>>60597749>Look up his parents!>Look up his Wikipedia!You could just post the evidence - if it exists.
But you won't, because YOU are EXPLOITING a human COGNITIVE BIAS known as the Availability Cascade, in which casual (lazy) observers will believe something ascends to truth sub-consciously through repetition. You know the majority of people will not go and seek out this information (which does not exist).
This is the same reason you same fag and use different IPs to post.
>See what I mean transparency = truth>Let me repeat>Transparency = truthYep, there's that REPETITION again.
A normal, genuine person who doesn't want to mislead people would post their claim and explain it's ramifications.
Academics the world over also discredit Wikipedia as a reliable source of information. You would know this if you had any tertiary qualifications taht weren't from a degree farm in india.