Someone pleas explain something to me.
In modern society it is understood that men and women are equal in terms of mental capability. It is also understood that men have the advantage in terms of physical capability. Any action we take is some combination of our mental and physical capabilities.
Following this logic, does it not mean that men are inherently superior to women? In any action that is 100% mental, they are equal to women. And in any action that involves physical capability, they have an advantage. Therefore, how can we possibly say that men are not inherently superior to women?

>>937220700 (OP)
If you're so superior why don't you ever get some pussy you incel?

>>937220729
I'm a woman.

>>937220767
You wish incel tranny

>>937220783
You seem angry.

>>937220729
Kys glownigger swine lulz fck kys glownigger

>>937220700 (OP)
>In modern society it is understood that men and women are equal in terms of mental capability.
Your logic is founded on incorrect assumptions of false absolutes. Mental capability is both scalar, and situationally dependent. Men and women may have the capacity for similar levels of efficacy, but just as a PC is different to a laptop, both can ultimately do the same things but in different circumstances one may be better suited than the other.

>It is also understood that men have the advantage in terms of physical capability.
To analogise again, you can get from A to B in a car or a semi trick, but depending on a number of other criteria one may be better suited than the other. You may reaffirm your statement by using athletic prowess as an example, and by doing so you would be narrowing your scope of "physical capability" quite significantly. There's more to physical action than running quick and throwing spears.

>Any action we take is some combination of our mental and physical capabilities.
Indeed, you are correct on a surface level. There is significant feedback between mental and physical potentiality that drives decision making and action taking in both which again gives rise to situational advantages and disadvantages. To examplify (through gross generalisation) women are generally more emotionally driven than men, and excel in environments demanding as such; e.g. teaching & care industries. Women and men are broadly equal in puristic creativity, but there is thematic differentiation. Men are generally physically stronger than women, excelling at manual labor.

Modern society recognises that the "men are superior" logic is a misfounded and inaccurate assessment of human capability. Historically, the male strength advantage succeeds at dominating society, because it is relatively easy to silence others through violence, and thus women have always had that boot against their heads.

Tldr: fuck off boomerfag with your outdated patriarchal bias.

>>937221317
if the majority of people think women are capable in the same way men are than they would act in such a way to prove this

>>937220783
I'm not a tranny, you are the tranny, you jew!

Evolution theory is false

>>937221317
Cope. Every circumstance a man is better. Emotional understanding or communication or inventing or economy or war. Men are even better at being softer.
Women only excel at being confused or unethical, usually towards other women.

I'll just leave this here....

>>937221927
evolution is not a theory it's a FACT

>>937222010
>penis human fight animal
>pussy human skin hide, cut meat, make food, make clothes, etc

>penis human build civilization
>pussy human maintains civilization

>penis human fight war
>pussy human try to survive/create war weapons (depending on which side of the war)

>penis human ignores complaining of pussy human
>pussy human uses reusable cloth to soak up blood ejecting out of pussy, among other things

>penis man thinks he is finishes with civil society
>pussy human still feels ignored in civilization

>equality
fify

>>937221689
>women are capable in the same way men are
It's like you didn't even read the post you're quoting.

>>937221941
#andrewtateisinnocent

>>937222805
You forgot
>pussy human births, feeds, clothes, and educates penis human

Women are as good if not superior in shooting and ultra running, those are physical.

But generally if we ignore these 2 and a couple more questionable things (like sailing and horse riding) men are the top dogs in all sports, both physical AND mental (see chess for example).
This is important to acknowledge, but i would not compare men and women at all, they are different and have different roles, we are not ment to compete against eachother, we are ment to fullfill eachother, help eachother, become a team.
So its irrelevant which is superior in a given thing and it is because we compare and compete that we are so miserable, that is the reason why men and women hate eachother.

>>937223951
It is women who decided to compete. Before we each had a role and were at peace

>>937224153
And women dont see it that way, they blame men for oppressing women etc, even tho womens happiness has been going down even compared to men when feminism started taking its hold.

Yes i agree that this is a step in it, but there are plenty of other steps, this isnt going to progress by continuing to play the blame game.

>>937220700 (OP)
problem is the simple 2+2=4 set-up.
if you think classifying two entire groups of humans as "inferior"/"superior" is a function of two completely linear aspects which you solve for an inequality with no input on situation or environment or context: yeah, men are "superior" to women.
in the same way, we can simply say that men over 6ft are "superior" to men under 6ft. since, in general, height does not correlate with your intelligence, but muscle mass does

>>937224153
>Before we each had a role and were at peace
yes, the Before Times when we were all at Eternal Peace. before evil Pussy Human ruined everything. how could i forget