Not even ripple uses XRP to send money, they use Swift LMAO

>>60615430 (OP)
XRP is The Standard®
XLM too

Chainlink = shit

>>60615433
/thread

>>60615430 (OP)
Okay but normals buying it because its "cheap".

>>60615433
How can both be the standard? They do the same thing lol

>>60615430 (OP)
I honestly still don’t know what xrp does

>>60615430 (OP)
you sound like a sidelined faggot

>>60615430 (OP)
ahh see but crypto is the future of finance, not the present

>>60615740
you can use it by sending it to other people who can then cash it out for USD

>>60615430 (OP)
I like how biz instinctually associates swift as chainlink

>>60616201
So like, every crypto in existence?

>>60615430 (OP)
SWIFT don't settle money, they are a financial messaging company that Ripple is able to operate within. Ripple as of 2023 ALREADY, mid-heat of the lawsuit, settled 50% of their transactions using XRP per an interview with the same CEO you are quoting here:
https://www.scb10x.com/en/blog/crypto-enabled-infrastructure

This is how easy it is to know this and how little you know and this is a portrayal of how bad at research and understanding of the literal core most basic concept of your investment thesis it takes to invest in LINK. Lol

>>60615433
Checked

>>60618266
50% of what, $1M bribes to African banks? KEK

>>60616204
Me too. Its just too good

>>60618266
>Ripple as of 2023 ALREADY, mid-heat of the lawsuit, settled 50% of their transactions using XRP
kek yeah, 50% of RippleNet transactions are ODL transactions which do use XRP.
Too bad Ripple themselves said ODL doesn't do shit for the price of XRP.

Also, nobody on earth is using Ripplenet. So really it's 50% of basically nothing.

>>60618354
I never said anything contrary to this and this is based on their prior ODL model which they changed and now are to the most recent description I have seen built on secondary sales from public exchanges. Are you admitting your original claim which you made a thread about is objectively false? You are the same faggot who posts misrepresenting screenshots of docs over and over in every thread and gets wrecked LITERALLY every single time. You spend at least 12 hours a day posting this way. What the fuck is worth it to be this way on something unprincipled which you know you are lying about? Why not just change your investment when you realize you are wrong?
See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=h0m11s5

>>60618310
They have processed billions in global transactions and are used by SBI (the bank that decides for 81% of Japanese banking assets as head of the consortium, who are also the largest outside shareholder in XRP, the CEO says they are building their entire crypto strategy around XRP, and who formed the company "SBI Ripple Asia," specifically for payments in Asia, which already have corridors using XRP) in multiple divisions of their business. Funny you mentioned Africa because they are used by the largest digital wallet terminal in Africa with hundreds of millions of users with payouts to Europe etc. They are also used by Bank Social (look up their network reach Lol). Sorry you are just retarded and completely oblivious (or more probably wilfully repressed to cope because you EXTREMELY cringily prefer signaling consensus with a cult built around particular coin (probably link (which is LITERALLY not even used by Chainlink in their business)) rather than making money).

>>60618680
>are used by SBI
Not really, see pic.

>>60618666
>this is based on their prior ODL model which they changed
kek you just made this up, Satan.

>>60618685
Yup you are same faggot. Not sure why you even use this pic when it is demonstrably not the case.
>SBI Digital Asset Holdings, SBI's digital asset division uses XRP as a bridge asset for settlements and acts as a liquidity provider for XRP in Asian markets.
> SBI Ripple Asia formed the “Asia-Pacific Banks Blockchain Consortium” with institutions like Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand) and CIMB (Malaysia).
>SBI Remit, SBI's international remittance arm uses Ripplenet for settlement and XRP in a few of the payment corridors already.
>SBI developed Moneytap (partnered with 42 (and some very large) banks) a mobile payments app offering 24/7 domestic realtime payments, which uses Ripplenet.

Should also be noted that SBI Holdings is a Soft Bank spinoff (consider in terms of Trump's love of Massa) and the corridors SBI Remit already uses XRP in with other Ripple partners like Siam Commercial Bank, are relatively high volume corridors. We are not talking about payments from Namibia to Western Sahara. Lol
https://www.kapronasia.com/asia-payments-research-category/sbi-holdings-and-ripple-step-up-their-cooperation.html

>>60618685
>>60618689
Pic related is SBI's CEO:
>SBI represents the Japanese banking consortium which account for 80% of the banking assets in Japan. Also, BIS Project Agora participant SBI Shinsei Bank just announced the use of Ripple for international remittances:
https://www-sbigroup-co-jp.translate.goog/news/2025/0131_15229.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp
>SBI and Ripple formed a joint venture with Ripple owning 40% and SBI owning 60% called "SBI Asia." Description from the press release detailing their objective in forming it: “As a joint venture established by Ripple, an American fintech venture company, and SBI Holdings, Inc., SBI Ripple Asia creates the “Internet of Value” in Japan and other Asian region by merging the expertise and technology of both companies. Participants of RippleNet, which uses distributed ledger technology (DLT), can directly connect with financial institutions with a single API and instantly and reliably transfer money in more than 40 currencies to more than 70 countries. SBI Ripple Asia provides RippleNet to financial institutions and money transfer service operators in Japan, South Korea and certain Southeast Asian countries.":
https://www.sbigroup.co.jp/english/company/group/sbirippleasia.html
>SBI are the largest non-Ripple investor in Ripple and literally offer XRP to private investors who buy a sufficient amount of SBI shares.
>SBI is using the XRPL to introduce NFTs:
https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/ripples-grand-plan-unveiled-xrpl-nfts-to-steal-the-show-with-millions-of-users-set-to-join-initiative/

>>60618685
>>60618689
>>60618690
Pic related is also SBI CEO. They include XRP in every shareholder slidedeck and the CEO personally retweets XRP news constantly, even secondary news like posts from OMNI founder Austin King who worked on Interledger Protocol for Ripple talking about how OMNI helps XRP adoption. Also:
Ondo just announced they are tokenizing treasuries on it and included it in their list of core networks in the org chart they released (others are Layer Zero, Aptos, SUI, Solana, Ethereum, and Bitcoin). SBI are launching their NFTs on it later this year. They are literally still being sued by the SEC and this is still true and could name many more.
Also see:
https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledger
Archax is the first ever digital securities exchange regulated by the FCA in London:
https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledger
See also:
https://archax.com/insights/archax-adds-state-street-fidelity-international-lgim-offerings-to-regulated-digital-platform

>>60618689
>>60618690
>>60618697
Look at all this gish gallop kek

And all for fucking SBI, a small player that Chainlink is also working with but at a much larger scale.

>>60618685
Didn't make it up. I literally gave you a Ripple Swell event presenting it in detail uploaded by Ripple in a timestamped link to when they start talkinga about it. Why do you devote SO much of your life to lying about one crypto project? Why not just change portfolio positioning? No matter how many times you spam and are 100% of the time owned on the same low IQ fud and pictures which literally contribute nothing new, you will still lose as reality crystallizes in spite of propaganda. You're literally just ensuring you yourself don't make it and making XRP investors steelman our position against empty oft parroted fud to show how empty what you say is which leads to more people buying XRP. Is it just a paid by the hour/engagement thing? How little is your streetshitter savage integrity worth?

>>60618705
>Didn't make it up
I didn't say you made anything up.

Hell I wouldn't know if you made anything up because I didn't read a word of your verbal diarrhea.

>>60618700
Posting a mountain of evidence that proves you wrong in a time unlimited forum discussion is not "gish galloping." Gish galloping is throwing a ton of different points together that you would have no time to respond to to win rhetorically. I am proving one point with multiple evidences and you have as long as you could possibly need to respond. We are not in a formal timed debate, we are debating online. Arguments of this sort from logicians typically are multi-faceted and sufficiently comprehensive. Why do people who invoke informal fallacies NEVER understand them and why are they always the same 4 or so (strawman, ad hominem, gish gallop, and word salad (not technically one but rhetorically similar to one in how people arbitrarily use it as a "I don't like what you said so I am going to use a word and pretend that makes it incoherent because I don;'t know how to reply to it")? How low IQ can you be.

>>60618705
>I literally gave you a Ripple Swell event presenting it in detail uploaded by Ripple in a timestamped link
Your link doesn't work

>>60618715
I'm not reading all that shit faggot.
Post like a human.

>>60618711
You don't know how to respond because you don't know anything and are objectively proven wrong by me 6 different ways on the same claim. See what I wrote about "word salad" and substitute your version of "verbal dairrhea." You are incapable of the level of input and sustained attention span and working memory needed for analysis and you are a low IQ person. On word salad, see:
>>60618715

>>60618700
Yep, knew you were a link investor. Lol Where is SBI Chainlink Asia? Where is the large stake in Chainlink Labs or statement from the CEO they are building their entire crypto strategy around the token? Where is the mention of it in their quarterly shareholder reports? SBI is literally the head of the Japanese banking consortium.

>>60618731
>Where is SBI Chainlink Asia?

SBI Ripple Asia exists because Ripple paid for nearly half of it.
And it has absolutely no traction, even in Japan which is SBI's home country. See >>60618685

>>60618720
I am talking like a person. You are objectively lying in a REALLY embarrassing and inept way and are unable to reply so you are misusing informal fallacies and ironically sophistically ad homing to try to divert from substance and have me dismissed on my form rather than ,y substance. Really low IQ and weak stuff from you. Sorry I accidentally deleted part of the necessary link when deleting the magnet to timestamp. Here is a working link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsBEuXLXZuk&t=663s

>>60618750
Your link is from 5 years ago.
This >>60618354
is from a court deposition Ripple themselves made a year ago.

ODL is exactly as described: demand neutral for XRP.

>>60618736
Not sure exactly what you think your pick prove other than that you have no concept of business structures. This was announced in the press release as a newly formed company with a 60/40 partnership between SBI (who again are the largest outside shareholders in Ripple and literally give new investors in SBI XRP as a perk for investing). They are used in multiple countries and were setup to facilitate remittances in Asian countries. You have never heard of them until googling them and then just post the first thing you see and misrepresent it unknowingly because you are unfamiliar with an extremely common business structure. You have no concept of their business nor of the other several divisions of SBI which already use XRP. Every claim you've made has been very easily provably false with extremely light research. You are proving how stupid you need to be and tech illiterate to be a chainlink investor. Ripple didn't buy the equity at offering, they formed the company together. Ripple is literally in the name and always was. Lol

>>60618760
xerpie having an aneurism kek

Ripple paid for "SBI Ripple Asia" to be created in 2016, nearly TEN YEARS AGO.
And all they have to show for it today is a single small Japanese bank doing "hometown remittances".

>>60618758
The lawsuit is built around sales from several years prior which at times dealt with OTC sales to institutions and marketing. Their foreign product is built around exchanges mostly. The lawsuit had them adjust their US based strategy to stablecoins in the interim due to the injunction but no ruled that secondary sales do not qualify as securities offerings freeing them to broaden the form they described in the video explicity using the exchanges to the US, but US banks do not yet have sufficient clarity to use any crypto in large batch settlement, nor have messaging standards migrated yet to be able to handle them in messaging in a generalized way (this change is happening to Fedwire literally a few days from now after 70 years and 15 years of strategizing and standards roundtabling). The type of offering they were doing was demand neutral because you buy on one exchange and sell on another or because it was sold OTC with no market hit. Now micropayments will process in a way that burns XRP while liquidity providers and Ripple’s buybacks absorb XRP, reducing sell-side impact. Additionally, escrow management and RLUSD fees indirectly increase XRP demand, undermining neutrality. Ripple alone have bought billions from the secondary market in XRP. Everyone who usees XRP is incentivized to own XRP and to see its price as high as possible because its efficiency increases as volatility decreases. Unlike Chainlink which is faster and more secure and cheaper using CLL subsidized private software for price feeds without the token and one of 30 more efficient public or private chains for actual value storage and settlement.

LMAO LINKIES SEETHING

>>60618762
Neither part of this is true. Why are SBI the largest shareholder in Ripple? Did they pay them to take a large corporate stake and build out their entire crypto strategy in XRP? REALLY ironic coming from a linkie.You as a token holder are literally a corporate welfare paypig for the company to subsidize deals they have institutions agree to which they then promote to you to market you buying more tokens which their service does not even use and never will to move value in any real way.

>>60618780
but also* ruled that...

>>60615430 (OP)
I appreciate that xrp holders have been holding for ages without any real developments so it's hard to imagine they'll change lanes now

But since they are mostly in profit, wouldn't this be the most sensible time to sell and buy something else?

>>60618780
You said ODL had changed since that screenshot about XRP being demand neutral, but your source for that is 5 years older than the screenshot.
You absolute retard.

>>60618787
>Neither part of this is true.
source for part 1: pic here >>60618736
source for part 2: pic here >>60618685

Both parts are literally true.

>>60618804
My source details the mechanic for their process which was one way they did ODL and now is the only way they even hypothetically could in the US per the injunction. It is also the way it is done internationally. This is the change. And Ripple cannot be judged legally on pressures built by the operation acted by others only the mechanical sales, but those detailed pressures mentioned above exist whether context permitted target of them by deepstater admin types or not. Part 1 is you not knowing what a 60 40 partnership is or why a company who is the largest outside shareholder in another company may form a joint slim majority controlled entity with them. Part 2 is just a pic with an arbitrary nothing picture you spam over and over thread after thread that has never made a single point on any claim and is refuted by a dozen sources I've already given and isn't even specifically about SBI Ripple Asia. For another:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/ripple-based-moneytap-adopted-by-three-japanese-banks
(used and supported by SBI Ripple Asia)

>>60618827
Is that a customer?!

Can we see the usage stats anywhere?

TNN

>>60618685
you sure triggered the poo ID loser yet again kek, why is this gay retard so invested in defending xrp

>>60615430 (OP)
soon, it will be paypal using vaulta infrastructure in web3.

>>60616198
I think I'll wait until it costs more then buy. That's the sensible approach, there's no point in buying cheap before it happens.

>>60618984
better yet, invest in depreciating assets like post wall women, nfts and chainliink

>>60615433
>>60615450
did you seriously just hop IDs to /thread your own comment?
holy fuck XRPaypigs are the dumbest cunts on this board

>>60618885
What do you mean? They publicly released use, Moneytap explicitly is this...What exactly do you want to see? Proprietary books/software usage stats? This is not the standard for any other company or corporate announcement and would be absurd to expect or to give from a customer privacy standpoint

>>60618760
You can't even just admit to the absolute simplest shit you absolute turbojew

>>60618960
Here comes the other linkfag posting the same screenshots over and over. You guys are the most annoying and lowest IQ and worst tier fud shit slinging Israel style liars. The left side of your post is already addressed comprehensively. The right side: You already know David addressed this and that you are deliberately framing his quote as saying something he did not. He explicitly replied to it and clarified the misinterpretation, something he shouldn't even have to do but there are a thousand desperate linkie faggots who have no real argument for the viability of their investment thesis so they just try to lie and twist the truth in the gayest ways imaginable. It makes you look so fucking retarded and annoying and is absolute social cancer to hoping people will join you. The only people who are worse than you even possibly are HARDCORE bitcoin maximalists who were trying to spread fake stories about Ripple when the stockpile was announced to not be exclusively bitcoin. They threw a fucking FIT. ALL litigated and proven to be junk. Here is David's reply, where he clarified he is saying the literal opposite of what you are suggesting he is by sharing it:
https://x.com/JoelKatz/status/1856495642094535044

>>60619238
Just admit what? You guys are wrong on every single accusation and every single accusation is Alinsky projection. You talk about tokens not being needed etc. You guys don't even understand your own investment thesis and when you have it clarified you throw a fucking FIT that is on par with antinatalist leftists seeing a happy traditional white family have children. You have a resentment based group identity that is REALLY cringily built around a fucking coin specific greed cult. Even when you have it proven before you you deny and deflect and project and throw the most vile and venemous knowingly wrong shit you can imagine with zero integrity or even remotely human treatment, being in the same price as 6 years ago, and being able to pivot and just move and reposition based on what you know to be true. You care less about what is true than you care about just posturing to have your coin be shown to be favorable even knowing your coin is literally just a liquidity extraction channel to be a paypig for a company whose builtout product does not translate back to token value. It is so weird it is almost tought to imagine existing let alone being. I am SO fucking happy to not be you I can't even fucking imagine the Hell it would be...

>>60619309
>admit what?
Ripple paid for SBI Ripple Asia Co.

>>60619238
I'm not even a maxi btw. Here are my picks:
XRP, QNT, XDC, ALGO, HBAR, AVAX, XLM, SUI, APT, FLR, ONDO, OMNI, ADA, SOL, POL, ARB, ATOM, DAG, AAVE, DOT, W, ZRO.

>>60619312
Holy shit they literally didn't. SBI are the largest outside shareholder in Ripple and are building their entire crypto strategy around XRP per the CEO himself in interview. They have a subsection of every single quarterly shareholder presentation that is explicitly and only about XRP and offer it to investors as a perk and use it in multiple divisions. They formed a joint venture they have a majority stake in at a common percentage point for such a venture with a company they have a huge financial stake in. This is not uncommon and you not understanding it is extremely telling for what you know and understand about business. You LITERALLY just hate that you are wrong and that we are right and REFUSE to just be a real person and swallow the fucking reality pill. You are like the people who took the clot shot who refuse to admit the people who didn't take multiple rounds of gene therapy for a year prior knowable flu risk were right.

>>60619330
>they literally didn't
Then how did they end up with 40% of the shares?

>>60619315
>so many shitcoins but no LINK
kek

>>60619339
They formed the company together when they named it SBI Ripple Asia. They didn't "pay for it" any more than SBI did. You literally don't understand how corporate equity is formed and stock distributed. Disregard W btw from the list in >>60619315. I did not mean to include it.

>>60619354
>They formed the company together
Yes, and Ripple put up 40% of the capital.

>>60619348
Every single one of those coins is strong for a high use case. The link token has no necessary value prospect and is actually optimized outside being used, in subsidized private software. Most of their partnerships are not even for anything but price feeds. Settlement and value storage even on CCIP is set for and tested by other private and public blockchains like Corda and Hyperledger and optimized using any of the handful I listed to settle value etc. There is no good value or security reason to use link and no requirement to do so and they are not going to ignore their own incentives for the sole reason of pumping your tech illiterate bags.

>>60619359
And so SBI by the same rationale disproportionately paid for it more than Ripple? Lol Also bearing in mind they did not need to purchase the stock in a private offering or at market, they formed it from nothing and built a company within a broader corporate partnership and then divied up operational input requirements etc.

>>60619366
>so SBI by the same rationale disproportionately paid for it more than Ripple?
Yes, 20% more.

>>60619362
>The link token has no necessary value prospect
kek this is your brain when you have no link

>>60619370
Okay, then we agree, but there is no fucking point to saying this. His whole point was to use this the same way >>60618960
is knowingly (he has been corrected literally dozens of times and doesn't care what's true) misrepresenting David's quote. He was trying to say that they "paid for it" to insinuate they only got it because they subsidized the agreement up front, which is disingenuous and an absolute strawmanning. You are just saying 40 percent is 20 percent less than 60 percent which contributes nothing to the conversation and states that they hold a different number stock in the company with SBI owning more. This contributes absolutely nothing and is a really weird attempt at cope instead of just admitting he was weird and disingenuous to try to frame it as Ripple buying reputational access from someone selling it.

>>60619362
90% of your picks in that list are straight up vaporware. It's hard to take your litany of arguments in favor of XRP ITT seriously after seeing that list + this as a justification >>60619362.

>>60619372
First thing any of you have been right about. Lol

>>60619394
All of your arguments are insubstantial narrative motivated gush and accusations without substance. Nothing I've said in this XRP or SBI or Ripple has been even remotely equivocal or arguable. You are unable to address points so now you are sophistically pivoting to trying to have the data itself overlooked for sake of my particular crypto picks but are really just showing what a weird and insubstantial mindset you have to have to stick with link. You guys are so truth avoidant and weird it is literally fucking insane. Like actual mental illness tier delusion and wilfull repression

Going to bed now, linkcels. Enjoy the rest of the thread.

>>60619393
>Okay, then we agree
You wrote half a dozen paragraphs only to end up finally agreeing to something this fucking obviously factual: that Ripple paid for "nearly half of" SBI Ripple Asia Co.

You have a fucking mental disorder. Go to the closest mirror in your vicinity right now and tell yourself to your face that you have a mental disorder.
Repeat it a few times and then go check yourself in at a psychiatric facility of your choosing.

>>60619409
>All of your arguments
I haven't give a single argument besides: accumulating such an extensive list of assorted shitcoins but NOT including another "muh utility" shitcoin (LINK) in that list is highly suspect. That's it. Not going to read any of the 20+ arguments ITT because you've proven yourself to be an emotional investor and therefore should not be taken seriously.

does this retarded fucking poo ID faggot know how to not write in paragraphs like a midwit? If you can't get your ideas across without running out of breath stop talking you look like an idiot, especially since you've been proven wrong again and again