>>23544127
>Read my links
1st link is just retarded
Only statistic in that link was
>In 2016 (the latest year for which statistics are available), 142 women and girls were found guilty of attacks including rape, sexual assault, and sex with a minor.
im gonna assume this statistic was for usa since it doesn't mention shit, or maybe I missed it
>In 2016, there were an estimated over 57,300 children who were sexually abused in the United States. This figure encompasses various forms of sexual abuse, including rape.
>142 is about 0.25% of 57,300
2nd link
>the current meta-analysis found that a small proportion of sexual offenses reported to police are committed by females (fixed-effect meta-analytical average = 2.2%).
Ok 2.2%
>In contrast, victimization surveys indicated prevalence rates of female sexual offenders that were six times higher than official data (fixed-effect meta-analytical average = 11.6%)
Ok muh survey but sure 11.6%
Still not "prbably equal to the number of male pedos but that’s just my theory" like you said here
>>23542596
3rd link
>Experiences and Attitudes of Registered Female Sex
Offenders
Nigga fuck does this have to do with the argument? I don't wanna tap into the psyche of female pedos
4th link
>Experts on female sexual offenders say gender stereotypes can get in the way of problematic behaviour being detected and sometimes lead to the abuse not being taken as seriously
I agree, but at most legitimate no of female pedo sexual abusers will never be more than 20, maybe 25 percent, and I'm being generous. To say they are 'probably equal to the number of male pedos' is just fucking retarded
Even if we consider muh surveys and 'the actual number which wasn't reported due to social stigma' in favour of trying to increase the no of female pedos and don't consider any of it when the perpetrater is male in order to not increase the no of male pedos, YET female pedos will at most be 20% of all pedos.