How does /bant/ thinks will result the children of an unvaxed man and a vaxed wahmen ?

Could the vaxed woman sterilize the pureblood man?

Previous thread:

https://archived.moe/bant/thread/22857093/#22857097

>>22866396 (OP)

Top FDA official admits she refused the Covid-19 vaccine while pregnant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-izDaCMaKc&t=19s

https://xcancel.com/MaryanneDemasi/status/1925753668432720360#m

Her name is Sarah Brenner - she is a senior regulator at the FDA.

Twitter account:
https://xcancel.com/NanoHealthTeam
https://x.com/NanoHealthTeam

Reason she gave:
>"It was unknown at the time what the bio distribution patterns of the product is going to be. I was worried about the excretion in breast milk, that was my primary concern".

Despite that, she kept advising pregnant women to vaccinate themselves and didn't bring up this to other officials as a safety concern.

This is about women getting vaccinated WHILE pregnant.

>>22866630
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251353384

>>22866396 (OP)
Appreciating this thread

>>22866807

>>22866830
>Appreciating this thread
based fren, I intend on persisting unless banned, like at /pol/
>>22866886
Good information and testimonials fren.

>>22866807
>>22866630
what a cunt, women being sadistic, try to induce other people to kill or damage themselves, this one being an example of a feminine sadist. Masculine sadists are other variety of the same kind of psychological demonic monsters.

>>22866396 (OP)
fucking lucky little piece of fuck
gib me some booba to sucke too

>>22867501
>what a cunt, women being sadistic, try to induce other people to kill or damage themselves, this one being an example of a feminine sadist. Masculine sadists are other variety of the same kind of psychological demonic monsters.
Anyone who works in the FDA is morally and ethically compromised.

>>22868137
>Anyone who works in the FDA is morally and ethically compromised.
yes.
Any boards for more anons willing to engage in this topic anon?

>>22870620
I saw your thread on /pol/ hopefully the based anons are awake.

>>22870736
>I saw your thread on /pol/ hopefully the based anons are awake.
Thanks anon!
Noticed it!

>>22870736
Made another one at sci, same image, and text

>>22871954
Yeah, I saw it. /sci/ is weird, there's a bunch of shills there that have no argument and you call you a schizo virgin and a retard. There's also cool anons, but most of the anons are silent on the subject, can't figure out why, maybe they took and it gives them anxiety to talk about it and see all the evidence, I know I would be.

>>22872132
>Yeah, I saw it. /sci/ is weird, there's a bunch of shills there that have no argument and you call you a schizo virgin and a retard. There's also cool anons, but most of the anons are silent on the subject, can't figure out why, maybe they took and it gives them anxiety to talk about it and see all the evidence, I know I would be.
maybe, there is also a similar thread at
>>>/sci/16700749

>>22866396 (OP)
bump