This is gonna create a shitstorm 15x bigger than the Venezuela election outcome

>>60583233 (OP)
So obviously a suit. PM decides no they lose big time. Checken em

>>60583233 (OP)
the little jew was literally wearing a suit in england for the first time i bet he and his little kike helpers saw this poll and put all that money on yes so they could launder more money to jewkraine for more terrorism financing

>>60583238
It looks like a casual jacket to me

>>60583355
It's a suit, Ivan.

>average Yes buyer

>>60583233 (OP)
I still don't know who are the good guys, suit or no-suit?

>>60583386
the suit guys

>>60583233 (OP)
>>60583294
This shit is like betting on those first few Jake Paul fights. Actual free money.

>>60583386
It is quite subjective, was it a suit or no? I do not own a suit but I do own a similar jacket.

>>60583389
Thanks.

>>60583392
I don't care about le truth. I just wanna know who is who on this retarded crypto drama.

>>60583397
Reason for Yes: 30+ mainstream media outlets called it a suit, Zelenski himself called it a suit, fashion designers have called it a suit, Ukraines official social media accounts are calling it a suit
Reason to vote No: The UMA whales already loaded up on No

chance for Yes to win: 0%
chance for No to win: 100%

>>60583420
how can they justify the "no" outcome though

>>60583233 (OP)
>>60583379
>>60583355
>>60583375
>>60583390

Can someone TLDR me on this?

Polymarket bets? Who confirms it? What classifies as a "suit" because he wore one last time? So who decides or presses the button?

Basically you are giving a platform all the money then and hope they are honest enough to pay out?

Wouldn't Chainlink (LINK) stop this?

>>60583509
This doesn't matter for them. They built a cattle pen for us, its fence is made of moral and laws. Learn to think guilt-free. They created a transactional society, you have to live in it.

>>60583517
Here's the AI slop answer:
If a dispute occurs, UMA token holders vote on the correct outcome.
The dispute is resolved based on the outcome of this decentralized vote.
The final outcome is then enforced on-chain.

And who decides this shit?

>>60583846
So basically that doesnt change anything because the definition isnt written in stone its just what the majority thinks

>>60583848
Derek Guy

>>60583517
A suit can be shorts and bra.
>>60583850
Yeah, the (((majority))).
whales are scammers and if they say 2+2=10 then they're right

>>60583386
Suit guys, the not suit ones are filthy pajeets who thought they could make a quick buck betting their entire worth onto it.

>>60583517
Anyone who has a shitload of UMA tokens, and you know how that “AI” chat support was ousted as just some pajeet call center? The UMA protocol is just that, just a bunch of Indians faking the whole consensus and just flat out rigging it.

>>60583233 (OP)
>odds dont go in the houses favor
>cheat you out of winnings
lol/lmao

It was all black so it was the most suitest of suits worn at the NATO summit if we follow the actual definition of the word. "Suit" would also apply to a myriad of exotic foreign cultural wear, so restricting "suit" to just mean a very specific kind of modern male outfit from the anglosphere is fucking low IQ.

>venezuela
>elections
he doesn't know kek

>>60584025
The dumbass who set the rules should have explicitly stated that it should be a western style suit and tie instead of just throwing the word suit in there.

suit or lawsuit

>>60583970
why did Polymarket stop using Kleros? At least the 2020 election shitshow was handled somewhat honestly

Is there anything a bigger menace than brown scammer poojeets?

>>60583233 (OP)
why is the bet still open?
people can still bet on that outcome even though it was for an event before 1st of july?

>>60586822
it's because the outcome system is still in disarray. despite zelenskyy wearing what is obviously a suit, and the major media outlets verifying this with articles written BEFORE july 1st as well, major polymarket whales and pajeets that bet "no" as a "risk-free 2% bond" are risking losing their entire networths because zelenskyy, effecitvely wore a suit. therefore since the "yes he wore" and "no he didn't" are being disputed still, you can still bet. Betting yes is essentially betting for polymarket deciding the correct outcome.

Wait is this why I'm seeing zelensky all over biz? Because of a bet on polymarket? I guess it is pretty funny watching people perform herculean mental gymnastics to convince themselves that it's not a suit, what a dumb controversy if you can even call it that.

>>60583848
>And who decides this shit?
Oracles (Chainlink)

>>60586853
an established AI powered chainlink oracle network would never fuck up so badly unironically

>>60583846
chainlink solves this

Zog/kike media and even the guy who made Jewlensky suit said it was a fucking suit but I guess a bunch of pajeets and incel chuds (I said this unironically) know better.
you all are fucking morons and too broke to gamble even $50 buying yes.
you already missed out on a 2x and a 7x total by swing trading

>>60586827
so its GME all over again and kikes will flip the gameboard after losing and change the rules to guarantee they win

>>60583386
Very obvious

>>60586505
>Is there anything a bigger menace than brown scammer poojeets?
No

>>60586853
>>60587848
chainlink said Biden won in 2020 so...

>>60583981
There is no house in this scenario retard, its peer to peer.