If the issue of the US is not the scarcity of the resources available, but instead the misallocation of said resources, why would the redistribution of wealth and higher taxes fix everything?

it is the "redistribution of wealth" and high taxes that create the severe resource misallocation since they are arbitrary

The issue is scarcity tho

>>60587308 (OP)
The main issue of the US is that it has become so big that a constitutional republic isnt going to carry it. Every 4 years a new administration is voted in, so new policies, new laws, new almost everything. An empire with no direction or purpose only degenerates along with its people.

>>60587308 (OP)
Social media has ripped the mask off. Elites aren't capable.
The laws need to be rewritten to counter capital allocation nepotism and the branding effect.

>>60587337

The answer is that we need a long term central ruler to supervise and oversee everything, craft the long time horizon plan and strategy and curb the short term spenders and grifters.

This is why Venice was the only successful republic ever. They had a Doge that served for life as the father of the country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doge_of_Venice

>>60587353
Maybe this worked half way back then when the most complex man made apparatus was a wind sail. People are too stupid to do that now.
We need to immediately get rid of "leaders" and replace them with machines. Can't get worse than 125 IQ nepotistic, sociopathic mental cases in charge.

>>60587366

Your opinion is very backwards. All good enterprises, business or government, start with a great central leader at the head. His job isn't to micromanage, more to delegate appropriate and hold a high standard for the organization. A central ruler is accountable, an assembly or committee or bureaucracy is not, and a machine is CERTAINLY not.

Leaders and great leaders are timeless and the start of any functioning human endeavor. Check out any great corporation, most of the time when the founder steps down it goes to shit after being inherited by the slop committee.

>>60587353
Also, we need to completely replace leadership with grass root smaller scale systems, replacing inefficient big systems with rapid involved decisions in leaderless structures. Would also solve the problem that leaders aren't affected by their decisions, so they always go for the most bribes. The need for parental figures is easily abused, and should therefore be curbed.

>>60587368
Machines decide way better than some mentally challenged leader could do. Carrying a vision is just a parameter in an objective function in some code base now. It's really time to get rid of inept parental figures.

>>60587308 (OP)

#1. It's not even "redistribution" which is a Marxist term that has infected the zeitgeist. It's just theft. For something to be "redistributed" it would've needed to be distributed to the current owner in the first place. If I build something, or gather the capital and resources needed to build something, it wasn't distributed to me, I created it in the first place.

#2. Resources are only misallocated when government bureaucracies and middlemen are involved. In a free-market, resources being missallocated would immediately be corrected by market forces, because the companies involved would immediately see a mismatch on their books (either a lack in supply, causing a hike in prices, in which case companies would start flooding the market with more product, or a lack in demand and an oversupply in product, leading companies to pull back on that production to look for other areas to fulfill). The only reason this shit doesn't function smoothly is because governments are constantly regulating, taxing and subsidizing the fuck out of every little transaction in the economy. I really don't think most Conservatives, Fascist Wannabes, Liberals or Leftoid Retards understand how bad the government bureaucracy really is, then they go and blame "Le evil Capitalism and/or Jews!" for every bad thing that's ever happened on the planet.

#3. Fractional Reserve Lending (which never really functioned the way most people think it did) has been around for 1,000+ years and we don't even use that system anymore anyways. Credit Banking has been around since at least the 1800s, before the Federal Reserve even existed. Commercial Banking evolved naturally on its own, no matter what type of governmental system was in place. Whether you have a Capitalist, Fascist, Monarchy, or Communist country, you're going to have some type of Fractional/Credit Banking system.

#4. Higher taxes and welfare don't help and can actually cause higher inflation in many instances.

>>60587380
>>60587376

I feel like you are a spoiled single child who has never worked in tech before lmao

>death to parents
>we need small scale machine rule

>>60587308 (OP)
But the working class receives 99% of all goods and services.
What misallocation are you talking about, and be specific

>>60587911
Misallocation towards public services such as healthcare, education and infrastructure. Supposedly, there is not enough funding going towards those services as of right now, and it is not due to the lack of resources within the US, but instead, it is about ''skewed priorities'' that do not go towards socially conscious decisions given the ideology of capitalism not prioritizing such public services, as they are ''not deemed to be profitable in the short-term''. And not only just that, but given the fact that capitalism in its inert state does not favor socialist tendencies, if we are to take into consideration that just about any developed nation makes compromises, be it a capitalist state that passes on decisions that could be considered to be socially conscious, smilarly, socialist nations likewise compromise their ideologies in favor of capitalist market-oriented qualities. This is not an opinion I have, but it is instead part of a narrative that has gained a foothold over American politics for quite some time now.