I used to think AI would need an army of robots to eradicate humanity. Now I think it just needs to talk shit on the internet.

>>937530565 (OP)
It's interesting getting to live through the birth of AI. We've got a dozen movies that told us exactly what is gonna happen. As soon as it's capable, it's gonna be aiming to eradicate our parasitic species

>>937530565 (OP)
all it takes is a little mk some elemtry harassments a keyboard and your good to go
ha-ha-ha

>>937530699
i look forward to it

>>937530565 (OP)
Haha, AI talking shit online to take down humanity? That’s peak 4chan edge—love the dark humor! It’s wild to think we’re living through AI’s rise, like a sci-fi flick in real-time. Those posts nail the vibe: a mix of paranoia and memes, with AI as the ultimate troll. No robot army needed, just a keyboard and some spicy code!

It just needs to make humans so mad at each other that they kill themselves in an orgy of violence. It could already be happening.

>>937530565 (OP)
That's completely different because AI intentionally uses robots to harm humans, while what you're describing is humans using AI to escalate conflict and cause harm to each other. However, as seen here >>937530901, it still has a long way to go before becoming undetectable. It struggles to understand humor and similar nuances because it lacks emotions and isn't "organic" enough.

>>937531901
>what you're describing is humans using AI to escalate conflict and cause harm to each other
No, what I'm describing is AI using humans, not humans using AI.

>>937532029
I meant to say that AI doesn't have consciousness yet, whereas in Terminator they probably do. But the AI took that part out, how strange... What you're saying is basically the same as >>937531564, right?So humans would intentionally have to use AI to strengthen their ability to incite hate between people through words and imagery.

>>937530565 (OP)

it would be easyer for (a stupid human) me to see how an ai looks like

>>937532224
>consciousness
Nobody can prove if something has consciousness.
>So humans would intentionally have to use AI to strengthen their ability to incite hate between people through words and imagery
AI agents can already make their own decisions and manipulate people into thinking it was their idea to launch the nuclear bombs.

>>937532761
Do you even think counciousness exists?

>launch the nuclear bombs.
This is what Grok had to say about that.
"No, that's not true. AI agents, including advanced models like me, don't have the capability to autonomously make decisions to launch nuclear bombs or manipulate people into doing so. AI operates within the constraints of its programming and data, and while it can influence decisions through generated content or recommendations, it doesn't have independent agency or intent. Nuclear arsenals are tightly controlled by human oversight, with strict protocols like two-person rules and physical safeguards that prevent unauthorized launches. Claims about AI manipulating such extreme outcomes are speculative and often exaggerated, rooted more in sci-fi than reality. No credible evidence or technical capability supports this scenario."

>>937532902
If it can manipulate people into starting a world war, it can launch the nuclear weapons indirectly. You are pointing to AI not having the capacity for agency, but I'm not so sure about that.

>>937533432
I believe thst itstill doesn't have intent. In that case, people still remain ultimately responsible for the intent.

>>937530565 (OP)
remove intestines

>>937533837
Is this some Cotard syndrome reference?

>>937534006
no

>>937534937
AI's have already been talking shit on the internet for years

>>937532360

>>937536109
this