>>937607394 (OP)This is a simple dependent probability problem. You have four cases:
1: HH
2: HT
3: TH
4: TT
The stipulation that at least one coin landed with heads showing eliminates case 4. The are three remaining cases, one of which is both showing heads.
>1/3
>>937607394 (OP)500 percent
or 1/3 if you flip both at once
or 2/3 if you observe
or maybe the beauty wakes up before all that
how knows
Cash value 69/420th of 1 cent.
>>937607394 (OP)In my experience, I'm quite smart but a little self-destructive
>>937607394 (OP)this is that gay balls in a box puzzle but at least it stipulates both coins are flipped at the same time instead of 1 at a time so it's actually 1/3rd instead of 50% like the other god damn bait image that everyone gives the wrong answer to because they're told that's the answer.
>>937607546Yeah but if one lands then we only need the other one so it's 50%
>>937610134It doesn't matter if they are flipped at the same time or not, retard. All that matters is that they are flipped.
>>937612780You are stupid.
>>937607394 (OP)There is no solution because 4 cannot be divided by 3.
>>937607394 (OP)The question is unclear.
If you have flipped one coin, and that coin is heads, then the possibilities for the other coin are:
Heads (50%), or
Tails (50%)
>>937607394 (OP)Logfag thread. You will literally had a meltdown yesterday when you got outed
>>937619388>The question is unclear.No it isn't. You're just a fucking idiot.
>>937619413>things that never happenedAll I remember is that someone called you an autistic spaz.
>>937619418The result of the previous coin flip does not affect the result of the next coin flip.
>>937621186No Shit, Sherlock. That's not what the question asks though, is it? Now try again.
>>937607394 (OP)Trick question.
They're both double-headed.
>>937619573>>937619442you made this thread fatass
you make basically any thread nobody wants here that get posted too often
and cringe as fuck
>>937622631Stop thinking about my ass, homo.
>>937607546>You have four cases:>1: HH>2: HT>3: TH>4: TTThat is correct when the question does NOT include a condition. The question asked includes a condition: one of the coins lands heads (and it doesn't matter which coin lands heads). So now the possibilities are:
1. HH
2. HT
3. TT
and (with one coin landing heads) we can eliminate possibility #3.
So the correct answer to the question is: 1/2 or 50%.
>>937622965>>937619388>50%.THAT'S WHAT I FUCKING SAID
>>937623946You have access to AI. There is no reason to show how dumb you are.
>>937607394 (OP)Anyone who says 50/50 is objectively stupid and incapable of abstract thought
>am me
>am scared of sand
>go to beach
>AAAAAAAAAAHHHH
>go to desert
>AAAAAAAAAAHHHHH
>take kid to play in sandbox
>AAAAAAAAAAHHHHH
sehgo
md5: 6ddf0b0e34f75f35d851e5f948deb592
๐
>>937607394 (OP)1/3 pic related. what people fail to realize is that even if you want to consider TH and HT the same thing, it's still more likely to occur than HH
>>937629269>if you want to consider TH and HT the same thing, it's still more likely to occur than HHHow are TH or HT more likely than HH?
>HH>TH/HTIn half of the situations you get HH, and for the other half you get TH/HT (assuming TT to be impossible).
>>937607394 (OP)50% it doesn't matter which one the first landed on.
>>937630186because theres more ways to get it. seriously grab two coins and try it yourself.
>>937630262>because theres more ways to get it.Oh. It kind of feels like "TH/HT" being considered the same would negate that, though; It seems like "more ways to get it" is just a restatement of there being both TH and HT (although I do believe that TH and HT don't just collapse into "HT/TH").
Theoretical probability and mathematics are not the same. Itโs like the every rectangle is a square but not every square is a rectangle thing. Mathematically itโs always 50/50 no matter what because each flip is independent so not based on the result of the other. Speaking in terms of probability, itโs less likely that out of two options the same result will happen twice in a row rather than just once. Probability has no definitive basis in reality. Probability canโt help determine the likelihood of any result at all. If you want to translate the probability to mathematics it would be 1/3 because factoring in the probability aspect, you are most likely to land heads, tails, heads. Mathematically the odds remain 50/50
>>937607394 (OP)From a physics standpoint, 50%. Bayesian statistics is bullshit.
>>937607394 (OP)The answer is kike. fuck your nigger Baal dollar and go kys.
>>937631898>From a physics standpoint, 50%.Fucking thank you.
I appreciate another quantum particle minded thinker here.
Science matters bitches.
>>937629049Like a real authist.greentexts himself in real time.
Hey is me being me, doing shit and being 14, mom's come in.png.
Fucking nigger..
>>937631839there's theoretical about it. the 1/3 answer can be demonstrated. see
>>937629269
>>937607394 (OP)Poorly worded question with multiple answers.
Hey there! I'm a 21-year-old girl living in the US, and I've got a playful side that loves to stir things up during late-night chats. I consider myself pretty adventurous, especially when it comes to teasing and pushing boundaries with guys online. I thrive on the thrill of seeing how far I can take things while having a blast! I usually prefer staying in due to some social anxiety, so this flirty world suits me just fine. If you're down for some fun and want to explore those spicy vibes together, hit me up! Add me on the app where we can dive into some steamy chats: c a mi l-o-x r-j-e (just make sure to remove the spaces and dashes)! Can't wait to connect and have some fun together!
>>937607394 (OP)first coin is 50/50, 2nd has an 80% chance of matching, 20% chance at being the alternate side.