>>942480898
Hey, if you want to say that every feminist of the last 30 years aren't really true feminists, then I'm going to refer you back to this statement from earlier from me: >If feminists can't even follow and carry out the stated values of feminism themselves, how can anyone else?
All I've been pointing out is that the ideology of feminism has flaws that makes it debunkable, chief amongst them is how feminists can't and don't live the stated values and principles of feminism. Even under what you list as the core belief of third wave, they have already switched there from rights and freedoms into approaching wanting equity. They had all the rights, but they wanted parity, hence the so often repeated gender wage gap nonsense that they parroted for decades, knowing full well that it wasn't comparing job for job, but total earnings by every man versus total earnings by every woman.
Even at the very start of feminism, them fighting for the right for every women to vote wasn't an ask for equal rights, because not every man had the right to vote. In some places, it was only land owners that could vote (and women could be land owners), other's it required things like military duty or service like fire fighter and others, but everywhere the right to vote came with responsibilities. But the feminists wanted the right to vote without any of those responsibilities.
Much of what you seem to believe about feminism is a lie, and a contradiction of what it wants the public to think of it's ideological movement, it's stated values, versus it's actual actions and consequences. And those contradictions is what debunks it, just like the contradictions of any other ideology debunks those.
