Thread 941419493

There's no such thing as a "homosexual person". There are only people who engage in sodomy and people who don't. Don't call them "gay". They win if you do that. Prison gay and ex-gay are proof that "orientation" is fake. These are men who have sex with men (MSMs). Not gays.

>>941419493 (OP)
>Prison gay
I suspect that prison gay is often forced, not willing. It's like if you had to pick a household chore, and you always got the one that you hate, but you'll be kicked out if you don't do it. The difference is, of course, getting kicked out of prison would be better.

>>941419493 (OP)
Soooo effectively by definition homosexuality

>>941420085

Saying that having sodomy with other men is an "orientation". You might as well say having sex with blonde women is also an "orientation".

>>941419493 (OP)
24/7/365.25

>>941420851
>no use them words to describe thing
>use us words instead

>>941419493 (OP)
OP, a couple of questions:
1. Why do you care?
2. Are you a religious fundamentalist?

Who's in the mood for something thrilling tonight?
.....

>>941421654
click, hide post

>>941420983

>Anyone who doesn't worship niggers is a fascist Nazi Russian incel. It's not enough to be non-racist. You need to be anti-racist and oppose whiteness. Race is a social construct not a biological one. But only people with certain biological traits from certain lineages can have whiteness. I am very intelligent.

>>941421719
0/10

>>941420851
Homosexual acts are not "orientation.
Engaging in sodomy is engaging in homosexuality

ops pic makes me so dysphoric i could cry

>>941421705
Even better: report

>>941421719
>Goats are like mushrooms. If you shoot a duck, I'm afraid of toasters.

>>941419493 (OP)
> Prison gay and ex-gay are proof that "orientation" is fake.
This is like saying "you can get liver cancer by smoking therefore you can't naturally develop it as a non-smoker". Pants-on-head-retarded. Human biology, behaviour and attraction is extremely complex. It's not because one person can do something one way that this means all people can do it. It's also not because one way is possible, no other ways are possible.

There are some genes that affect aggression. You can either have those genes and be raised in a peaceful society - and you might still exhibit those traits or your upbringing might have caused those genes to be mostly repressed due to nothing triggering them. The same way you could have fewer genes associated with aggression, but if you're raised in a war-torn hellscape, you might become aggressive without having a genetic predisposition for aggression.

Your theory falls apart because you assume nature and nurture are mutually exclusive. They are not. At times they can eliminate each other, at times they can be a catalyst for each other and at times they have no effect on each other.