>>60584959 (OP)
She's perfect. Who is she?

>>60584959 (OP)
scam

>>60584959 (OP)
>tattoos
dropped

>>60584962
Sasha Nazarov

>>60584959 (OP)
Imagine the smell of her feet after walking around in sandals on a humid summer day

>>60584962
She is for chad only

>>60584962
>she

>>60584971
I really gotta dish out on a 10/10 escort just so I can live as a chad for one night. I feel like I need one 10 under my belt just to have said I done it. I've gotten 7s, 8s, and one 9 when I was 19 (had no idea how rare this was and was an ungrateful little shit), but no flawless 10. Gotta whoremaxx in Eastern Europe before WW3 kicks off

Nobody is interested in link

>>60584966
Alexandra Nazarova

>>60584965
Retard. Stay a virgin

>>60585029
Dumpina Bagorena

>>60585030
Nah he's right. It's like pissing all over a Monet.

>>60585000
She's a Russian escort and will run you about 1500RUB($20)/hr

While you're desperately trying to get some 7/10's attention who's talking to 45 other men, you could just hop on a plane and enjoy a much better looking whore for 1/10th the cost of taking one on a date at home

>>60585049
She'll let you bust in her mouth and even piss on her

>>60584965
they all have tattoos lmao

>>60584965
Bruh, she's a fucking whore lmao...

This is probably just some anon shitposting for the lulz, but the fact that there ALWAYS has to be at least one anon that says that shit verbatim when the chick being discussed has a tattoo. It never fucking fails.

>>60584962
>perfect
Wrong. I see a tattoo on her back.

>>60584962
>Who is she?
Prostitute. Just another whore that you can use like a fleshlight, paid by the hour. Pump, inseminate, dump, and move on.

>>60585060
The term "Cooney sex act" is not a standard or widely recognized term for a specific sexual act. However, there is some anecdotal evidence of it being a coined or made-up term.

apologize

>>60585155
>the fact that there ALWAYS has to be at least one anon that says that shit verbatim when the chick being discussed has a tattoo

hell ya dude, its probably literally me half the time. i love saying that. and i feel it in my heart too.

>>60584965
based

>>60585030
>>60585114
>I made a low IQ trashy decision so I need to project onto others when they rightfully shame me for doing something retarded

>>60584965
this
>>60585030
ngmi
>>60584959 (OP)
true. link should be outside of the top 20

>>60585175
It's just my phone translating vodka runes

>>60585049
They charge 120 for half an hour here (not visit u) and don't look anything like this god damn

>>60585049
They're like $400 an hour in commiefornia for girls that look 10x shittier.

>>60585049
This can’t be real, no way a girl that good looking is a whore that does those things. She could just do an only fans instead. Probably fake pic or heavily edited.

>>60584959 (OP)
Because it is a much better project which has actual uses for its token instead of just its privately licensed software that doesn't even use it.

>>60584959 (OP)
You thought the elite wouldn’t install or encourage poverty traps?

>>60584965
>>60585034
>>60585155
>>60585166
>>60585188

Yikes... Incels much?

Why are tattoos so intimidating for y'all?

Or girls who aren't virgins for that matter?

You realize that some people actually go out and live life to the fullest?

Not everyone stays a pathetic loser doing nothing with their lives smfh...

Thats why you guys neg these kind of girls, because you know you and your lives wouldnt compete

/thread

Older project with a bigger cult following

>>60586594
Sorry queens, but both incels AND Chads prefer debt free virgins.

Living your life to the fullest has consequences.

>>60585172
>condom
>inseminate
pick one chuddot

>>60586594
THISBAITMAKESMEANGRY

>>60586611
How do you know she has debt? Did you check her bank account?

>>60586675
Maybe the people baiting are the pointy elbow incels?

>>60585019
You realise that's because all the people with low IQ are searching what already has been?
Please, explain to me why anything on that list besides Bitcoin has a chance of hitting new highs before a significant retracement?

>>60586722
Fuck off baggie

Chainlink is gay

XRP is king

>>60584959 (OP)
>>60585019
See pic.
Current crypto speculators keep literally useless cryptos like XRP at the top, which makes all of crypto look like it's a bunch of useless scams.
This keeps new money far away.

>>60586961
Holy cope

Chainlink labs doesnt even have an office lmao

Ripple works in over 120 countries together with banks

They literally have ties to governments

But yeah keep buying your stupid fat russian scammer ethereum token that is literally not needed

>>60586961
but nobody uses the LINK token

>>60586964
Ripple has existed for 13 years and to this day has no users whatsoever.
And Chainlink has 1000x more banking and institutional partners than Ripple.

>>60586967
Everyone who uses chainlink uses the token.

>>60586971
>has no users whatsoever.
are you retarded?

>>60586977
kek so who's using it?

>>60586980
Over 120 countries bro. They work with banks and governments.

>>60586981
I laughed, you got me good.

>>60586971
>Everyone who uses chainlink uses the token.
how? when did you use the token?

>>60584962
>perfect
>iphone
yeah, no.

>>60586989
When you used anything done by Chainlink nodes.

>>60586998
>anything done by Chainlink nodes
such as? be specific and stop fucking around retard

>>60586594
>this guy put a Buc-ees sticker on his 'made-it' Lambo

>>60587001
>too retarded to know or look up what Chainlink is being used for
>lashes out at others

typical retard behavior

>>60586981
Nobody's using it right now, and Ripple themselves admitted banks don't want to use it.

>>60587010
what did you use the token for bro? it's a fairly straight forward question

>>60587022
Everything chainlink nodes have ever done used the token.
Loosen the strap on your indoor helmet a little, your brain isn't getting any oxygen.

>>60587028
so you never used the token yourself?

>>60587030
If you ever used Chainlink - or any service or project that used Chainlink - you used the token. Directly or indirectly.

>>60587035
so you yourself have never actually used the token? that's why you can't bring up a single instance of this happening?

>>60587036
>so you yourself have never actually used the token?
I've use various defi services, so I've absolutely used the token.

>>60587038
>I've use various defi services
such as? why are you making this so difficult?

>>60587040
Why do you want me to list specific defi products?

>>60587047
why can't you list a singular example of you actually using LINK?

>>60586732
Mate I think your bot or script is broken.
My post never mentioned Chainlink once.

>>60586981
its only 109 anon I know it doesn't seem like a big difference but its important to tell the truth

>>60587083
oh 120 is the amount of countries jews got expelled from

I always mix them up

>>60587072
There's zero point in me personally listing specific defi products.
This is just you crying in the corner you backed yourself into.

1) everything Chainlink nodes do requires the token
2) most of defi uses Chainlink
3) everyone who's used defi most likely used Chainlink, and therefore the Link token

>>60587083
And yet none of them actually use Ripple.

>>60587090
1. great, how exactly did you specifically used the token?
2. that doesn't answer my question
3. that doesn't either, I don't know what "used defi" actually means because you simply refuse to provide a singular valid example of this usage
the real answer is that you've never used LINK, that's why you resort to vague statements

>>60587038
Don't bother feeding them anymore.
You'd be better off asking him sarcastically that he has never built a deFi product, but he still wouldn't understand.
The other retard is just sentimental about xrp and he's forgotten why it pumped before Christmas and for some reason thinks there's going to be another one.

>>60587100
Anything Link nodes have ever done requires the token.
If you've ever used anything done by Chainlink (almost anything in defi), you've used the token.

>>60587105
>he's forgotten why it pumped before Christmas
kek didn't Schwartz himself say he had no idea why it pumped back then?

>>60587100
Hi, I'm a developer and I need to have the correct price of ETH in USD at all times to support my app. I pay a service to have this available to me. I use LINK to pay.

Also hi, I'm a protocol manager and I asked my grunts to establish a way for my dapp to be used across multiple blockchains and I care about using the best solution for this. They asked me for funds. They also mentioned that I can pay in LINK or take a +10% premium hit if I don't use it. I paid in LINK.

>>60587105
>You'd be better off asking him sarcastically that he has never built a deFi product
>asking him that he has never built a deFi product
could you repeat your sarcastic question with proper grammar this time?
>what have you used the LINK token for?
>hurrrr have you ever built a deFi product bro???
what is this nonsense?
>>60587112
what did you use that's done by Chainlink dude? how difficult is that to answer?
>>60587113
>I'm a dev
>I need to have the correct price of ETH in USD at all times to support my app
what exactly is your app and why does it need to check the price of ETH?
>I'm a protocol manager and I asked my grunts to establish a way for my dapp to be used across multiple blockchains
I'm assuming that both of these examples are hypotheticals, because you're obviously neither a dev nor a protocol manager
so there's not a single person ITT whom has actually used anything related to the token itself? huh

>>60587113
>ETH

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

>>60587118
>what did you use that's done by Chainlink
Chainlink powers most of defi at this point. You didn't know?

>>60587125
ok, what did YOU use though

>Guys ETH very important guys thats why we need chainlink we actually need two shitcoins not one

XRP solves all of this

>>60587128
why?

>>60587136
how can you state that something's used with such certainty when you've never used it yourself?

>>60587132
>thats why we need chainlink
Ripple says yes.

>>60587141
It's officially time for you to stop posting.

>>60587146
???
so you've used ripple? I genuinely do not understand what your post implies

>>60587146
obvious shoop is obvious

Funny how XRP fud increases when XRP suddenly starts mooning kek

very organic guys

>>60587148
>genuinely do not understand
clearly

>>60587156
are you mentally handicapped?
you can't provide a single legitimate instance of LINK usage and you constantly post nonsensical responses

>>60587118
Criticizing grammar or spelling for that matter isn't an argument when the essence of what was said is conveyed.
I'll be direct: you aren't worth explaining either point to, because you simply don't want to be proven wrong. Which is fine. Put everything into XRP. Please do this. Please keep taking screenshots of your bags.

>>60587158
>you can't provide a single legitimate instance of LINK usage

I can and did: most of defi.

>>60587160
your response to my inquiry was "why haven't you built a defi product?"
nonsense
>>60587161
and out of most of defi, what did YOU use that required you to buy LINK?

>>60587183
>what did YOU use that required you to buy LINK?
Why me personally?

>>60587183
See? You understood exactly what I meant, which was to verbalize (as in place what I said into a rhetorical verb format), and you are still too stupid to understand what the point of it was.
>and out of most of defi, what did YOU use that required you to buy LINK?
>Waaaah! if i didn't have to buy it personally then i never used it!!! I never pay indirectly for things which are part of the supply chain of the product or service i use!!
Fucking idiot.

>>60587188
it's okay anon, we all know you haven't used it at all
>>60587189
you seem extremely upset and triggered over a very simple question
let me guess, you haven't used the token yourself either, right?

>>60587189
impotent bagholder rage, love to see it

>>60587112
>kek didn't Schwartz himself say he had no idea why it pumped back then?
Yes, yes he did.

>>60587244
Chainlink becoming a cornerstone of defi has been documented for years now. Bank of America wrote about it years ago.
Why do you think it's not real?

Hey what VPN did you use to get your link staking rewards?

is XRP real or not
I have 1300
bought most of it a bit too high
you are all retarded
gib me advice

>>60584959 (OP)
I fucking love ponytails

>>60588010
It can go to about $37k because all the money will be on XRP. So yeah you are pretty much made it

>>60586682
Anon, the moment you did that femcel sperg you lost. Accept it and bow out with what little dignity you have.

>>60586642
>He fucks women via a rubbery implement from some factory that probably leeches chemicals into his dick
If you're not going flesh to flesh, you may as well be fucking a glove, and it'd be cheaper too

I used my chainlink tokens when I staked ;)