>>60576408 (OP)
tries to keep it tacticool.

Somebody, show him hitman's raven 'suit'

>>60576408 (OP)
Obviously no, and im not even invested. If he walked into a business meeting with that people would look crossed eyed at him. But hes in a war so he can wear whatever he wants.

>>60576419
this goy suits

>>60576417
Your pic is 100% not a suit, only an incel would think so.

>>60576419
>he doesnt know about the eastern zhongshan suit

>>60576472
The point is if its even slightly ambiguous whales will win. No the plebs wont take them down, they'll screech and moan for about a week until more and more people lose energy and finally they move on. Good luck tho.

>>60576477
Meh, the more i look at the design the more i can see how its a modern take on the western suit. Maybe if he tucked in his shirt it would be more obvious but the cuffs and the collar are very similar.

Its more of an eastern design if anything

>>60576457
Lmao. True.

>>60576408 (OP)
Yes, it's evidently a suit. There are a few details people might might quibble over, but I would refute all of those:

>four buttons
Has been used on suits in the past, particularly things like Mod suits in the 1960s. It creates a very high meeting point for the lapels, but that in itself isn't that uncommon. It's not a full collar coming all the way up to the neck.
>big patch pockets
Not typical on a business suit, but more common on tweed and hunting jackets, and women's suits, funnily enough.
>unstructured shape, no canvas or shoulder padding
Completely normal, especially on Neapolitan suits. I've got one like this myself.

Overall the changes lean much more towards an informal look, but it's still fundamentally a suit. People are probably trying to argue that it would only qualify as a suit if he were wearing a shirt and tie, plus a shiny pair of formal shoes, but those are accessories. You can wear a suit with a t-shirt and trainers and it would still be a suit. The jacket and trousers match, it has lapels, what more is there to argue over?

>>60576497
>words words words

youre trying really hard to reason why its a suit, i wonder why. surely not because theres a 100x at stake, surely not...if you saw someone wearing that in your day to day you'd say wtf is that goofy outfit but since you stand to gain some shekels suddenly its a suit lol.

>>60576505
someones worried their about to lose their entire stack chasing a 1% gain

>>60576505
bro, it's because everybody knows the man

>>60576505
Because I have a passing interest in suits and that thing is obviously, unarguably a suit. If he was wearing a white shirt and a tie then nobody would even try to say otherwise. I'm guessing you think this guy isn't wearing a suit either?

I wouldn't try to place bets on a fucking market where the people you're betting against can just decide that you've lost regardless of any evidence to the contrary though, that's retarded.

>>60576505
>>60576520
Or this woman?

>>60576507
Thats the kicker, im not invested. I just love the corn fields that are stemming from this situation.

>>60576505
it's a suit and your a spineless honor less cuck, you can't take your money with you into the next life but you do take your honor that which is severely lacking in the 90% of the human race

>>60576505
>>60576520
>>60576525
Even this horror show qualifies as a suit.

Its not a fucking suit is it.

>>60576520
>im suddenly and expert in suits

cant make this shit up. you got an interest in shekels and you got baited

>>60576505
>>60576520
>>60576525
>>60576534
This, however, is not a suit because the jacket and trousers don't match. That's basically the only rule (unless we're talking about a morning suit, but that's kind of the exception).

>>60576538
No financial interest, I'm just irritated by people trying to argue that the sky is green.

>>60576551
>No financial interest

Yes youre pretty much ghandi, just a pure interest in suits. Who do you think youre kidding? This is why self awareness needs to be thought im schools.

Why doesn't he just bet on himself

>>60576562
because he is a mossad asset and doesn't decide shit for himself, including when he will partake in suit diplomacy

>>60576532
Do i need to repeat that im not invested? I dont need a 1% gain thats for actual rich whales to scalp you guys.

>>60576408 (OP)
this whole drama is engineered to get normies introduced to the concepts of decentralized truth and the need for specificity when dealing with oracles

tldr Zelensky wearing a suit is bullish for chainlink

>>60576408 (OP)
Suit or no suit, you can't polish a turd

>>60576419
>>60576497
>The jacket and trousers match, it has lapels, what more is there to argue over

Yeah I think you win. If something is
1. Jacket
2. Pants
3. Jacket has lapels
4. Jacket and pants are part of the same set (not merely matching but actually the same material)

It's absolutely a suit. Additional requirements would push this to beyond a suit (eg. Wearing semiformal, formal attire)

>>60576598
>Its a suit guys, the whales betting on no are just retarded and giving away money, if it goes south we'll call the police on a DECENTRALIZED platform.

Step away from the glimmering 100x and assess the situation objectively. but in reality i'll enjoy the cinema of crying plebs.

>>60576598
Only other thing I can think of is jacket length, which has to be somewhere around the backside. It can be a bit higher, or a bit lower, but if it starts to get halfway down the back of the thighs then it's becoming more of an overcoat. I guess there are things like tailcoats which kind of break this rule, but they're in their own sort of special category.

>>60576408 (OP)
Designer himself has confirmed it's a suite

Dropped some 10 bucks into this nothing more nothing less.

>>60576497
What a fucking fag.

>>60576532
Is this related to cow shit religion or something?

>>60576611
>call the permissionless police

>>60576408 (OP)
I can see the anger but making a bet with unclear definitions is the problem.

>>60576408 (OP)
>dress shirt (but with band collar instead of classic collar)
>blazer with notched lapels (that looks more like a regular jacket)
It doesn't look like a standard suit but it has all the components t bh.

>>60576551
back to /fa/ with you!

>>60576630
even zelenskyy himself confirmed it was a suit in an interview.

Its a shirt with a jacket

>>60576580
This is just schitzo enough to believe you

>>60576408 (OP)
what kind of a jeet platform is this?
whales have voting power they can abuse to avoid losing bets? why would anyone ever bet there

>>60578673
Its just a 100 iq degen filter. They see a shiny 100x they ape, rationalize later.

Why does it being a suit or not matter?

>>60576408 (OP)
>Not a suit chuds.

>>60578901

>>60578715
because there's 3 mil on the line

>>60578955
I think it's a suit. It looks like a new age suit.
He's wearing a blazer, button up and tie. New fashion.

>>60578688
Ok, you made me pussy out but I swear to God if this bullshit resolve Yes I will fucking track you down and make some venezuelan niggers rape you.

Kleros fixes this

TOTAL SUIT VICTORY

YESbros how are we holding up? Another 3 days before the outcome.

>>60576408 (OP)
Is it really still 100X gains? Man maybe I should take what is left of my gay crypto day trading account I blew up and see if I can get it all back. 170$ to 17K would be hella sweet.

>>60579704
No don't be dumb, UMA token holders decide the outcome. Just drop 20 bucks and forget about this.

>>60576408 (OP)
Yes. In the days leading up to the June25,2025 NATO summit in The Hague, President Zelensky deliberately shifted into a more formal “suit‑style” look for a string of high‑profile meetings—among them his bilateral with UK Labour leader (and incoming Prime Minister) Keir Starmer in London. The Kyiv Post reports that on the Monday before the summit he met Starmer wearing a black suit jacket, matching slacks and boots—“presumably the same he wore” to his NATO session a day later
kyivpost.com
. Likewise, Reuters notes that following the February Oval Office wardrobe row, Zelensky “opted for black suit‑style jackets and shirts without ties in subsequent high‑profile meetings, including ones with … British Prime Minister Keir Starmer”

So I think they will say its not a true suit. Like your typical suit and tie or tuxedo. I would not bet the farm on this but if you want to throw in some bucks I might risk it.

There are people who stand to win 9 million dollars if its a suit and people who has 2 million on NO I just think too many gamblers would be ruined if this was said as YES.

>>60576408 (OP)
kind of irresponsible of him to not think about the shareholders

remember guys, you can take on the world in a good suit

>>60576408 (OP)
Should have used Chainlink oracles as the source of truth for Zelenskyy wardrobe not the uma scam, whales can and have Rigged outcomes on polymarket before, they will get away with it