>>22918227faggots in suits are gonna vy for power and put shrapnel in civilians, what's the point?
this dude
>>22918218 didn't make any of those decisions and wasn't involved, even though he's getting mad about it
>>22918218>i was being facetious.>he thinks, he's claiming a moral highground here. and he's doing it by claiming dead men deserved it.i know what you meant
i'm saying if he doesn't have moral high ground, you shouldn't be mad
you shouldn't be mad even if he does
none of this gets anyone anyhwere