>haha i c pee
and
>omg 2021 price

Why do they never attack the ICP tech? I can’t think of one blockchain with better technology.

>>60496520 (OP)

>>60496520 (OP)
BTC is better

>>60496524
>Saar, I change wording in readme file 800 thousand times

Key baggy trying to convince himself keep hodling

>>60496542
There is nothing outside of BTC and possibly Monero. All crypto adjusts to Bitcoin. These are the shovels of the gold rush shovel sellers, but the only gold is BTC.

>>60496520 (OP)
icy pee runs on aws
it is not its own cloud.
this is why its going to 0

>>60496578
icp is the only one running fully on chain, ots competitor is aws so I don’t know why you’re lying.

>>60496578
Fucking lying pos, everyone knows icp is fully on chain. Where did you evencome up with this bullshit that icp runs on aws

>>60496520 (OP)
I see pee
LMAO

>>60496525
they serve different purposes.
but btw, icp is the best bitcoin layer 2. it allows you to actually use your btc.

I kinda wanna buy some ICP, should I? Or should I buy TAO instead? Convince me.

>>60496520 (OP)
>blockchain with better technology
you don't even have a blockchain, retarded monkey

>>60496701
>layer 2
you have 0 idea of what that means
lmao

>>60496520 (OP)
>better tech

in relation to what?
I would say it is way different and they are sorta been trying to re-invent the wheel.

Infra-wise, ethereum is way ahead of everything else.
Sentiment-wise, its BTC.
Degens use solana because its a fast way to play the shitcoin casino.

What ICP is for then? What actual problems does it even solve?

>>60496701
kys retard

>>60496746
you're right but I have to correct you in one thing:
solana is also not a blockchain

>>60496715
Make sure to pick up a 5k suicide stack. That's what the majority around here say, 5ksui / 50k make it stack.

>>60496746
Cybersecurity for one, web 2 businesses spent billions on web security. Unlike other chains, on ICP you can built websites and apps without limitations; it’s basically a web peovider. If it’s nothing special why is HBAR building on ICP?

>>60496736
>>60496751
not an argument. both of you are low IQ.

>>60497019
>not an argument
yes it is
the difference between a sidechain and a layer 2 is the ability to interact with the layer 2 from the base layer
this is IMPERATIVE for the escape hatch and fraud proofs

you have literally no fucking idea what you're talking about, you sound like a literal indian posting about "le technology" when you have no fucking clue of any crypto axioms

>>60497295
useless semantics, nobody cares about your personal ideology.

icp is even a layer zero for bitcoin. they interact at the protocol level.

like i said:
>it allows you to actually use your btc.

>>60497412
>icp is even a layer zero for bitcoin. they interact at the protocol level.
Protocol level is layer 4

>>60497427
huh? your traditional security models are not the same as modern blockchain.

if you are low IQ, i suggest talking to the AI widget on internetcomputer .org.
educate yourselves.

>>60496978
this; what i dont get is why every police department, intelligence agency, company etc isn't building on ICP to ensure not only secrecy - but autonomy. It will give them total autonomy over their web hosting and access - something not possible if your servers are hosted by Amazon or someone. If you're a law firm for example - and you're worried about your client info getting hacked, or journalists fishing around for information - just get it all on ICP instead.

>>60497412
>useless semantics
lmao
no escape hatch in case of sequencer/ proposer failure == not a layer 2

>layer zero
actual scam buzzword that don't mean anything

>>60497538
>i dont get is why every police department, intelligence agency, company etc isn't building on ICP

>>60496746
It solves the lambo problem

>>60496520 (OP)
you forgot "3 cents"

>>60496520 (OP)
KYCkold coin, complete antithesis of crypto. If you're not allowed to do anything controversial on it you may as well just use normal services and not deal with the downsides of crypto.

>>60498243
Run your CP site on the dark web, faggot

>>60496520 (OP)
centralized

>>60496520 (OP)
>Why do they never attack the ICP tech?
it's meaningless so most people forget it isn't a complete shitcoin with nothing to back up it's existence. years and years of muh tech and the price remains the same. why should anybody care about the product when the asset itself is not worth buying into?

anyway, off to buy moar npc. markets shat themselves and shit is cheap. icp is always cheap, though, so go ham :)

>>60496520 (OP)
>picking a name that dooms it
Why are retards like this?

>he bought something called 'Internet Computer'

>>60496520 (OP)
>99% down from it's ath
>unlimited supply
Good luck with that

>>60498202
for domenic, yes