you will never leave the solar system, and neither will your descendants, or any other humans for that matter.

>>22896136 (OP)
>you will never leave the solar system, and neither will your descendants, or any other humans for that matter.
what an arrogant thing to say

>>22896136 (OP)
And that's a good thing!

>>22896156
how come?

>>22896136 (OP)
yeah it's true

at this point, i think i have to straight up go to a university to talk about interesting shit
even then, i'm guessing it will be difficult

>>22896213
birds are interesting, you can join your local Audubon society

>>22896136 (OP)
Who gives a fuck about that when whites are going extinct, if whites go extinct hopefully the rest of humanity follows

>>22896257
>"""whites""" are going extinct
the world is healing..

>>22896257
>>22896263

>>22896257
>made it about race again award

>>22896136 (OP)
you say that, and it makes me laugh—I can't help but imagine you're thinking only of chemical rockets
are you aware of the concept of propulsion using external magnetic fields to provide angular momentum to mix spin-1 and spin-2 fields?
no reaction mass; asymmetric spacetime curvature waveriding via Gertsenshtein
you fire a highly coherent, collimated x-ray laser into a nested EM field, you get sympathetic resonant 'photogravitic' coupling between the spin-1 (EM) and spin-2 (gravitational), and you fall upwards without... actually moving at all
very little mechanical stress; no acceleration on the craft itself; beam steering via EM field modulation, not dissimilar at all to an old CRT
if you're not familiar:
>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212686423000213

crazy, right?

>>22896136 (OP)
I will, and I'll do without the high technology, too.

>>22897635
based
>>22897634
>you fire a highly coherent, collimated x-ray laser into a nested EM field, you get sympathetic resonant 'photogravitic' coupling between the spin-1 (EM) and spin-2 (gravitational), and you fall upwards without... actually moving at all
what the fuck does "upwards" mean when you're actually in space, nigga?
is this like the lorentz force where it's relative to the direction of current flow or something?
there is no upwards in space
what is "coherence" in the context of lasers/x-rays?
what is a "nested" EM field?

>>22897646
you take off from the ground; upwards relative to the ground
coherent spatially and temporally—respectively very nearly monochromatic, consistent across beam cross-section
nested as in multiple, spatially-overlapping field structures—deliberate spatial arrangement of field vectors coupling multiple confined modes, creating the field coupling channels, and so on
you have to literally build the interaction zone
a resonant cavity

I'm just being silly, it's not real

>>22897634
keep coping, chud.

>>22897754
nonmetallic room temperature superconductors were discovered in the late '70s—277K transition temp @ atmospheric pressure
the physics they teach in universities is deliberately wrong

We definitely could but governments hide tech advances unless it benefits them financially

>>22897594
Everything comes back to race because race is the most important thing

>>22897806
Where are these superconductors that operate at STP?

>>22898885
some kind of proprietary cholate composite, but mostly sodium cholanate based on the transition temp
vapour‐deposited ribbon—looks and feels like glossy white cassette tape

need belizean chocolate

>>22896136 (OP)
even at light speed it would take years to reach the nearest star to our own, so there would be little point in leaving anyway unless our technology is completely revolutionized to facilitate it
wormholes or summat