if Link as a token will be "super valuable" in the future why did ChainlinkLabs and Sergey dump 300 million tokens between $10-$20 over the past years? This is the question shills can't answer

>>60566228 (OP)
damn looks like you found a killshot

and I was about to write you off but then I saw the selfie you attached

>>60566228 (OP)
Ill ask a reverse question. If other companies are willing to dump millions into poaching their audience base by paying them to use it. Why would anyone use CLL if they can get paid to use something else?

>CLL dumps millions to bootstrap developers
>JUMP directly pays securitize a strategic investment so they will use wormhole

If CLL didnt bootstrap then the project would be ultimately dead. It isnt fair but if other companies will poach developers then CLL has to atleast be willing to subsidize it for the near future

>>60566239
10 more years of bootstrapping, hodl the line

It cant be decentralised if chainlinklabs hold all the coins. Tokens need to spread. Too bad for every mouthbreather out there, 10K wallets and up keep collecting them tokens of the streets...

>>60566243
Its an ugly scenario but if JUMP is willing to offload MILLIONS into atleast being a detriment to LINK then they atleast have to offer something to be attractive. Its exactly what meta does to have OpenAIs developers to switch

>>60566249
but you're poor while Sergey is super rich, so your argument is invalid

bump

>>60566254
Sergey has been rich long before Chainlink