Thread 60496259 - /biz/ [Archived: 1175 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: Elc3e1ud
6/12/2025, 8:07:01 PM No.60496259
1744338983770548
1744338983770548
md5: 064efdf4d75c2f19bfc103dd9bdf0c49🔍
>We're very heavily covering the US insitutions in addition to continuing to cover those in Asia and the Middle East. So I can't mention exact name because they wanna wait to announce, they have all those processes with NDAs and, you know, it's a very tightly controlled process. But, I would say between last year and this year we're in various stages of conversations with probably all the top institutions in those geographies.
>I think that those top institutions basically want to use the solution that solves all their problems, is used by the other top tier banks and players, has all the functionality they want, whether that's identity, data, connectivity orchestration... and there really is no system other than Chainlink that meets that high standard.
>The key challenge now is going to be making sure that the system can scalably meet all the demand of all the asset managers, banks, financial market infrastructures. And as it meets all of their individual demand, that it weaves them together to transact with each other over CCIP, orchestrated by CRE, using Chainlink data, utilizing Chainlink compliance systems and contracts and identity oracles. So, there's 2 challenges; servicing the demand we already have, and servicing it in a way where anyone who joins the Chainlink standard's way of doing capital market transactions enters a big network of the world's top institutions. And they can all be on different chains, different jurisdictions, and they can all have different compliance requirements, but they can transact with each other. You can be a SWISS bank like UBS and be able to transact with an Australian bank like ENZ using a tokenized fund from a US institution. And all of that can seamlessly flow across multiple chains, interacting with multiple pieces of data, complying with different regulatory regimes. That's what we're stitching together.
Replies: >>60496260 >>60496384
Anonymous ID: Elc3e1ud
6/12/2025, 8:07:23 PM No.60496260
>>60496259 (OP)
>And once you stitch that together - once you get that capital moving across these institutional participants, the next simple and obvious step is getting parts of that capital flow to move through the DeFI participants. That's when you get what we call the internet of contracts, where you basically have one interconnected web of financial products, financial service providers, banks, asset managers, all interoperating with each other on a single set of global standards for data, identity, connectivity, and orchestration. Chainlink data, Chainlink compliance, Chainlink CCIP, and CRE for orchestration.
>Really, we're the only ones who can make this work right now. And if the market and RWE adoption booms the way we think it will and institutional adoption booms the way we think it will, and Chainlink is the only way to do this for a year or two during that boom, then I genuinely think we will be able to gather the largest collection of institutions, with the most capital, transacting with each other on production. And therefore, the largest source of capital flowing through the DeFI ecosystem. That's the global standard we're building.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2GaNHxxxRs
Replies: >>60496301 >>60496384 >>60498981
Anonymous ID: AFzU7QT/
6/12/2025, 8:08:52 PM No.60496266
>CONVERSATIONS
AFTER 8 FUCKING YEARS
Replies: >>60502119
Anonymous ID: uv/P1mUc
6/12/2025, 8:15:57 PM No.60496294
>FARTS
Anonymous ID: 0Gc9Qi86
6/12/2025, 8:17:25 PM No.60496301
>>60496260.
>if the market and RWE adoption booms the way we think it will and institutional adoption booms the way we think it will
>and [if] Chainlink is the only way to do this for a year or two during that boom
>then I genuinely think we will be able to gather the largest collection of institutions, with the most capital, transacting with each other on product
Those are some big ifs. I wish he worded this more confidently.
Replies: >>60496356
Anonymous ID: Elc3e1ud
6/12/2025, 8:29:49 PM No.60496356
>>60496301
He's just humble. Being a bold braggart would be a bad look.
Anonymous ID: vO+0CfTw
6/12/2025, 8:36:39 PM No.60496384
soyjak
soyjak
md5: eb075775959c844e9e59e5ca57dd4148🔍
>>60496259 (OP)
>>60496260

>WOWZERS!!!!
Replies: >>60501916
Anonymous ID: Elc3e1ud
6/13/2025, 1:03:07 AM No.60497466
b
Anonymous ID: Um0FKGNd
6/13/2025, 9:01:16 AM No.60498934
The Middle East? Isn't Iran in the Middle East? Is Israel in the Middle East? Holy smokes Chainlink is being suppressed with nuclear warheads.
Anonymous ID: SxFOtHTi
6/13/2025, 9:25:37 AM No.60498981
>>60496260
>we're the only ones who can make this work right now.
>right now
>Chainlink is the only way to do this for a year or two
>year or two
Is somebody else making moves into their territory?
Replies: >>60498982 >>60498985
Anonymous ID: SxFOtHTi
6/13/2025, 9:26:41 AM No.60498982
>>60498981
My captcha said, "DAY44"
I wonder what it could mean.
Anonymous ID: UasBRi1o
6/13/2025, 9:28:41 AM No.60498985
>>60498981
Not really - he is saying that it would take at least 1-2 years for some other new player to get to production, and by then it would be too late because the fat man has already eaten all of the RWAs
Replies: >>60499183
Anonymous ID: 0Do7IqxX
6/13/2025, 11:12:50 AM No.60499183
>>60498985
>Quantitative Eating was a nod from Sergey to us
Anonymous ID: esGSG3on
6/13/2025, 11:58:27 PM No.60501916
1740449757894148
1740449757894148
md5: 64387c3379ca4055341cb6bed734320e🔍
>>60496384
Anonymous ID: GQe4XvkD
6/14/2025, 1:37:53 AM No.60502119
>>60496266
what have you accomplished in 8 years?