Thread 23458157

Take the grammar and linguistics pill.

General and Rational Grammar, Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot
https://annas-archive.org/md5/da0b9e2664b0be2dddc001c75c956810

Principles of General Grammar, A. J. Sylvestre de Sacy
https://books.google.com/books?id=sx0SAAAAIAAJ

linguistics

Introduction to Linguistics, MIT OpenCourseWare
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63BZGNOqrF2qf_yxOjuG35j

The Study of Language, George Yule
https://sharifling.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/the-study-of-language-george-yule.pdf

Latin

Familia Romana, Hans Ørberg
https://archive.org/details/familia-romana
https://archive.org/details/familia-romana-and-colloquia-personarum-audio-files

>>23458157 (OP)
you learn a language by speaking it, not by studying it
op is a faggot

>>23458158
I speak my cock into the cunt of your hot sister, Pawel.

>>23458158
You're thinking of vernacular/vulgar languages, which is what English, French etc were called up until the 1800s or so. Latin and Greek were referred to as "the learned languages".

>>23458161
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphosyntactic_alignment#Types_of_alignment

Transform LLMs prove you don't need to know anything about grammar to flawlessly translate complex ideas; you can pick it up as you use it.

>>23458163
*transformer

>>23458160
>>23458161
>>23458162
Nobody cares

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port-Royal_Grammar

The Port-Royal Grammar (originally Grammaire générale et raisonnée contenant les fondemens de l'art de parler, expliqués d'une manière claire et naturelle, "General and Rational Grammar, containing the fundamentals of the art of speaking, explained in a clear and natural manner") was a milestone in the analysis and philosophy of language. Published in 1660 by Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot, it was the linguistic counterpart to the Port-Royal Logic (1662), both named after the Jansenist monastery of Port-Royal-des-Champs where their authors worked. The Port-Royal Grammar became used as a standard textbook in the study of language until the early nineteenth century, and it has been reproduced in several editions and translations.


Principles of General Grammar, written by Antoine Isaac Silvestre De Sacy

Principles of General Grammar, written by Antoine Isaac Silvestre De Sacy in 1834, is a comprehensive guide to understanding the fundamental principles of grammar. The book is designed to be accessible to young readers and serves as an excellent introduction to the study of languages. De Sacy covers a wide range of topics, including the parts of speech, sentence structure, and syntax. He also delves into more complex concepts such as tense, mood, and voice. Throughout the book, De Sacy provides numerous examples and exercises to help readers fully grasp the concepts he presents.The author's writing style is clear and concise, making the material easy to understand. He also provides historical context for certain grammatical rules, giving readers a deeper understanding of the evolution of language.Overall, Principles of General Grammar is an essential resource for anyone looking to improve their understanding of grammar and language. Its clear explanations and practical examples make it an ideal guide for students and language learners alike.

>>23458163
>>23458165
Public school teachers hate thinking.

me fail english? thats unpossible.

>>23458167
There is literally no point (no pun in ten did) learning anything anymore. AI will do it. Don't even need to larn a langue bcus da ai ill du it

>>23458157 (OP)
Just do crosswords or something

>>23458168
These links are not about English. Forget English, it's not even a language.

>>23458157 (OP)
Language is just a tool for communication. Linguistics is a complete waste of time.

fusional vs agglutinative languages

https://youtu.be/4I6Wltk57SY

https://youtu.be/qxOJ4p8e7NQ&t=567

>>23458190
coombrain

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ENGLISH IN THE SO CALLED MIDEBEL DARK AGES AND NOW IS PUNCTUATION PUNCTUATION WAS NEVER PART OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HISTORICALLY INVOKING AMBIGUOUS MEANING AND LITERAL TERRORISM TO ANYONE WHO READS IT OTHER THAN THE INTENDED AUDIENCE

>>23458157 (OP)
Why English be like it be?

>>23458262
No, not having punctuation didn't mean the language was ambiguous. Old English was a rich, inflected language, it didn't need punctuation. Punctuation was invented after the language deteriorated and simplified into the poor mutilated thing it is now, as a crutch to try to compensate for its lack of actual grammar.

>>23458316
This thread is not about English