Are you the same guy? How is IQ "a garbage metric"? How is Covid-19 vaccination "retarded"? You're just saying things. "health care systems during January 2021–January 2022, showed that the risk for cardiac complications was significantly higher after COVID-19 infection than after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among persons aged ≥5 years (8). Data from CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics show a background mortality rate from diseases of the heart among Oregonians aged 15–34 years of 2.9 and 4.1 deaths per 100,000, during 2019 and 2021" https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7314a5.htm

>>936733809
The people saying trust the science, were not scientists.
The vaccine is not actually a defined vaccine according to the real definition, it is experimental.

The resulting complications from the vaccine killed more young people and left many with long-term conditions. You people just panicked because the old were popping off, that is what the old do, FFS.

IQ is a garbage metric, and I score 147.

>>936733809
>How is IQ "a garbage metric"?

IQ in layman's terms:
1. Does not account for cultural ability to conform and succeed.
2. Does not account for failure to assign paranoia when trust in systems exceeds the system's relative statistical proof of that system's failures to correctly assert solutions in the past.
3. Does not account for emotional intelligence and faith-based precision of counterintellectual interpretation of data to suit the statistical unlikelihood of the choice being a critical one.
4. does not account for knowledge of data interpretation techniques, alternative to the test creators' expectations.
5. Does not account for higher intellectual capability in the test taker than the test creator.
6. Does not account for systematic bias inherent in testing methodologies.
7. Does not account for the simple fact that intelligence, when perfect, sits quietly and does not engage with questions about its own capabilities.

>>936734149
>The vaccine is not actually a defined vaccine according to the real definition, it is experimental.
They've changed the definition. mRNA vaccines have been tested in mice since before 2008 and have went through human trials since 2013 (over 12 years ago).
>The resulting complications from the vaccine killed more young people and left many with long-term conditions.
No, they didn't. "Among the 925 male decedents, no death certificate listed vaccination either as the immediate or as a contributing cause of death. Overall, 17 (2%) deaths among males were attributed to COVID-19. Death certificates cited noncardiac causes of death or other conditions contributing to death for 842 (91%) of the male decedents. Among the remaining 66 (7%) male decedents, excluding a cardiac cause of death based on the death certificate was not possible. Among these 66 decedents, IIS vaccination records were available for 58 (88%); receipt of at least one mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was recorded for 24 (41%)." from >>936733809 CDC.
>IQ is a garbage metric, and I score 147.
"it is because I say so!". Did you score that on an internet test, or was it proctored? What Standard Deviation was used (σ)?

>>936734790
There are statistical methods that absolutely account for those. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_invariance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_item_functioning#Item_response_theory

>>936734898
>and have failed every human trial since 2013 (over 12 years ago).
ftfy

>>936727856 (OP)

>>936734898
>no death certificate listed vaccination
The system was biased towards not listing deaths as vaccine-related and still is, any fool with an intellectual grasp of how society is primarily run by children knows this.
>>936735049
I am not saying it is not indicative of potential, when applied as a method of filter, I am saying it is not accounting for everything, any IQ test creator will tell you that.

You could have a very high IQ and not be able to remember the details of strategic importance relative to your career path very often.

You are interpreting data based on your bias again.

>>936735049
Those with high intelligence that is not mapped by tests are aware of their flaws and mostly do not attempt to get into positions of authority or extreme stress.

The IQ of those who generally do try to gain careers of such value and stress level is definitely tested as intended to filter out those who do not accurately conform to the system's expectations. Those with vastly high intelligence are very often wanting to do a medium skill job to simply pay for their lifestyle and nothing more. The man with the highest IQ in the world is a bouncer; he is an example of someone with genuine intelligence, not simply testable intelligence. He has flaws still despite 200 IQ, and he resides in those flaws contentedly without wanting to hear about them.

If the people become enthralled with IQ tests to the point society filters out the supposedly inferior in a manner that is deemed unethical 200+ IQ individuals will emerge, having never taken a test, to put the world to rights.

You people walk a dangerous line believing IQ is a metric that dictates superiority and success.
Primarily because you can only hold one set of variables in your head at any moment like most people.

>>936734898
>"it is because I say so!". Did you score that on an internet test, or was it proctored? What Standard Deviation was used (σ)?

I score a varied range of IQ outcomes when attempting any test group.
Above average to sub-genius.

I do not require to understand that YOU think this one is better than that one, and that is wise.

All tests are measuring some form of intelligence.

My absolute test of intelligence is my entire life's output in the universal flow.

>>936727856 (OP)
> YEAH I LOVE FIGHTING THE CULTURE WARS FROM 1945! THESE ARE THE THINGS WE NEED TO BE SPENDING OR 6 TIME AND EFFORT ON IN 2025!!! WOO!

>>936737136
:)

Yeah, perfect intelligence doth bend to a smile in your presence.

Keep the faith, brother/sister.

>>936735237
Okay, thank you. XD
>>936735576
>The system was biased
-_______-
>any fool with an intellectual grasp of how society is primarily run by children knows this.
Are you telling me that society is run by children???
>I am saying it is not accounting for everything, any IQ test creator will tell you that.
I never said "the test itself accounts for EVERYTHING!".
>You could have a very high IQ and not be able to remember the details of strategic importance relative to your career path very often.
That depends on age, how high of an IQ, brain damage/disorder/specific deficit... etc.
>>936736956
>do not require to understand that YOU think this one is better than that one, and that is wise.
So, you used an internet test, mister genius. XD
>All tests are measuring some form of intelligence.
I'm guessing you mean "cognitive tests" if so, I agree, the measured correlation between most cognitive tasks and g is between 0.4–0.5.
>My absolute test of intelligence is my entire life's output in the universal flow.
>>>/x/

>>936738076
Must be pretending.

So whilst I am defending my IQ announcement, I will state that the approximate IQ average I attain on all recognised tests is around 133.

I am aware of the reasons why my real IQ as measured in a utopian future, is actually much higher. The knowledge I hold about utopian wisdom is greater than anyone I have ever met and until it is understood that a more accurate IQ test measures this phenomena, I will be stuck in the mediocrity of my peers, a slightly above high-order midwit to the system of scientific ethical betterment.

I am not Einstein, but I am not a peon.

>>936738076
The children of inferior agendas run the downward flowing strategic failure to compute solutions, because it is difficult to convince an average intelligence population to see the facts.
They do not want to be cast out when they are wise and intelligent; they are fully aware that THE TIME IS NOW and THE BETTERMENT OF SELF IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE ARGUMENT WITH EVERYONE.

IQ does not measure memory capability, and it is possible to have a genetic predisposition to differences in long-term and short-term and relevance-based memory acquisition.

There are things I do not know about this because I am isolated from the experts, and AI is not necessarily capable of issuing a highly accurate and unbiased response which resonates with my questions. But alas, I could ask.

>>936738129
No, you're specifically obfuscating the "test" that was "used" (it was an internet test).
>So whilst I am defending my IQ announcement, I will state that the approximate IQ average I attain on all recognised tests is around 133.
Lmao, why did you say it was 147, then?
>I am aware of the reasons why my real IQ as measured in a utopian future, is actually much higher. The knowledge I hold about utopian wisdom is greater than anyone I have ever met and until it is understood that a more accurate IQ test measures this phenomena, I will be stuck in the mediocrity of my peers, a slightly above high-order midwit to the system of scientific ethical betterment.
Why are you coping about "having" a 133 IQ average (on an internet test)?
>The children of inferior agendas run the downward flowing strategic failure to compute solutions
Let me get this straight: Are you talking about actual children or metaphorical ones?
>IQ does not measure memory capability, and it is possible to have a genetic predisposition to differences in long-term and short-term and relevance-based memory acquisition.
Yes it does. you can have small genetic differences, yes.
>There are things I do not know about this because I am isolated from the experts, and AI is not necessarily capable of issuing a highly accurate and unbiased response which resonates with my questions. But alas, I could ask.
Just contact an expert or read more stuff.

>>936738129
Yeah, maybe the world is full of midwits and a couple or three pretenders that spend their lives lying to prevent complete idiocy because the truth results in chaos?

Whatever

>>936739065
>(it was an internet test).
Effectively, every form of standardised test is available on the internet, and there is a slight difference when I order an elite test and pay good money.

You have some crazy, biased arguments that are fundamentally unintelligent.


MY IQ has been steadily going up throughout my life, and I have no need to go to a location to get the results of a test, which is, in essence, the same.

If there are tests that measure more accurately, please inform me, and I will consider it because it is a bit novel, despite being unimportant.

I am not upset that I have a low IQ compared to some, because as I said, it is currently a very limited way of defining intelligence.

>>936739065
>Let me get this straight: Are you talking about actual children or metaphorical ones?
On what planet would actual children be invisibly running the world? Get a stem that has neurons in it. :)

>>936739648
>Effectively, every form of standardised test is available on the internet
Some old CTT ones that are self-proctored and usually based on internet samples, sure.
>there is a slight difference when I order an elite test and pay good money.
Are these "elite" tests self-proctored?
>MY IQ has been steadily going up throughout my life
You took more tests, and now the retest effect is taking hold (the g-loading is decreasing).
>If there are tests that measure more accurately, please inform me, and I will consider it because it is a bit novel, despite being unimportant.
You didn't even say which ones you actually took, you only referred to "elite" and "internet" tests as a whole.
>On what planet would actual children be invisibly running the world? Get a stem that has neurons in it. :)
Guess why I linked >>>/x/ before.

>>936728247
Care to explain why countries in Europe that stopped fluoridating their water in the 70s for some reason have no different in dental health quality as the ones who still do?

>>936740348
Care to explain your retarded claim???

>>936729477
White kids are too lazy and entitled nowadays to want to do the jobs their father and grandfathers did.

>>936740219
If you cannot be arsed to tell me what you are saying is the right test, I cannot be arsed to start digging up websites to map my historical journey through testing.

I have developed strategies for raising my IQ, it has little to do with repeat testing on similar tests. In fact, if I repeat tests, I get the same response because I use intelligence, not memory.

There are some flaws in my prior strategy so my estimated IQ is in fact higher by average than I deduced as 133, however it is entirely possible I can take a test and find myself in the region of 120 IQ if the test is foreign enough and designed by divergences to systematic parameters that dictate unknown variables. I doubt it will ever be lower, but stuff happens, and I would be content to know I have something to learn about an alternate system's rules.

I am aware I have flaws and my strategic capabilities are limited to my scope of knowledge so IQ is but a tedium.

I have had enough of this conversation. I think it is time for me to begin responding in Buddhist terms and avoiding debates on intelligence to keep the peace and give me peace.

On that note, the difference of each unique journey to the next is sufficient that stating intellectual superiority is a flawed and imbalanced disharmony with universal truths, which supersede the intellectual capability of non-divine minds to establish perfect clarity. There is one intelligence, and it is all.

>>936727856 (OP)
Here a reminder
Science with few exemption chemistry and math,
does not make proof, nothing is set in cement, it's always subject to change with new discoveries.
opinion are welcome in science. we use "The available evidence strongly suggests this hypothesis is true"

>>936740348
>>936740493
You both seem unaware that the population is a case study in best-guess testing of potential benefits throughout all time. We still live in the dark ages and people are no-longer taken from their lives to be tested on, but are so without clarity that a test can be on them in a moment and last for decades and they just suck up one side or the other without seeing that a real free person has choice and should navigate to use it.

>>936727856 (OP)
Another in a long list of reasons to be glad I don't live in fucking Florida.

>>936730373
You didnt read it, retard.

>>936732422
You didn't read it, retard. You don't even know what it says.

>>936734790
tell me you're a jeet without telling me you wish you were white

only people who claim IQ is garbage are races who are inferior (not east asians)

>>936741830
>Another in a long list of reasons to be glad I don't live in fucking Florida.
Why do you need big daddy gubmint to add fluoride to your drinking water? Why don't you add it to your own drinking water if you want it so bad? But you just want to force other people to be poisoned by it.

>>936742094
>other people to be poisoned by it.

Russians being dead is a net benefit for everyone.

>>936741981
I've read scientific literature before. It's best not to click any links posted on 4chan or to look them up later as it makes the gangstalking easier.

>>936740510
No, they'd rather use their degrees to perform high-skilled labor. https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2021/data-on-display/education-pays.htm
>I cannot be arsed to start digging up websites to map my historical journey through testing.
A test that is proctored by a professional (not you, because professionals aren't allowed to self-test or self-diagnose), is itself a professional test (WAIS IV/V, WC&J, SB-V, RPM/RAPM, ASVAB... etc), is not taken online and is not practiced for (practice decreases the g-loading).
>I have developed strategies for raising my IQ
This has never been done. What "strategies"?
>it is entirely possible I can take a test and find myself in the region of 120 IQ if the test is foreign enough and designed by divergences to systematic parameters that dictate unknown variables.
The hint is "foreign", this is just the retest effect.
>I think it is time for me to begin responding in Buddhist terms
Are you Asian???
>>936741514
>Science with few exemption chemistry and math,
does not make proof
Chemistry definitely doesn't have proofs, and math isn't science (although they are related).

>>936741968
How??? XDDD
>>936742176
"Gangstalking" is always my greatest concern. XD

>>936742296
It's best to limit trackers

>>936740493
Sure though the reader is the retarded part. The claim couldn't be any simpler but I'll try my best.

Many European countries stopped fluoridating their water in the 70s while others continued to do so. The rate of cavities across these nations did not differ from each other. Was that easy enough to follow or should I make it even less steps? You stupid deficient chimp nigger.

>>936730258
>source: my retarded american anus

>>936727856 (OP)
There was a simple switch? What chance was there in the past people accidentily switched it off?

>>936743351
>There was a simple switch? What chance was there in the past people accidentily switched it off?
Well then, I guess in that case during that period of time people weren't being poisoned by some harmful shit being added into their drinking water.

>>936742492
>Many European countries stopped fluoridating their water in the 70s while others continued to do so. The rate of cavities across these nations did not differ from each other.
If you'd take a minute to stop jerking yourself off with the rest of your post, you'd realize I was talking about actual data; I want you to give me a study that says "European countries that stopped fluoridating their water still had good teeth" or something to that effect.
"A total of 155 studies met the inclusion criteria; 107 studies provided sufficient data for quantitative synthesis.
The results from the caries severity data indicate that the initiation of water fluoridation results in reductions in dmft of 1.81 (95% CI 1.31 to 2.31; 9 studies at high risk of bias, 44,268 participants) and in DMFT of 1.16 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.61; 10 studies at high risk of bias, 78,764 participants). This translates to a 35% reduction in dmft and a 26% reduction in DMFT compared to the median control group mean values. There were also increases in the percentage of caries free children of 15% (95% CI 11% to 19%; 10 studies, 39,966 participants) in deciduous dentition and 14% (95% CI 5% to 23%; 8 studies, 53,538 participants) in permanent dentition. The majority of studies (71%) were conducted prior to 1975 and the widespread introduction of the use of fluoride toothpaste." from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6953324/

>>936733221
>I'm pro-Eugenics.
It is always thee stupid cunts who think they would be chosen to carry on their genes. You really do not seem to grasp that you would be filtered in a eugenics program. Not only would you be filtered but you would be denied privileges of those who are considered more genetically gifted. Keep playing this stupid game.

>>936731189
So, were people generally smarter before fluoridation of water became standardized, before 1945?

>>936727856 (OP)
what kind of poor faggot drinks water from the sink

>>936742176
hey, western decline. how's your day going?

PIZZA

>>936743194
>source: my retarded american anus

>>936744529
oh nooo a sharty.jpg
>ive just lost the argument

>>936737136
>our 6 time
You can spend your 7 time elsewhere.

>>936743194
I'm sorry youre mad that it's a loose science
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6195894/

>>936744897
thanks for admitting defeat. I didn't want to have to call you a nigger.

What are we to do with the fluorinated industrial mining waste now?

>>936745498
Sure kid

>>936744415
>what kind of poor faggot drinks water from the sink
Niggers that live in Flint.