me
md5: d414d16d11c7853dfcb98f89ae8ab889
🔍
I sold my coins, created a linkedin, followed titans of the industry, and am now going over my CV with Claude AI. What have you done to better yourself lately?
>>60522253 (OP)How do you think will waging go when AI doesn't do 20 steps, but can do 5000 in a sequence?
Who will still need IT people by then?
>>60522259I'm not in IT, I was a business major in college. I'll be looking for management and marketing jobs.
I've hidden this thread as a start!
I've been reading F.A Hayek's book on the perils of socialism. I reached a chapter where he was discussing liberty and safety, claiming that if you were to give up your liberty in favor of safety, that it could potentially be something negative. At first, I didn't really understand what he meant by safety, later on, I realized that he was referring to concepts such as social security, rather than safety in its broader definition. He used Benjamin Franklin's quote that said something along the lines of ''if someone gives up liberty for safety, he deserves neither liberty nor safety''. I was confused at first as to what it meant, so I talked to Grok about it and got it cleared up. It seemed as though even Grok wasn't very much able to explain exactly what he meant, though. I had to go back and forth between referring to the context of the book, the adaptation of the quote to suit something contemporary, and even had to remind Grok that it was a book about politics and economy, so if you were to mention ''safety'' as something broad, such as safety against physical harm, that the quote would not even as much as have been brought up in the context of the book. It took a while but eventually Grok agreed with me and apparently the conclusion I eventually came to after reading that chapter was not incorrect. It felt pretty good to have read that chapter at first and not understanding it, only to a few days later of thinking about it, having it make sense. And not just understanding it, but even as much as having Grok agree with the fact that given the context, that it was indeed referring to the concept of accepting a type of social stability or income, over liberty. So, yeah, I've been reading some stuff, I guess.
>>60522253 (OP)I'm working today even though it's a holiday because I like my job.
>>60522279AI applies itself. Using people would be less profitable.
>>60522253 (OP)In this climate trying to get a conventional career means you're either never gonna get a job or you're gonna get fucked.
Gambling is the way to go.
>>60522253 (OP)i informed anons about common tactics crypto companies use to trick inexperienced retail investors into giving them their money without them getting anything tangible in return. case study was chainlink labs
>>60522253 (OP)>>60522261So go for personal marketing, where people do not accept bots.
>>60522253 (OP)You sold your bags for LinkedIn likes. I bought A47 early and watched it print.
One of us is coping, the other is stacking. Guess who’s who.
>>60522253 (OP)I decided to sell my link and avax once and for all (at a loss obviously, i know i will never break even on neither of them so who cares) a few days ago and used all that money to invest in blockchain+ai slop. CMD, TAO and ICP to be exact, looking for more. Good timing, now that everyone thinks the world is going to end because of (((current events))), all three had great entry windows. I also stopped jerking off three times a day, down to only one time a day for about a month now.
>>60522259NEETs like you are insufferable lmao