>>22903687>But you want him to begoneand that alone makes it disciplinarianism, even though the motivation isn't at all punitive?
no, I don't agree
>You have to revoke his human rights because he is evil, but he is human.and how does that contradict the motivation being humanistic? I would say it affirms it
if it's utilitarian and humanistic, but not liberal, wherein lies the contradiction?
please don't attempt to describe mine as a liberal ethic, and then point out the difference between my utilitarian humanism and liberalism as contradiction
I would explicitly deprive him of individual rights because I don't view him as fully human, and I want to protect humans from people like him—is that liberalism to you?
your initial impression was incorrect, and you should perhaps try to stop your bad habit of telling people what their views are