Ever wonder what would happen if we just deleted all parasites from the planet? No more tapeworms, lice, malaria, or any of the other biological freeloaders dragging us down. Sounds like utopia, right?

Turns out, it’s not that simple.

Parasites regulate populations, support food webs, train immune systems, and drive evolution.
Over 40% of species on Earth are parasites. Removing them would cause ecosystem collapse, immune dysfunction, and mass extinction—ironically leading to more suffering, not less.

But here's the twist: we could replace all their functions artificially.

>Engineer synthetic symbionts to fill their niche.
>Build microbial "gyms" to train the immune system without real infection.
>Use biotech, CRISPR, and nanomedicine to simulate natural evolutionary pressure.
>Manually rebalance ecosystems using AI, drones, and biofeedback systems.

Basically, humanity would have to take over the job nature gave to disease and parasitism—without the suffering.

If we pulled that off, we could go further: eliminate all pathogens. No viruses, no bacteria, no infections—ever again.

No more pandemics, no more aging from immune system decline, no need for the medical-industrial death cult.
But we'd also lose the evolutionary pressure that made us strong in the first place.

To fix that, we'd simulate disease pressure digitally, or build challenge into our biology and culture on purpose. We'd become the authors of our own evolution.

It wouldn’t just be a war against suffering—it would be the end of natural selection as we know it.

Imagine a world where:

>No one dies of infection.

>Ecosystems are carefully tended, not violently “balanced.”

>Every living thing is part of a consciously designed biosphere.

>Evolution is optional.

What we call "parasitism" might just be a placeholder for something better.

Is it possible to kill off every parasite and every disease without destroying life itself?

What would a world like that even mean?

>>936822765 (OP)
Ever wonder what would happen if we just deleted all niggers from the planet? No more chimps, yard apes, moon crickets, or any of the other biological freeloaders dragging us down. Sounds like utopia, right?

Turns out, it’s really just that simple.

>Niggers don't work.
>They compose less than 15% of the world population, but contribute to over 50% of violent crimes.

But here's the twist: we could replace all their functions artificially just 'cause.

>Engineer synthetic niggers to "peacefully protest."
>Build mock "prisons" to train security officers without real incarceration.
>Use black paint to simulation excess melanin.
>Manually construct Popeye's fast food restaurants.

Basically, humanity would have to take over the job nature gave to niggers—without the suffering.

If we pulled that off, we could go further: eliminate all brownoids. No Sandniggers, no Jeets, no Subhumans—ever again.

No more DEI hires, no more getting shot in the street, no need for the vast majority of prisons.
But we'd also lose the evolutionary pressure that made us strong in the first place.

To fix that, we'd simulate White Power digitally, or build challenge into our biology and culture on purpose. We'd become the authors of our own evolution.

It wouldn’t just be a war against suffering—it would be the end of natural selection as we know it.

Imagine a world where:

>No one dies of Black on White crime.
>Ecosystems are carefully tended, not violently “enriched.”
>Every living thing is part of a consciously designed biosphere.
>Evolution is optional.

What we call "racism" might just be a placeholder for something better.

Is it possible to kill off every nigger and every brownoid without destroying life itself?

What would a world like that even mean?

>>936822827
least edgy 4chan user

>>936822765 (OP)
You've posted this half-halfed bullshit before.

You have no fucking idea what you're talking about and you are, as always, a fucking idiot. But with a massive case of Dunning-Kruger