Our consciousness allows us to understand that we are in a reality in which there is no actual center, since everything is nothing but a monadic hypostasis of it's own being, essentially not even our own consciousness is us, our being and our consciousness are different things that connect, resulting to the projection that is portrayed to us in regards to reality. A reality without any actual center is basically related to equal level of ''relevance'' among everything, in other words, many parts that consist of a building or a block and other parts that consist of different buildings or blocks are actually equally relevant to one another, however the loop that is created from our consciousness (the same loop that stems from equal levels of pragmatic relevancy if we talk about the true nature of things) is converted to a projection which is conceptually understandable as ''different levels of relevancy'' in whatever we experience. So if we go by the same logic, we understand that the pragmatic state of affairs of reality regarding equal level of relevancy among everything and the conscious projections of it that is created by it regarding ''different levels of relevancy'' are actually equally relevant. If we understand that a projection which demonstrates different levels of relevancy and the true nature of things from which it originates which demonstrates equal levels of relevancy are equally relevant with one another, we can infer to what we understand as a precise representation of whatever exists. For instance, we will see different versions of the same mountain while knowing that all of them are equally relevant to the true nature of the mountain itself when we compare them to it's true nature, hence, seeing the same mountain from different angles or point of view will always provide us with an accurate and trustworthy description of it no matter what. The human consciousness can easily manipulate someone who does not manage to see through such inconsistencies.

The only exception to the rule is the concept of non-existence, as we talk about total irrelevancy, therefore, there is no difference between it's ''projection'' and it's true nature.

I will never effortpost again ok

Just post your ass already trannie

>>22904894
literally what are you talking about

>>22904970
libra mars

>>22904879
It's kind of a tough read. The structure just isn't good at all and the flow of thought is hard to follow. You should try using paragraphs to organize your thoughts better.

>>22904879
>Our consciousness allows us to understand that we are in a reality in which there is no actual center, since everything is nothing but a monadic hypostasis of it's own being, essentially not even our own consciousness is us, our being and our consciousness are different things that connect, resulting to the projection that is portrayed to us in regards to reality.

Lile this sentence has way too many fucking words in it.

>>22904992
I think this is better as a rewrite much easier to digest.
>Our consciousness allows us to understand that we are in a reality with no actual center. If everything is nothing but a monadic hypostasis of it's own being, then essentially our own consciousness isn't us. They are two different things that connect and reality is merely a projection resulting from the interaction between the two.

>>22904970
>Nipa ID

>>22904784 (OP)

>>22904784 (OP)
if we consider the mountain as flavour of expression of monadic hypostasis, or platonic form, or Spinozist modality of substance, how can we be sure that our idiosyncratic and implicitly-limited perception of 'mountainness' fully encapsulates the essence, if your multiangular mountain-qualia is empirical and subjective only?

>>22904784 (OP)
>TLDR; le reality
Yeah, but why the fuck does anything exist in the first place?