Link was always a 50 year hold

>>60488957 (OP)
JUST 18,250 MORE "TONIGHT" POSTS MARINES

>>60488957 (OP)
idc I'll hold as long as the fud is here

>glad I never bought into this

>>60488957 (OP)
>>60488978
Link would've pumped into the top 3 years ago if it weren't for the suppression.

>>60488957 (OP)
That's hilariously dishonest and desperate. The WWW with browsing functionality was prototyped 1990 by Berners Lee, by the mid 90s most homes had some form of dial up internet and most retailers had a website. I remember pestering my dad in 1998 to look up game websites. Transformative tech is adopted readily, look at the use of LLMs.

Going back to ARPA net means you might as well give chainlink the exact same starting point given it's just a fundamental building block to the tech. In fact just go back to the discovery of electricity. Just three more milennia marines! Slowly then all at once! *sip*

>>60489158
>Transformative tech is adopted readily
Not by major institutions it isn't.

>>60489162
all major banks had their own web services set up by 1998
you're retarded

>>60489158
kek

>>60489309
….which means it took them almost 30 years from the introduction of arpanet

>>60489326
> www with browsing functionality was prototyped 1990 by Berners Lee
.. which means it took them 8 years, not 30

>>60489412
8 years from when the tech was actually ready for that type of adoption. Not far off from what’s happening with blockchain. If anything blockchain is an accelerated version

What if you hold Link for 50 years and then find out you were wrong? Should you try another coin?

>>60489309
>all major banks had their own web services set up by 1998
More like 5 years later in the early 2000s.
And the backends for this were still running Cobol (and still are to this day).

And if you want to pursue this analogy, look at Arpanet as blockchains (the foundational system), and HTTP as Chainlink (the application layer that makes the foundational system actually usable).

>>60489440
Of course, never give up

>>60489412
what would you say was the arpanet->www equivalent leap for blockchain?

maybe it hasn't happened yet?
institutions only got on board, reluctantly, once it became clear the public found value in the WWW

this time entrepreneurs are trying to front run organic use-cases and sell the institutions on dominating from the get-go.

the weirdest part in all of this is that usually, tech is being developed behind the scenes, used by government agencies, the military, and so on, and after a certain point they choose to release the most basic and watered down versions of those technologies to the public for commercial use
blockchains are quite the opposite, they aren't used by anyone after 16 years, truly remarkable when you think about it

>>60490166
Truly remarkable