Thoughts on Elon being a nano-maxi (XNO) in private?

There's even an "Elon" wallet in the top 13 nano (XNO) holders, bro is not being subtle about his bags!

>>60503367
Can't be arsed to trace it. Did he boughted in 21? That would be a comfortable -89% ROI adjusted for inflation.

>>60503367
Fake and gay

>>60503387
Looks like that yeah. Around the same time Tesla stopped accepting bitcoin due to environmental concerns

>>60503401
idk see OP post, he is practically screaming "BUY NANO" without actually naming the ticker. Every AI agrees

>>60503360 (OP)
>>60503367
go back, St0uty

>>60503430
this is my home

>>60503409
Maybe he should drop the name now. But maybe he forgot about it, it was just a few million.

>>60503532
Nano is the only crypto that can actually challenge the fiat hedgemony, given how it's somehow the best in slot across all 3 key categories (speed, feeless, fair distribution). Starting a serious conversation about side-stepping fiat requires careful timing I would imagine, not just thrown out in a few throwaway tweets as he's done in the past for doge or whatever. Trust the plan patriots

>>60503360 (OP)
Ask any LLM and it will give a different answer. Ask the same LLM later and it will give a different answer. Change one word in what OP added to the prompt and it will give a different answer. This is absolutely cringe desperation on a dead multi-exit scam.

>>60503360 (OP)
Also wasn't this before the team told everyone to leave theirs on exchange while the exchange went bankrupt and the team exit-scammed after the network catastrophically failed?

>>60504292
This is true but the fact that it finds nano a high % of the time is telling. And if you were to prod it with a nano prompt it will then confirm nano as the best option, even if you then try to prod it to another coin. The point of the LLM is to highlight what is already obvious: nano is clearly the best peer to peer money (and fits Elon's description perfectly)

>>60504295
oh you're the nexa schizo lol

>>60504421
No I hold zero Nexa and do not even know what it is. I am literally just reporting unequicocal fact of what happened and killed the project and led to everyone abandoning. The fact an LLM gave you a result means literally nothing. I can ask the same llm about a token's prospect and get 100x different valuation prospect for the same token. It means nothing.

>>60504483
Oh so the facts are the team scammed everyone after the network failed?

Why was the exchange owner found to be at fault in a court of law then?

As for the LLM, it's a moot point. Everyone knows nano is both:

a) the fastest coin
b) the only coin that is feeless

the AI is there just to sanity check the doubters

Crazy how he didn't respond after I owned him with facts and logic

>>60504529
It's fee-less because no one uses it.
Thus, no fees.

>>60506592
Was that supposed to be clever?

>>60503360 (OP)
>Thoughts on Elon
as little as possible.

Posting in a ebic nano bread
$100 eoy

>>60507080
few understand

my thought is that you should buy an ad

>>60507874
>This board is for the discussion of topics related to business, economics, financial markets, securities, currencies (including cryptocurrencies)
>NOOO DON'T DISCUSS THE ONLY VIABLE CRYPTOCURRENCY!!!!11!

>>60503409
>idk see OP post, he is practically screaming "BUY NANO" without actually naming the ticker.

Fake and gay

>>60503360 (OP)
This retard sold his Tesla BTC bags at sub 30k… don’t take his advice on crypto

>>60507607

>>60508571
low reading comprehension