Thread 938795335

He campaigned on it, after all

>>938795335 (OP)
Trump's AG, Pam Bondi said she had a document with "names and victims' names".
Then she didn't have it.
Then it never existed to begin with.

>>938795335 (OP)
Here's a question which never gets answered directly.
The dems knew they were fucked with biden so they switched to kamallamadingdong and every poll showed she was going to lose.
Why didn't the biden / the dems release the epstein list if it showed President Trump was really involved in all of the things happening on the island?

>>938795335 (OP)
can someone explain why MAGAs have their tits in a wringer over Cracker Barrel changing their logo?

>>938795559
They were sealed at the time.
but you already knew that

>>938795583
inbreeding leads to retardation

>>938795623
>They were sealed at the time.
Like I said, the question never gets an actual answer.
bidet could have unsealed them. With all of the stuff he didn't know about, his puppet masters could have unsealed them and he wouldn't even have known about it.

>>938795745
>bidet
12 yo cleverness detected
"autocorrect" in 3, 2, 1...

>>938795745
> legal certificate from trump u
lolll

>>938795813
>>938795855
Exactly. libs will never give an actual, direct answer because they know it will show that they are wrong.

>>938795335 (OP)

>"release the files!!"

carry on, 2026 is coming.

>>938795933
it's already been given, pedo defender

>>938796018
yep, blue wave imminent!

>>938796024
Nope, it has not been given. They could have been unsealed but for "some reason" bidumb and the dems didn't have them unsealed.

>>938796098
>bidumb
12 yo's idea of an argument
>why won't anybody take me seriously?

>>938795559
Defend, Deny, Deflect, Distance®

>>938795745
>>938796098

Being president does not mean "IHAVEULTIMAT POWER" you fucking pleb. They can't just suddenly decide, "Oh, I'm gonna go ahead and unseal this document and use it as substantiary evidence" without the proper litigation it would never hold up in court, you either do it the RIGHT WAY with due process, or in your case, the wrong way and then lose everything and all the people involved become immune to prosecution. Try using COMMON SENSE.

>>938795631
I thought maybe it was something of great socio-political import
Like when they boycotted Starbucks for not putting the word "christmas" on their holiday-themed cups.

>>938796622
>Defend, Deny, Deflect, Distance®
MAGAs are here ^

>>938795335 (OP)
>Why won't Trump do this?
Surely JD will follow through

>>938795559
>>938795745
>>938796098

Love how the dude so bent on "LiBs NeVeR gIvE a DiReCt AnSwEr" wont even respond, to an actual answer with legitimate points. Just goes to show that republicans really are the dumbest pieces of shit on the planet.

>>938795335 (OP)
Because all the blackmail in it would be exposed, and he'd lose his power over the members of congress and his cabinet.

>>938797010
I encourage every anon reading this to remember this post. Drill it into your brain. Reflect on it in ten years. If none of this came to pass, they were lying to you the whole time, and you know what party not to vote for from here on out.

>>938797475
HOW DARE YOU SAY CRACKER BARREL ISNT IMPORTANT THEY HAVE THE BEST GRAVY

>>938796494
As always, libtards will do whatever they can to avoid giving a direct answer.

>>938796622
As I said, the question never gets answered. That, of course, is because libs know they are wrong.

>>938797010
>Being president does not mean "IHAVEULTIMAT POWER"
That didn't stop biden from ignoring the constitution so why would he not release the list when it would have helped him or comma win?
>>938797793
>Love how the dude so bent on "LiBs NeVeR gIvE a DiReCt AnSwEr" wont even respond,
I'll respond when it is an actual answer.
biden and the dems had no respect for the law when they were in charge so the "they couldn't unseal them" line is bullshit and wrong.

>>938801154
you had a direct answer; you chose to ignore it

>>938801154
>That didn't stop biden from ignoring the constitution
examples? I'll wait.

>>938795335 (OP)
I think it's weird how all the SJW POCs are like "No mo Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben, Land o Lakes, dey be rayciss". But then they remove a cracker from Cracker Barrell and whites are like "Fuck you, bring back the Cracker".

>>938801154
the files were sealed when biden was president

and he respected the longstanding independence of the DOJ from the presidency

which Shitler of course doesn't


Also: you're a pedo defender. We all know it.

>>938801652
Covid/vaccination mandates
SAVE plan (student loans)
Religious student organization's rights
Faith-based contractor discrimination
Women's sports and trans
Race-based admissions
Supreme court reforms
Declaration of a 28th amendment
Raising the debt ceiling without congress

The list is rather long.

>>938802294
>he respected the longstanding independence of the DOJ
Dude didn't respect anyone or anything and tried to rule unilaterally. He was literally an authoritarian.

>>938802469
> if i accuse biden of what trump is doing right now, that'll get em

when you were a little kid, did you think you would grow up to be a chud who licks the boots of billionaires?

>>938802407
you said "ignoring the constitution"
zero examples of that
you're not worth my time

>>938802928
>what trump is doing right now
examples? I'll wait.

>>938803376
>you said
different anon
>zero examples of that
Yet there's a list. What else would you call those things?
>you're not worth my time
You got 13 more log threads to start before you miss quota?

>>938802928
>If you don't agree with me you must be on the other team
Actually, when I was a kid, I realized that government in general is against us. Odd how your defense of authoritarianism is personal attacks. Kinda fashie, bro.