Did you know that most of fly over rural United States, which are extremely conservative and vote Republican, are almost entirely subsidized by the coastal elite Dem cities?
Pic related.

>>60567794 (OP)
Kek yeah. And they claim they pay for welfare

>>60567794 (OP)
that's funny because it's the opposite in Canada.
Parking lots and all that grass between city buildings doesn't produce anything, just costs money
in rural, almost every square foot is field or rangeland, or has oil underneath it, has timber, or water.

>>60567800
Land value doesn't equal economic output. Even in Canada, the cities produce the overwhelming majority of economic output and contribute much more to the fiscal health of the country

>>60567796
Most coastal cities have gdp's that rival European nations. It's unreal to hear people talk about economics or welfare state when they live in a state that literally owes their 21st century amenities to welfare.

Why would I thank them for feeding niggers and white trash? Haven't they read the signs, don't feed the animals.

>>60567804
And yet it does, I wasn't talking about land value I was talking about GDP per capital

>>60567794 (OP)
This meme gets you denied entry and deported if border control sees it in America.

Do not criticise their supreme leaders.

Yawwwwwwwnnnn

do anything about all of those rampaging niggers and spics yet? didn't think so, enjoy decline!

>>60567806
>Most coastal cities have gdp's that rival European nations
How do they do that when they eat food produced elsewhere? They are not self-sustainable.

>>60568030
Its not sustainable but they've been like this for millenia. Do you think the farmers in rural Italy weren't sustained to some degree by the massive infrastructure, tax money, and resources of rome?

>>60568219

You're looking at it the wrong way. Cities exist because of the surrounding land, the land doesn't exist due to the city. Cities historically began as focal points where all of the farmers, tradesmen, merchants from the surrounding land gathered to conduct commerce, it's a simple meeting place. It doesn't produce by nature, but as a function. Which is why it's retarded to claim "cities are more productive", this is just where money exchanges hands. They need the resources and products of the surrounding land to do anything whatsoever. Coastal cities are particularly advantaged because they are the point where products flow in and out from the rest of the world as well, into the rest of the country. If the rest of the country didn't exist that demand would plummet and the "big GDP" would be nil.

>>60568219
>>60568233

And rest assured, all of the ghetto rats and dependent retards who cluster around cities with their hats and hands out aren't the ones "producing GDP", it's businessmen up in the towers (that they hate)

>>60567794 (OP)
>Did you know that most of fly over rural United States, which are extremely conservative and vote Republican, are almost entirely subsidized by the coastal elite Dem cities?
Ok
Lets make a deal, all dem cities keep all their wealth and money and all "flyover" states keep their products and the money they make.
Amerifats can live without food for a while from their reserves but the famine would be eventually be extreme.

>>60568219
>Its not sustainable but they've been like this for millenia
So some jew cities just move money and product from one ledger to another ledger while everyone else works and claim they are the most productive region of the world?

>>60568401
the census bureau definition of urban vs rural is bizarre. pic related is USDA but i believe both 'nonmetro' correlate with census 'rural.' i grew up in a 'rural' non-metro micro area and live in the exurbs (1 hour from philly) 'urban' metro area. there is much, much, much more economic activity in the urban metro area. not just jewish finance nonsense but real-world stuff like manufacturing: medical devices, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, electronic devices, etc.

>>60568421

The transition from city to country is a spectrum, in between there is a "metro" that is mostly suburbs and towns and the industries you mention. The idea that the money exchanged in the city center is produced out of the ether is what is ridiculous, it's clearly just the nexus of the surrounding economic orbit.

>>60568219
Wrong way to look at it. Most tax money gets invested to the cities by government jobs. Cities always get substained by the land around

>>60568445
>Most tax money gets invested to the cities by government jobs
fucking rural retard cope. It's not about "MOST" or the absolute value, it's about economic efficiency. Per dollar in, how many do you get out? The cities have always subsidized suburbs and rural areas. It's literally the entire point of cities. Large groups of people living close together, combining resources: public services, etc. vs rural or suburbanites, who do the opposite. Governments invest in cities instead of your potato farm because that's where the growth is.
>>60568233
holy mega cope

Cities produce everything that actually makes America worth shit. The computers that you're typing on, the phones in your pocket, the cars that you drive, the medicine that you depend on, the doctors that you visit, the movies that you watch, the music that you listen to, the infrastructure that you drive on, work, and live in.

Any country can produce corn, but not every country can produce tier 1 research institutions that create the next generation of scientists, engineers, medical personnel, economists, military experts, that keep the United States as the world's preeminent economic, technological, and military power.

>>60568657

Everything you just mentioned is produced with resources that are extracted from the surrounding land, in factories outside of the city. How fucking stupid are you? Cities are for office buildings and businessmen to trade things extracted/manufactured elsewhere. You aren't a part of that, you're just a little lefty nigger who can't survive anywhere else. The hilarious thing about cities is that most people who live in cities hate the actual people who make cities run, the businessmen.

oh look its this grossly wrong propaganda thread. again. spend 5 seconds on chat gpt and you'll see generally blue states take red states make.

we can go much further in depth but charging 5x and then taxing things at 70% to say "look we contribute!!!" isn't a valid measurement.

blue states: tax the rich! tax them MORE. for the homeless and hungry!!! MORE
red states: don't have homeless and hungry, they understand basic economics.

>>60568776

>>60568386
Youre confusing big agriculture with small time home steading. The economic trade off between rural farmers and cities is far beyond the scope of your chicken raising hobby.
And besides, how do you expect to get modern farming equipment to farm t scale without the infrastructure, resources, and technology produced in cities? A central piece of your irrigation system breaks and you're gonna what, manufactur it yourself? With what machines? Produced from where? You're going to go back to pick and shovel without cities supporting you. That's not enough to sustain the entirety of the rural communities. Sure, it's enough to feed you and your family, but not everyone can do that or will do that.

Niggers

>>60568836
Grok what states do most black welfare recipients live?

>>60568981
(retard who is 12 missed paychecks away from being on equal footing with a nigger welfare recipient.)

>>60567794 (OP)
>blue cities can't feed their own people
>demand the government conjure out of thin air to buy food and raw materials produced in red counties
>this somehow counts as "subsidizing" them
yep, makes sense to me

>>60567794 (OP)
yes

>>60567794 (OP)
Holy fuck you are retarded.

>>60567794 (OP)
>subsidized
they force em sell food for cheap, then "subsidize" is see they stop grow corn