>>60636805 this formula is tested on bitcoin for like 14 years and has been running very well for 3 years since its creation with only 25% max drawdown. so yes. or to be more specific: yes, 68.75% chance
>>60636836 boborektinanusposter, where do you see the btc price topping out at? what about when? i feel like it's pretty soon myself, like in a month or two and somewhere between 160k-170k
>>60637510 you are asking for things no one can predict, and anyone giving you the answer is a liar. if he is right it was just luck >>60637521 sounds about right yeah >>60637544 what? i dont speak "hood" >>60637619 i made it myself, its mine, so no
>>60637913 i do not wish to offend at all by saying this but i care so little about what the temporary high will be that i will not spend the mental resources to think of this at the request of some anon, figuring out some reason that will still most likely be false would take like an hour of intensitvely thinking about it so no thanks >>60638108 >>60638115 XD
>>60638787 ssolar flare, no internet for years, no one knows what the price will be. There will be a lot of rape and destruction tho, everybodies nightmare, except for Indians, dream come true