There are still people shilling this token after 8 fucking years.

Take the L faggots

>>60503288 (OP)
You just made a shill thread, deleted it if you want fewer link threads

>>60503288 (OP)
The price action of this shit is both hilarious and terrifying. Why can't the cult see this ? They're getting poorer.

>>60503293
because they would rather double down rather than admit they got conned.

It's the same cult that believes Bitcoin whales and Bulgarians are suppressing Chainlink. They're retarded niggers

>>60503306
Kill your self wagie

>>60503319
gas yourself kike shill

>>60503319
uh oh....we got an angry Linkjeet here

SHO SHO GO AWAY!

>>60503306
>because they would rather double down
this
>price goes down
I buy
>price is crabbin'
I buy
>price goes up
I buy
We're more like tripling down

I have a week in New York coming up in November.
Recommendations? Already going to Ivan Ramen, have a ton of pizza/bagel places lined up, Met of course. Is the Comedy Cellar good?

>>60503293
I bought 1000 Link tokens at $5 and steaked them which has generated an additional 50 Link, so I actually made a profit of $8,755 roughly at current prices. Not bad.

>>60503349
You literally could have just bought Bitcoin (like all maxis say) and vastly outperformed that shitcoin.

but hey, atleast you're happy

>>60503353
But my Link is generating additional Link thus making it a productive asset as opposed to bitcoin which does nothing but sit in your wallet. I can’t grow my Bitcoin stack without further capital expenditures, but I can and am increasing my Link stack without further capital investment.

>>60503359
>generating additional Link
yeah because the team dumps on you retards lol

It's hilarious that people still don't grasp how "staking" is identical to "masternodes" in 2017. Fucking newfags

>>60503359
Based steak enjoyer playing the long game

>>60503353
Or you can just buy at $10 and sell at $28 like a normal human being

mostly holding since 2018. still not selling. I can wait. please continue with your daily fud session.

>>60503364
Thanks for being so concerned about my financial well being. I truly appreciate you anon. God bless you.

>>60503288 (OP)
doing the needful from your cubicle in hyderabad, vishal?

>>60503590
>>60503382
you're poor lol

>>60503288 (OP)
Kek, meanwhile you’re still holding bags waiting for a miracle.
>Some of us moved on to actual utility: like xMoney.
Pay for real-world shit (cars, bills, gov fees) and get cashback, no cope needed.

>>60503288 (OP)
>bought @ $0.50
>earning staking rewards
cope
seethe
dilate
not selling

>>60503590
>>4961777
>Why aren't LINK threads banned as well? I swear you shits have 5 threads about your worthless bags up every time
there it is guys, definitive proof that LINK niggers have been systematically spamming the shit out of this board for 7+ years, that pic encapsulates perfectly the backlash from OGs to their spam back then, before the shills overrun the place
thanks for posting this bro

>>60504078
>not selling at $50 for like 100 BTC and being worth 8 figures now

>>60503288 (OP)
L is the roman numeral for 50 so I think I'll actually take the C since thats the roman numeral for 100 and it's done 100x in the last 8 years

>>60503359
Did you know that staking is taxed as income?
good luck with that if you don't sell right when you get it
Same with the SxT rewards

>>60503288 (OP)
>Take the L faggots

>>60503635
Im not poor, I have 80k link and I am paid well at work, but I just dont quite have the wealth to give me the comfort level to do what I want. Im coming from having $3000 net worth and a used ford focus 10 years ago, I think Im doing just fine.

>>60504133
You're welcome.
FUDers arguments are weaker than their cat's asshole and seem to think bagholding makes you rich.

>>60504133
THIS CRYBABY IS AT IT AGAIN. EVERY SINGLE DAY HE'S IN HERE BITCHING AND MOANING ABOUT LINK THREADS. FIND SOME OTHER CORNER OF THE INTERNET TO HANG OUT AT, DUDE.

>>60503347
Minca is my favorite ramen spot in NYC. Ivan has more variety but Minca is superior if you’re only interested in the ramen. Toy Tokyo and Forbidden Planet are rad too if you're into figures and comics.

>>60503359
when "staking" was released, anons were smart enough to note that this wasn't the staking they were promised, just regular shitcoin staking so they could cross off the item on the list without actually delivering anything, again. the way it works is always the same: they dump more link from their stash on the market, driving the price of link down. then you get more link to compensate for that loss of value. it's just masturbatory shuffling of papers. the only saving grace is that the "staking" pool is limited, so link holders that are not in the pool are just getting dumped on without any compensation at all. it's frankly a bit disappointing that this is now getting called "staking" by link marines, they got tricked by chainlink marketing, again

>>60505981
Awesome, thanks anon. I'm staying right near there.

>>60505986
>slashless staking good for ETH (first three years), Solana, BNB, TRX, ADA, ...
>slashless staking BAD for chainlink

>dumping inflation good for BTC, ETH, XRP, SUI, Solana, ...
>dumping inflation BAD for chainlink

You have to be paid to be this retarded

>>60503288 (OP)
>Take the L faggots
Just let them be exit liquidity until it dies off completely, they're all so obnoxious and hysterical they actually (genuinely) and I rarely say this, they deserve to lose all their money just because of their histrionics and insufferable shitting up of X / biz with their low IQ interventions. They're all so emotionally attached and hysterical that they think every conversation is about them. They are the single worst thing to happen to crypto, worse than any rugpull.

>>60506107
who are you talking about?

>>60506063
>>slashless staking BAD for chainlink
Best part is Chainlink staking does have slashing

>>60505986
> i didn't stake my link
> can't find an empty slot
> boohooo

>>60506063
shitcoin staking mechanics are bad everywhere, anon. what makes it bad for chainlink is that they outlined a system where they would improve on the shitcoin staking status quo (that is bad), failed to do it, yet still pretend that they delivered "staking". apparently anons just lap it up though, so it was great business sense from them to not do the work after all i guess

>>60506063
t. paid shill
>>60506107
/thread

>>60506174
Pretty much every crypto promised "better" staking, and not a single one of them launched staking with all major functionalities running, retard.
ETH staking took three years for the first withdrawals (LOL) and two years to even merge, Solana STILL doesn't have slashing after five years, Cardano staking still doesn't have governance voting, etc. etc. etc.

>>60506176
>says “just let them be exit liquidity”
>doesn’t actually just let them, bothers them all the time
Can you explain?

>>60506176
>paid shill
Why are you here talking to paid shills?

>>60506207
you are making it sound like if others are doing a piss poor job, then a company of 500 people doing the same is somehow less bad? if chainlink is fine with being yet another shitcoin without proper management, why should anyone take their word that they will deliver on their other goals?

>>60506215
>you are making it sound like if others are doing a piss poor job, then a company of 500 people doing the same is somehow less bad?
If others do it, hardly anyone cares and it's all part of the development process.
If chainlink does it, they're "tricking people".

>company of 500 people
Every crypto I listed has about the same number of employees. Fuck you're stupid.

>>60506211
>>60506226
t. paid LINK trannie on suicide watch

If this coin had the market cap of XRP, I'd make it. Not BTC, not ETH, not some hypothetical mooning during an alt season. It just needs whatever value is propping up the number #4 shitcoin during an altcoin bear market.

>>60506377
Wanna know a really neat and foolproof trick for avoiding paid link trannies?

>>60506437
no thanks, I prefer watching you seethe as your shill tactics fail time after time

>>60506449
You're the one seething about paid shills though.

>>60506451
t. seething paid shill

reminder that there are still people that exist in the world that think hex and pulsechain are great projects

for some reason it seems to takes people like 20-30 years to change their mind and realize they were wrong about something, or maybe its just impossible idk

>>60506226
>Every crypto I listed has about the same number of employees
yes, and they are doing a terrible job. we can agree that 500 people is more than enough to implement a feature in a timely manner, yes? chainlink prides itself in being on the forefront of technology. that's the standard they set for themselves to be measured against. and they are doing a shit job of it. the rest of the class not handing in their homework won't excuse you for doing the same. especially when you bragged about being a model student before

>>60506843
>chainlink prides itself in being on the forefront of technology.
>that's the standard they set for themselves to be measured against.
Are you retarded? Every crypto does this.
Cardano says on their website that they "changed science".

You're obviously totally consumed with Link and are completely oblivious to crypto as a whole. It's bizarre to watch.

fuck stinks
hate 'em all

>>60506856
>Every crypto does this
so if nothing sets chainlink apart from everyone else, why buy their token then? if they can't be trusted to deliver the things they set out to do, might as well buy the competition or nothing at all

>>60507001
>if nothing sets chainlink apart from everyone else
oof, now look at Chainlink's actual adoption and compare with Cardano.

>>60507005
>actual adoption
IS THIS A JOKE?
WHERE IS THE INSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION THAT WE HAVE BEEN HEARING ABOUT FOR 8 FUCKING YEARS NOW?
NO, NOT
>PILOTS
>TESTS
>EXPERIMENTS
>CASE STUDIES
>DEMOS
FUCKING REAL ADOPTION
GRAVEL COIN AND LADY LUCK INTEGRATIONS DONT COUNT, BROTHER

>>60507011
if i understand correctly, it's not bad that chainlink has no institutional adoption, because everyone else also doesn't have it

>>60507011
I wasn't talking about institutional adoption, crypto in general doesn't have institutional adoption yet.

>>60503288 (OP)
im new to crypto, i bought link at 12 dollars anf the only reason is because i saw nonstop threads of it on this site.... i come from /fit/ btw i know the attention it gets must mean its juicy.

so what i'm getting here is that you bought this thing, it's going poorly and you get angry when asked about why you still cling to it. i mean, every investor has to start somewhere, i hope you can gain the self reflection necessary to overcome this

>>60503288 (OP)
SHUT UPSHUT UP If you’re wondering where the recent FUD is coming from it’s because we’re only months away from the release of the CyberCode 2.0 testnet. As an insider, you have no idea what the importance of CbC 2.0 is going to be for LINK when the alpha releases around the end of November (give or take a few months) so I will spoonfeed you out of kindness of heart:

CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x of the legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2026 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear sequencing (SLSeq) which Sergey said is very close to the finish line. This is all dynamically incentivized through semi-permeable staking (SPS) allowing LINK token holders to benefit for verifying data both on the main chain and the Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2026 layer. No other project is even close to doing this in the oracle space rn. It’s not even close!

The obvious benefits of super fast transaction speeds (obSFTS) also brings exponential economies of scale. What this means is if farmer has 50 Kg pig for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to the CyberCode 2.0 feature. A truly unique proposition! Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind. So get your ducks in a row. Just keep buying and NEVER sell. We are all in this together LINKbloodbros.

Scammer motherfuckers want you to think that banks and other organizations are not currently fulling their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. DON’T NOT LET THEM WIN! If you hold 50 or more LINK right now, you already made it. Immediately when we breach the $17 resistance it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned. So go buy many LINK for you dream to come true.

>>60507047
oh sweet summer child, the most egregious scams(link, xrp, ada) have billion dollar marketing warchests to pay thirdies to shill it nonstop. sorry you fell for it, better luck next time

>>60507011
At least in the United States, the minimum viable ecosystem (MVE) of institutional adoption cannot occur until the GENIUS Act is signed into law.

>>60504168
>bitcoin maxi appeals to taxes

>>60503306
They need medical attention

fuck you asshole we are gonna win

>>60509145
Suck my dick ripple is far superior

>>60503288 (OP)
checked.

never buying. never selling. deal with it.

>>60508647
I mean if you ever intend to sell and "make it" you might want to not be subject to an IRS audit
Unless you really think nobody is going to notice a NEET deposit a few million dollars into his account one day
Or are you delusional enough to think that businesses are going to accept payment in Link one day?

>>60511086
>are you delusional enough to think that businesses are going to accept payment in Link one day?
kek it's funny imagining that someone whose job is fudding Link would pretend to not know anything about how it works.
Only popped in for the lols. back tomorrow. tc guys x

>>60507096
WHAT THE FUCK AM I READING HERE. SO AM I TO ASSUME CHAINLINK WAS WORKING FROM 2017-2024 ON SIMPLY A WING AND A PRAYER THAT IN 2025 A BILL WOULD BE INTRODUCED THAT WILL FINALLY LET ME GAIN SOME SORT OF ADOPTION? GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU DISINGENUOUS LITTLE TWERP

>>60511248
Its a scam

>>60503288 (OP)
>3

trust sergey
trust the plan

>>60513333
checked and kek'd

>>60513333
check'd
it's over for jeetlink

>>60513335
Check deez you pathetic faggot fuck you and your Russian scam . Google it

>>60513333
Checked quads

You losers need to stop promoting this scam