Moon Landing

>>936860533 (OP)
Nern Erevern

>>936860533 (OP)
This picture is retarded on so many levels I’m guessing it’s just bait.

>>936860533 (OP)
The Martians definitely did NOT flee Mars in 1907 and seek asylum on Earth. They definitely do NOT live in the sewers and visit me in the wee hours of the night.

>>936860561
Can't fool us anymore, John.

>>936860882
Mind Blown

>>936860533 (OP)
wasted bot dubs.

>>936860957

>>936860533 (OP)
https://youtu.be/_0fQxFj03aM?t=102

Epstein

- Posted from the White House

>>936860533 (OP)
Dumbass

>>936860533 (OP)
I legit thought this wasn't bait for 2.000001 seconds -__-

>>936860561
how did NASA supposedly send people to the Moon almost 60 years ago but then never again?

>>936860533 (OP)

>>936860533 (OP)
Slavery. Blacks were never slaves. They're just illegal immigrants from Africa who made up a story to try to get free shit from the US.

>>936862613
Whites were put into "indentured servitude" as well as blacks were sold from Africans into slavery in America.

>>936862295
no there wouldn't

>>936862725
Fake

>>936862917
What, specifically, was fake (Whites were put into "indentured servitude", blacks were sold from Africans into slavery in America. )?

>>936862548
the moon landings were a propaganda exercise.

do you see any soviets around the place, launching spaceships to the moon or mars, to demonstrate the superiority of the Communist Man?

no, me neither.

And therefore, when the US won the goal of being the first on the moon, there was no more incentive to go back.
And when the Soviet missile technology was eclipsed by the mid-70's, there was no incentive for a massive rocket programme for anything outside of low earth orbit.

Its not complex.

>Be Litvinenko
>Expose FSB's role in the Moscow Apartment Bombings
>Be assassinated on foreign soil for exposing the FSB
Russia didn't ACTUALLY bomb its own people. They just killed Litvenenko because... uh... just to prove they could! Yeah, that's why!

>>936862994
Blacks weren't slaves. It's all fake.

>>936863172
And frankly, probably wouldn't have done it if Kennedy hadn't been assassinated. They only pushed the funding through as a tribute to him.

>>936863172
uh,lame excuse. If sending people to the Moon and successfully bring them back in security was really feasible,there still would've been several other missions. There's A LOT more to learn about its surface, composition, atmosphere and such. Like,there would be a astronomical observations facility overs there,for instance. The 1969 Moon landing is a hoax and I'm tired of people claiming it isn't

>>936860533 (OP)
OP's mom spending 48 hours without getting shitfaced.

>>936863834
>uh,lame excuse. If sending people to the Moon and successfully bring them back in security was really feasible,there still would've been several other missions.
There WERE several other missions. The Apollo program didn't end with the first moon landing.

>>936862613
That makes sense.

>>936863834
>there still would've been several other missions.
There were, you stupid, fucking, brainlet.

>>936860533 (OP)
Provocation by Obama and Biden. The scene was filmed by Cuban migrants near the presidential palace in Haiti. After that, the palace was blown up and the Cubans were drowned. This fake film was used by the Democrats to unleash unmotivated repression against Trump supporters.

>>936860533 (OP)
Holocaust

>>936864185
>>936864032
and what's the explanation for not even more missions being made ever since? As far as I know the annual budget from NASA totally allows it

>>936867965
>As far as I know the annual budget from NASA totally allows it
There would literally have been no point for humans to visit the moon at the time (the space race had already finished). NASA are already planning to go back to the moon by 2027: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_III

>>936867965
>As far as I know the annual budget from NASA totally allows i
Also, this might not be true due to Trump attempting to cripple even more science: https://www.space.com/space-exploration/every-living-former-nasa-science-chief-opposes-trumps-proposed-budget-cuts-in-letter-to-congress

>>936868696
>NASA are already planning to go back to the moon by 2027
why didn't they do it like 20 years ago or so?

>>936870133
>why didn't they do it like 20 years ago or so?
I already told you, here's an excerpt: "There would literally have been no point for humans to visit the moon at the time (the space race had already finished)."

>>936870133
Because congress doesn't want to fund it. We only did it the first time as a tribute to Kennedy. If he hadn't been shot, we probably wouldn't have done it.