>>60493767>>60493773If you have to move many people, whether that's a large family or multiple executives from your company etc, a business jet, Bombardier 7500 or Gulfstream at 80 million + USD purchase price can make sense.
If you want to jump on a fucking learjet with NETJETS lmfao for 250k a year you can have a few hours and that can make sense for you but that is NOT the same thing as getting the experience of first class long haul flights at all, that is small jumps at 40k feet to make fast trips within the USA or Europe or a few hours radius around those airports.
And no, for the cost of a small car you cannot sign up and take fractional ownership of literally any size plane in any fleet in the world. That's not how that works at all.
A Learjet or signature jet is a mid size jet that is fast and affordable to operate (100-200k per year without problems/overhaul), but you are not comfortable and you are severely limited in range.
Commercial aviation is safer. That's objectively true, but remember that there are a lot of different kinds of private owners and not all of them feel like doing hundreds of thousands of dollars of preventative maintenance or hiring teams that are dedicated because they are expensive.
Unless you have a large, international company and you move people around, or you have over 1 billion dollars in assets and you have a 5 person+ family moving with you for AT MINIMUM 300 hours flight time per year, you do not need a bombardier 7500 or Gulstream at 80million.
You need first class.
If you can't afford to buy a 12 million dollar learjet and operate it and use it for the majority of your air travel, that's fine. You can fly short flights commercially which to be honest sucks as an experience.
But if you can't afford to make a super long range jet work in your model and you need to do Los Angeles to Berlin or whatever, you fly first class for a tiny fraction of operating a plane.