>>60572517bruh you can not be a serious player and think XRP deserves to be anywhere near its current mcap, let alone above LINK in any way. XRP still does nothing, literally nothing with no adoption and is not meaningful in any way to the crypto industry or otherwise. The only chance they have at any meaningful activity at this point is their stablecoin, and it's both a long shot AND requires LINK. So really, why is it the #3 crypto?
LINK has tons of real adoption today, in use, with the token being used every day for thousands of transactions. It has major partnerships that have moved to production with the largest companies in crypto as well as now tradfi such as JP Morgan Kinexys. It is being indicated as core infrastructure in IBM patents, SWIFT and DTCC tech, and much more.
XRP hasn't had even a hint of adoption for several years now, and all those things disappeared into thin air and never came to fruition.
What crack do you need to be smoking to not agree with the simple concept that LINK should be worth more than XRP? Even if you think LINK is woefully overvalued, it still deserves to be probably thousands of times higher in value than XRP given the current state of things.
On top of all this, if XRP ever does anything it will fully require Chainlink, as all L1s do, because all current infrastructure is being built around interoperability and oracles neither of which XRP can handle appropriately.