>>60628457 (OP) You are typing digital nothing on digital nothing that is saved and preserved forever. Digital nothings have become quite relative in their nothingness, have they not?
>>60628457 (OP) for me the market is being wild op integrity dao holders use dextools like a compass not to trade but to see if weโre still pointed the right way
>>60628697 >integrity dao what is this? some Avax thing right?
AnonymousID: 9jdWGyx3
7/15/2025, 2:30:19 AM No.60628741
>>60628457 (OP) r/buttcoin faggots infiltrated this board lately t. sold a digital nothing for 112k and I feel like shooting myself in my nutsack with a shotgun
>>60628741 Why? if you sold and made profit you should be happy enough. Get off /biz and come back in one year from now and you'll be all good to reinvest
>>60628457 (OP) It's still better than getting a second job, plus there's no honor or anything like that in it anymore, at least by using dogs or things like shido I can speed up a salary a little without having an old bitch treat me like trash
>>60628770 bought at 19k so I made some profits, I wish my average was at least 115k but oh well, nno one can sell the top, especially not in this clown market t. not buying back until 82k then sell again my whole coin at november this year at 150k fuck this market
Crypto was designed by the nsa so they could have an asset they could easily confiscate without having to go door to door.
AnonymousID: WuMlNvNy
7/16/2025, 2:28:03 AM No.60634517
>>60628457 (OP) >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $12+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $120+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $1,200+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $12,000+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $120,000+ You are here. >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $1,200,000+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $12,0000,000+ >there are "people" on this board that bought fractions of digital nothing at $1,200,000,000+
>>60628457 (OP) Please feel free to stick to your physical somethingโs. I will enjoy outperforming you, as I have with your piers in the past. โEnjoymentโ may not even be the correct term. Itโs more like โrelishingโ in your inability to grasp a new paradigm and seeing how your lack of abstract functional thinking bars you from such a lucrative opportunity.
AnonymousID: WrO/T4xV
7/16/2025, 4:06:56 AM No.60634832
>>60634517 >>60634599 you forgot INFINITY bitcoin will be priceless and you simply won't be able to buy any quantity of it you will look at people happily transacting bitcoin back and forth, laughing from joy, and you will cry as you won't be able to join them EVER there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth
>>60634861 the price only goes higher when saylor dumps another billion in it then it slumps lower because everyone who's not a retard sells the new top then I buy and wait for saylor to dump another billion in it then I take the money of his investors
AnonymousID: 1Dgs4heo
7/16/2025, 4:19:18 AM No.60634889
>>60634517 >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $12+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $120+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $1,200+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $12,000+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $120,000+ You are here. >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $1,200,000+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $12,0000,000+ >"Damnit, I should have bought Bitcoin" $1,200,000,000+
>>60628457 (OP) >Why yes, I did buy more Bitcoin for over 100k. How could you tell? No, I haven't sold since 2017~, give or take. >Huh? Did I buy more Angel on Solana today? Why yes, of course I did. What kind of question is that? >Yes, that is correct. I believe Ethereum will make a comeback worthy of being added in history books for academia surrounding economics. >>60632082 Thinking multi-trillion dollar companies are the 'greater fools' above people that bought before the last two years is an immensely comical focus. This argument was valid before, not anymore. Sorry, argue with the wall. >>60634517 Based.